[UNAC] United North American Championship
- 主题发起人 Calamity
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
- 状态
Z3ro 说:
Yes, and when is the last time you've heard of that happening in NA? That was an extremely rare circumstance where the round system failed to determine a victor (Because both teams were extremely even) This kind of thing could become the norm in the finals bracket when using sets, however.
Mr.X
John7 说:@ kherv with first to 4 you guys could've came back after that first round loss and went onto a 5th map with sets
@ john first to 4 would've given different results in the first place. And first to 4 is almost always longer than 4 total rounds, so...
Are these rules set in stone? I thought there were things that were still being discussed.
Counting rounds is statistically much less likely to yield ties than counting sets. The odd tie in the round robin will happen if we count rounds, but there will be a lot more if we count sets when there are only a total of 4 set points to distribute. Two teams that are relatively even will often go 1-1 on a map, especially on those with a slightly unbalanced spawn or faction setup.
There really isn't any advantage to counting sets over rounds that I can see. Originally the debate was maps vs rounds, but if we only allow 2 maps to be played, it doesn't make sense to count maps. The same logic applies here.
I know we decided that ties would be acceptable in the round robin, but think about it from the tourney enjoyment standpoint. Players and teams enjoy resolution and being able to say they "won" definitively. If we count sets in a 2-map format, peeps are going to be reporting matches as ties and then justifying it as an unofficial "win" because they scored way more rounds than the other team.
I was originally in favor of counting maps, but that was when there was the possibility of a 3rd map tiebreaker. I do think that 2 maps is fine, and I'm really liking the first to 4 with 4-minute rounds so far. Counting rounds is just much more suitable for this format.
Counting rounds is statistically much less likely to yield ties than counting sets. The odd tie in the round robin will happen if we count rounds, but there will be a lot more if we count sets when there are only a total of 4 set points to distribute. Two teams that are relatively even will often go 1-1 on a map, especially on those with a slightly unbalanced spawn or faction setup.
There really isn't any advantage to counting sets over rounds that I can see. Originally the debate was maps vs rounds, but if we only allow 2 maps to be played, it doesn't make sense to count maps. The same logic applies here.
I know we decided that ties would be acceptable in the round robin, but think about it from the tourney enjoyment standpoint. Players and teams enjoy resolution and being able to say they "won" definitively. If we count sets in a 2-map format, peeps are going to be reporting matches as ties and then justifying it as an unofficial "win" because they scored way more rounds than the other team.
I was originally in favor of counting maps, but that was when there was the possibility of a 3rd map tiebreaker. I do think that 2 maps is fine, and I'm really liking the first to 4 with 4-minute rounds so far. Counting rounds is just much more suitable for this format.
I agree with Green Knight. As far as I know, the rules won't be set in stone until the end of team registration.
FYI Calamity, Rebels and afterwards I think you forgot to include the hyperlinks on the team page, here's the fixed versions (SF excluded cause they didn't put any)
插入代码块:
[b]Team Name:[/b] Rebels
[b]Clan(s) and/or Organization(s) Representing:[/b] Rebels
[b]Captain (with link to TW profile):[/b] [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=283439]Courtney[/url]
[b]Co-Captain (with link to TW profile):[/b] [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=137497]Nevino[/url]
[b]Members (including Captain and Co-Captain):[/b]
1. Courtney
2. Nevino
3. Crusader
4. Templar
5. Xls
6. Athesus
7. Psyko
8. Cdjrcxx
9. Ravenstein
10. Snoop
11. Dag
12. DYLM
13. Latinok
插入代码块:
Clan(s) and/or Organization(s) Representing: TMW
Captain (with link to TW profile): [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=49497]Clockwise[/url]
Co-Captain (with link to TW profile): [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=90302]Unicorn[/url]
Members (including Captain and Co-Captain):
01) Clockwise
02) Unicorn
03) Rurin
04) Beo
05) Maynd
06) Blacktide
07) Sotamursu
08) Mike
09) Volpel
10) Binary
11) MrX
12) Nomnom
13) Kherven
插入代码块:
Team Name: [b]Watchmen of the Morning Twilight (WMT)[/b]
Clan(s) and/or Organization(s) Representing: TMW
Captain (with link to TW profile): [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=110235]Eternal[/url]
Co-Captain (with link to TW profile): [url=http://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?action=profile;u=105610]sammac[/url]
Members (including Captain and Co-Captain):
1. Eternal
2. Sammac
3. Halfdan
4. Antonidas
5. Fiery
6. Warpath
7. Bill
8. Cynthia
9. Buzzlightyear
10. Oodle
11. Devald
12. Scurrilous
13. Quantum
14. Alden
Mok the International
Banned
What the **** link
- 状态
