
That's because the UN was never intended to take action. The idea behind it was to form an international structure to co-ordinate the action of numerous countries working together. A lot of it's ineffectiveness stems from that, responsibilities that countries didn't want to take got foisted onto the UN as a whole, while the power to actually take meaningful action was retained by the member nations.Úlfheðinn 说:No, I think history has shown us rather well, that the UN is incapable of efficient action...

Archonsod 说:That's because the UN was never intended to take action. The idea behind it was to form an international structure to co-ordinate the action of numerous countries working together. A lot of it's ineffectiveness stems from that, responsibilities that countries didn't want to take got foisted onto the UN as a whole, while the power to actually take meaningful action was retained by the member nations.Úlfheðinn 说:No, I think history has shown us rather well, that the UN is incapable of efficient action...
The security council is a good example.



Yes... Conservatives might want a revolution in another country if it means that they can intervene and help with the "reshaping" of the country. Which is exactly why this is a stupid idea.ealabor 说:Wouldn't any revolutionaries be aggrevated by foreign power intervention? And why specifically is it conservatives wanting a revolution?
Bulle 说:Yes... Conservatives might want a revolution in another country if it means that they can intervene and help with the "reshaping" of the country. Which is exactly why this is a stupid idea.ealabor 说:Wouldn't any revolutionaries be aggrevated by foreign power intervention? And why specifically is it conservatives wanting a revolution?
