@Lagstro
Current rules are pretty much that if you share the same name, you are the same team (seed follows the tag). Should wK kick out 80% of its roster, and recruit a bunch of new players to make up the difference, the team that carries the wK tag would still be the #1 seeded clan.
Likewise, if wK divide their clan in half, the team known as "wK" will be the #1 seed, and the other will be forced into the bottom bracket.
Personally, I think the distinction is ridiculous and points out the idiocy behind no seeding for new teams. As much as I tried to bring up examples like what you just stated, everyone wanted to pretend that hb was the only conceivable new team.
What the community has essentially done is create exceptions where they want them, and proclaim "one rule for all" where they don't. GA and GKR, are for all extensive purposes, an infinite number of teams. GA's roster this season, if rumor is to be believed, will be strictly AE. This is very different than their roster last time, and is for all extensive purposes a different team. Likewise, GKR has so many people on their roster that every match might as well be a different team. Hell, they had so many people on their roster that not even they could keep track of who was on it (constantly played people not on roster, including in their match vs BkS).
While I think a seeding exception should be available for GA/AE, the community needs to be honest with themselves and recognize them as a separate team. Likewise, if wK were to ever split their team in half (as they have done in the past), a seeding exception should be available for the segmented team. There is just no reason that a team composed of S1 players should be forced into the bottom bracket.
Unfortunately, as I have said before, people voted with their emotions rather than logic. They saw the matter as just the "hb issue" as opposed to a wider problem. As such, teams are disincentived from dividing and creating new teams as this will condemn one of the teams to the bottom bracket.