He is right, it does not matter what you did during the battle, the castle should be given wisely from a strategic sightThe game is set in the high middle ages. Merit has no bearing on things. Who did what is rather irrelevant.
Yes, he is a vassal after all, he needs to accept every word of his king. Even if the decision is not logical from his prospective.Your telling me if Lord X decides to risk his men to take a castle -it has ZERO bearing on deciding who gets it in the middle ages?
Everything he does is in the name of, and for the glory of, the king.Your telling me if Lord X decides to risk his men to take a castle -it has ZERO bearing on deciding who gets it in the middle ages?
Your telling me if Lord X decides to risk his men to take a castle -it has ZERO bearing on deciding who gets it in the middle ages?
If the guy with the most men keeps getting all the land, then he soon becomes the guy with more men then you
So it has more bearing then what people are letting on here, but you are trying to keep everyone equally indebted and equally gifted under your rule. Some of those houses could have been doing their job holding field armies off and raiding villages giving a distraction to allow the houses with more consolidated forces to march on the castle in the first place.
So even showing numbers about the siege has little worth on the overall war effort.
And this system is far less exploitable, both from a practical and game stand point. If getting fiefs and castles is all about being the one that takes them, why bother showing up when your fellow nobles need assistance to defend them. You're better off letting the place fall and being the house that retakes it afterwards
Well that would make for kind of a **** game, now wouldn't it?
People excusing this because 'its the middle ages' are idiots. A game needs to reward the player for playing it and succeeding.
There should be three candidates for who gets a fief; the leader of the siege, the king, and an influential noble with weight given to the leader of the siege.
Why play a medieval themed game if you dont want medieval gameplay? You're the only idiot here. It's like walking into a sauna and complaining it's too hot. Go somewhere else. And if you want stuff so bad just cheat instead of crying.
Could the formula be a little more complicated? Sure. But what some of you are suggesting is just gonna create yet another snowball
Lol okay kid. Have fun crying about how unfair your video game is.Absolutely btfo'ed and seething.
Just as I suspected you have no argument or reason for defending the current system. Naturally it is undefendable, as anyone with a brain acting in good faith would tell you with only slavish fanboys and trollish contrarians taking the time and effort to defend it.
The door is over there. Be a dear and see yourself out, you've been exposed.
Again, nothing to add. Pathetic. You can't even articulate your points let alone defend them. What are you even doing here? No one needs to hear feedback from you.Lol okay kid. Have fun crying about how unfair your video game is.
What was that you said about seething lmao.Again, nothing to add. Pathetic. You can't even articulate your points let alone defend them. What are you even doing here? No one needs to hear feedback from you.
Now THAT'S what I call butthurt hahahaImpotent rage and a subhuman mongrel like disposition are all you have to offer. No relevant opinions or points to add. Just a monkey in a cage for me to enjoy poking at.
Dance monkey, dance.Now THAT'S what I call butthurt hahaha