veterans

warband or bannerlord?

  • mount and blade bannerlord ii

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • mount and blade warband

    Votes: 6 46.2%

  • Total voters
    13

Users who are viewing this thread

miqaeli123

Regular
dear veterans this question only for you please tell my in the comments what is the reason for your choice that way devs will know what do u like or not like 2 different game
 

Ananda_The_Destroyer

Master Knight
I'll wait for Bannerlord to be finished before I chose definitively.
I will say warband has many many things I wish were copies into bannerlord.
In fact, I and many players wish it would have been say 90% exactly copied mechanics from warband and the more stuff added later.
1: Power level of tiers of troops. Bannerlord they're too weak. Warband you high tier troops feel really powerful!
2: Cavalry and Infantry: Both are weak and die too much in Bannerlord. Both were very strong in Warband.
3: Being KING. Bannerlord you have no control, only slight advantage in voting. Warband you have some control and final say on fiefs, I like this better.
4:Recruiting Lord: Bannerlord they just want money and they're all the same. Warband, relation matter much more, each personality of lord is different, some are much better vassals and you can create lords of you companions too!
5: Armor and damage: Bannerlord, best armor you still die in 2 hits. Warband best armor.... you get 3 or 4.... it makes a big difference though.
6: Passive skills: In bannerlord some are fast and some are slow or impossible to skill up. Warband you spend your points, you get your ability levels, it works. I like this because it works, I can make a much more useful character in warband. I like that.
&: Tid bits: Books, Sword sisters, dependable workshops, 1/2 wages for garrisons, ALL good stuff!
There's lots more too, in fact like I said, 90% of warband could just replace it's bannerlord equivalent and probably be a strait improvement.
 
Last edited:

miqaeli123

Regular
I'll wait for Bannerlord to be finished before I chose definitively.
I will say warband has many many things I wish were copies into bannerlord.
In fact, I and many players wish it would have been say 90% exactly copied mechanics from warband and the more stuff added later.
1: Power level of tiers of troops. Bannerlord they're too weak. Warband you high tier troops feel really powerful!
2: Cavalry and Infantry: Both are weak and die too much in Bannerlord. Both were very strong in Warband.
3: Being KING. Bannerlord you have no control, only slight advantage in voting. Warband you have some control and final say on fiefs, I like this better.
4:Recruiting Lord: Bannerlord they just want money and they're all the same. Warband, relation matter much more, each personality of lord is different, some are much better vassals and you can creat lords of you companions too!
5: Armor and damage: Bannerlord, best armor you still die in 2 hits. Warband best armor.... you get 3 or 4.... it makes a big difference though.
6: Passive skills: In bannerlord some are fast and some are slow or impossible to skill up. Warband you spend your points, you get your ability levels, it works. I like this because it works, I can make a much more useful character in warband. I like that.
&: Tid bits: Books, Sword sisters, dependable workshops, 1/2 wages for garrisons, ALL good stuff!
There's lots more too, in fact like I said, 90% of warband could just replace it's bannerlord equivalent and probably be a strait improvment.
I agree with you 3: 4: and 5: also good takes bro hope devs will listen to us veterans
 

anoddhermit

Sergeant
Bannerlord for me.

I can nitpick endlessly but base game Warband was way too much about repetitively cheesing sieges with Nord or Rhodok.

Bannerlord allows more alternative strategies in my experience so far, even if archers are too strong at the moment.

Warband got very formulaic relatively.

Plus of course the graphical improvements in Bannerlord make a difference.
 

vonbalt

Sergeant Knight
WBNWVCM&B
I'll wait for Bannerlord to be finished before I chose definitively.
I will say warband has many many things I wish were copies into bannerlord.
In fact, I and many players wish it would have been say 90% exactly copied mechanics from warband and the more stuff added later.
1: Power level of tiers of troops. Bannerlord they're too weak. Warband you high tier troops feel really powerful!
2: Cavalry and Infantry: Both are weak and die too much in Bannerlord. Both were very strong in Warband.
3: Being KING. Bannerlord you have no control, only slight advantage in voting. Warband you have some control and final say on fiefs, I like this better.
4:Recruiting Lord: Bannerlord they just want money and they're all the same. Warband, relation matter much more, each personality of lord is different, some are much better vassals and you can create lords of you companions too!
5: Armor and damage: Bannerlord, best armor you still die in 2 hits. Warband best armor.... you get 3 or 4.... it makes a big difference though.
6: Passive skills: In bannerlord some are fast and some are slow or impossible to skill up. Warband you spend your points, you get your ability levels, it works. I like this because it works, I can make a much more useful character in warband. I like that.
&: Tid bits: Books, Sword sisters, dependable workshops, 1/2 wages for garrisons, ALL good stuff!
There's lots more too, in fact like I said, 90% of warband could just replace it's bannerlord equivalent and probably be a strait improvement.
Exactly this.
 

Poddicus

Knight
M&BWBWF&SNWVC
Warband had a soul
Bannerlord is just a tedious meat grinder simulator and the only reason the battles in Bannerlord are considered "better" atm is because theyre bigger
I'll wait for Bannerlord to be finished before I chose definitively.
I will say warband has many many things I wish were copies into bannerlord.
In fact, I and many players wish it would have been say 90% exactly copied mechanics from warband and the more stuff added later.
1: Power level of tiers of troops. Bannerlord they're too weak. Warband you high tier troops feel really powerful!
2: Cavalry and Infantry: Both are weak and die too much in Bannerlord. Both were very strong in Warband.
3: Being KING. Bannerlord you have no control, only slight advantage in voting. Warband you have some control and final say on fiefs, I like this better.
4:Recruiting Lord: Bannerlord they just want money and they're all the same. Warband, relation matter much more, each personality of lord is different, some are much better vassals and you can create lords of you companions too!
5: Armor and damage: Bannerlord, best armor you still die in 2 hits. Warband best armor.... you get 3 or 4.... it makes a big difference though.
6: Passive skills: In bannerlord some are fast and some are slow or impossible to skill up. Warband you spend your points, you get your ability levels, it works. I like this because it works, I can make a much more useful character in warband. I like that.
&: Tid bits: Books, Sword sisters, dependable workshops, 1/2 wages for garrisons, ALL good stuff!
There's lots more too, in fact like I said, 90% of warband could just replace it's bannerlord equivalent and probably be a strait improvement.

Absolutely this ^ amongst other things
 
Top Bottom