Simo Häyhä said:I think Wonwokie players are overrated. I mean yeah they are good individually. But while Rayden is 99, Matafiks shouldn't be 99. Wonwokie had a great team work and better than before in this tournament especially. Cavs, archers, infantries are all good. But most of them cannot be compared to with the very high leveled ones, as i given the instance of Rayden and Matafiks. Matafiks can be a skilled archer but he is playing with a team which has perfect teamwork. But if he was playing for another team he might not be that good. On the other hand, besides being a good archer; the best to some; Rayden also creates his team and educates them if he thinks that his team is not enough and of course he leads them. So he is a good archer, good commander and a good teacher. The thing actually I want to say Rayden is not only a good player, he also does other things, so he has been thought to be one of the best.
I would agree that Rayden is better in the sense that he's talented in the three aspects you mentioned, but at the moment I'd say Mata is a better archer. As an example, yesterday we had a scrim against a Turkish team called GGWP (was some mix of like Belendor, Irsman, Toi and a few others), in the first round we won by killing their team - 6/8 kills were archer kills. Matafiks got 4 headshots, R3D got one headshot and Horace got one headshot all in the first round. Obviously a scrim is not the same as an official match, but furthermore you can see how much of an impact these archers have on our games, literally the thing that allows our other classes to shine as they have done recently.
I mean, here are some screens of matches with great teams, where archers are just carrying In one set there against F, archers have the top three spots and no doubt we would've lost the open map if we didn't have them. On an all time list I'd agree Rayden is better, however, at this moment in time I think it's fair where he is.