US1 battle password

正在查看此主题的用户

Thornmisfor

Sergeant at Arms
What's the password to the public US1 Battle server? There were some nK individuals playing on there, however I then got kicked and realised a password had been put in place.
 
I hate to sound like a douche, but that's a public server and no reservation was made. I enjoy testing on the Battle server.
 
Thornmisfor 说:
I hate to sound like a douche, but that's a public server and no reservation was made. I enjoy testing on the Battle server.
It wasnt a battle server. And it wasnt nK practice. I was testing with bots on the new game mode. I normally wouldnt lock a server, but when people join and think they can walk around and kill people when we are actually trying to beta test then there is a need for a locked server.

If you want to take part in it then read my post in the Tactical mode thread.
 
I can't help but feel as if you're taking a passive aggressive attitude Styo. It is indeed a Battle server. I'll take a screenshot of the server list if required, it plainly lists "US_S1" as Battle and that a password has been placed.

There were nK members using bots and running around shooting at each other in a Rhodok vs Nord match. No complaint was ever made about my joining and testing. Please refrain from locking servers at whim in the future?
 
It is Labeled as a Battle server as the new "game mode" has not been added. The only way to play this game mode is with in the battle settings. And actually US_S1 is a TDM server. I change it to Battle.

Correct there were nK and other players in the server using bots running around shooting eachother. If I refrain from locking there server then there will be no one to actually test the bots and this new game mode to its full potential. Again, if you read my thread about the Tactical game mode this thread would not have been made. And i would not be wasting my time posting in it.

If you do not like the fact that I lock a server so players can join it (not only nK) and test the new game mode, there are others servers available to play. If you still have a problem with me locking the server up to test the new game mode as well as bots that i have found with the players that have helped me, then feel free to PM the Devs about it and I will stop my beta testing and leave it to you, since you are so eager to test it.
 
Don't get childish Styo. I merely wanted you to explain yourself here before the rest of the annoyed testers created a ****storm. Cheers
 
I'm not getting childish? In fact how am I getting childish?

You want to play on a Battle server. Well US_S3 was down so you saw US_S1 was a battle server. You want to play battle but you cant cuz it was locked so you made a thread.

Who are the rest of the annoyed testers? Enlighten me.

G'day Sirrah.
 
Styo 说:
If you still have a problem with me locking the server up to test the new game mode as well as bots that i have found with the players that have helped me, then feel free to PM the Devs about it and I will stop my beta testing and leave it to you, since you are so eager to test it.

That is generally accepted in the majority of societies as a childish remark Styo.

The rest of the annoyed testers were with me in the Siege server, who were also making complaining comments. You should have anticipated this. I'm not here to start an e-battle however, so let it lie in my opinion.
 
How is that a childish remark?

I understand that you want to play Battle since the US_S3 is down. However lets say I didnt change that server to Battle and changed it to Conquest and tested it with Conquest. Would this thread have popped up?

I doubt it.  :roll:
 
A server is only temporarily passworded, and someone has to start flinging feces. Look, if you want to play battle, play fight and destroy. It's the same basic game mode. Besides, as I've stated over and over again, other modes need to be tested.
 
When we get some people organized to test the "tactical mode," known as "total war mode" in the Euro server, we try to find a server with no people (or the fewest) and turn it into battle mode.  We put as a password so we can actually test the mode with people who know what they are doing and communicating on ventrilo.  Otherwise random idiots would come in and screw things up.  Our ventrilo is public, so you are more than welcome to come in and play with us when we do tactical mode.  Just don't be an idiot and use teamwork.  And it would be good if you have a mic.  We have many people not in nK (including many AV and Hoboknight clan members) who frequent our vent and play with us a lot in tactical mode.
 
Thornmisfor 说:
I hate to sound like a douche, but that's a public server and no reservation was made. I enjoy testing on the Battle server.

you sound like a douche.  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
US_S1 is not a battle server. It is a Team Deathmatch server. Admins can change the current game mode, and we chose an unpopulated server to test with bots. Unfortunately, it's hard to test the bot commands if there are other players running amok killing them and whatnot. Sorry for the inconvenience, and Styo doesn't intend to offend you I'm sure. Honestly though, taking an empty server at non-peak hours and running a temporary test session isn't what I'd call radically offensive.
 
Anywho lock this thread if you may. Before Noodles decides to set it on fire.  :neutral: (by fire i mean fire thats hot and burns?)
 
Reilnur 说:
A server is only temporarily passworded, and someone has to start flinging feces. Look, if you want to play battle, play fight and destroy. It's the same basic game mode. Besides, as I've stated over and over again, other modes need to be tested.

Other modes are tested with each patch. Maybe you have not thought that people do not play the other game modes because they are not THAT FUN. Battle siege and death match/TDM are probably the best game modes. CTF can be fun but it is kind of ridiculous that one cav just flies by everyone dismounts right next to flag, picks it up and runs off all in less than 2 seconds. As for conquest well, its just silly to have that many flags.. It should be more of a King of the hill type (i realize it is sort of, but this mode needs less flags, so that one side does not win for having that one flag on the other side of the map)

Yes i agree other modes need to be tested, but they are always tested with each patch by people who are bored of battle, want something different, or just want to do something silly. The reason they are not played as extensively as battle/siege/DM is because of the fun factor. Many people leave FnD because of strict settings. (strict camera probably being the most annoying) And even though it is essentially Battle, it probably needs a major overhaul, as with conquest.
 
Halcyon 说:
Reilnur 说:
A server is only temporarily passworded, and someone has to start flinging feces. Look, if you want to play battle, play fight and destroy. It's the same basic game mode. Besides, as I've stated over and over again, other modes need to be tested.

Other modes are tested with each patch. Maybe you have not thought that people do not play the other game modes because they are not THAT FUN. Battle siege and death match/TDM are probably the best game modes. CTF can be fun but it is kind of ridiculous that one cav just flies by everyone dismounts right next to flag, picks it up and runs off all in less than 2 seconds. As for conquest well, its just silly to have that many flags.. It should be more of a King of the hill type (i realize it is sort of, but this mode needs less flags, so that one side does not win for having that one flag on the other side of the map)

Yes i agree other modes need to be tested, but they are always tested with each patch by people who are bored of battle, want something different, or just want to do something silly. The reason they are not played as extensively as battle/siege/DM is because of the fun factor. Many people leave FnD because of strict settings. (strict camera probably being the most annoying) And even though it is essentially Battle, it probably needs a major overhaul, as with conquest.
That.

Then why not test it like some of us do, and report that its not fun so they make it fun. nK has tested the Conquest mode several times. In conclusion we have decided that Conquest playes alot better if the map is bigger. It creates more time to get to the flags and give more time for each team to counter attack.

Beta testing is not about haveing fun only. Yes having fun is important  as thats what keeps players in game. But we are here to test it to make it fun. We all need to test every game mode. I honeslty suggested that we closed every server but conquest for 2-3 days and test it completely.

Battle is played everyday. I honestly dont know what more testing could be done with the Battle mode?
 
Just lock this already, This guy is complaining about people locking a server for TESTING PURPOSES...Why in the world would you call out people for doing what they're supposed to be doing. I commend you on your testing Styo, Keep on the good work!

P.S. Where is your post Styo? I'd like to come help out if possible.
 
http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php/topic,87790.0.html

Theres the thread. I added a poll today, and got a PM from Daegoth that some bugs were fixed so we are gonna lock server again tonight if i can get on and test them out... But actually Orion has the server locked right now and testing it as we speak, hop in vent to join them

Edit: they might be done but you can check  :razz:
 
后退
顶部 底部