UNAC Review with Gelden

正在查看此主题的用户

Volpel 说:
Yeah. Telling who has the most kills and most deaths is useless without some context. For example, Gimli has only 1 less death than CreamPie, so heh.
This!
And she was teamkilled once.In the first round of the scrim when she had 3 kills and that basically got us that round.So it really comes to a luck,nothing else.
So actually i think i only had one death less then her,so please feel free to put me as player with most deaths(i don't care tbh).
This category really is not needed imo.
And here is example why.
We have team A and team B.Team A wins scrim 16-12.So lets say player from team B had 28 deaths and lot of kills.
Ok,lets say team C wins 16-0 against team D.And one player there had 0-16 k/d ratio.
So whats the point of implying player that had 28 deaths and lot of kills is the worst player of the week?
 
Erminas 说:
Volpel 说:
Yeah. Telling who has the most kills and most deaths is useless without some context. For example, Gimli has only 1 less death than CreamPie, so heh.
So whats the point of implying player that had 28 deaths and lot of kills is the worst player of the week?
I believe he said he had the most deaths, not that he was the worst player. That being said you should probably ditch this "most deaths" category, seems to be a bit...uh...****ty. HEY YOU'RE THE FAT GUY! yeah, something like that. I'd lose it if I was you.
 
Snoop 说:
Erminas 说:
Volpel 说:
Yeah. Telling who has the most kills and most deaths is useless without some context. For example, Gimli has only 1 less death than CreamPie, so heh.
So whats the point of implying player that had 28 deaths and lot of kills is the worst player of the week?
I believe he said he had the most deaths, not that he was the worst player. That being said you should probably ditch this "most deaths" category, seems to be a bit...uh...****ty. HEY YOU'RE THE FAT GUY! yeah, something like that. I'd lose it if I was you.
I said implying.
Because the majority will think(without more details added) that player with most deaths was the worst player of the week.And that simply is not true in this case.
 
I don't think anyone would associate most deaths with worst player. A more likely association would be fewest kills but that's not accurate either.

It's just a fun stat to see, nobody should be getting upset over it.
 
more deaths is more getting stuck into the fight and contributing to the team
 
Erminas 说:
This!
And she was teamkilled once.In the first round of the scrim when she had 3 kills and that basically got us that round.So it really comes to a luck,nothing else.
So actually i think i only had one death less then her,so please feel free to put me as player with most deaths(i don't care tbh).
This category really is not needed imo.
And here is example why.
We have team A and team B.Team A wins scrim 16-12.So lets say player from team B had 28 deaths and lot of kills.
Ok,lets say team C wins 16-0 against team D.And one player there had 0-16 k/d ratio.
So whats the point of implying player that had 28 deaths and lot of kills is the worst player of the week?

By that horrible logic, let's not list most kills either. As a caller, I oftentimes put some players (for example, flanking archer) in a far better place to shoot than other players. As such, a simple "most kills" ranking heavily favors that player - even if other players on the team are better skilled!

Furthermore, what if I TK that best archer on my team? That means he can't get kills - lack of context! Remove the stat!

Get over it.
 
Guys it's just a stat..  I feel most deaths is just as important as most kills, it's showing both sides of a coin - albeit a coin that means little  but can be fun to look at.

 
I am right there with you Mad :smile:  But if I don't stop dying, Calamity and Wily will kill me in real life, so I am not dying as much :smile:
 
Updated 3rd OP with Featured Predictors.  Some interesting analysis going on, thanks to Juvenile and Eternal for being the first on the pundit team.

Also updated OP with small changes making it easier to read.
 
I would suggest putting other weeks in spoilers since you don't want it taking too much space especially in weeks 3-4. It's fine now but you're going to run out of space soon :smile:
 
I was wrong in my prediction with DoF. I predicted Rebel would dominate on closed, but DoF would be able to steal some rounds on the open.

Opposite happened.
 
That one was a tough one to call.  Got it wrong on mine too.

Edit: welcome to punditry John
 
Gelden 说:
That one was a tough one to call.  Got it wrong on mine too.

Edit: welcome to punditry John

Yea I think everyone got that one wrong, good job DoF you proved all of us wrong  :smile:

Glad to be on board
 
后退
顶部 底部