I agree with you Terco, this is just another case of gameplay vs. realism. And I believe that in this case realism will make more sense because of the visual stimulance the size, weight etc. a two-handed swords gives. Besides if you carry a one handed sword you can wield a shield if you're having a hard time countering 2handers.If by 2h you refer for example to a long/heavy menavlion, or axe/bardiche; yes... they should be slower. By pure logic of how the weight of the materials affects the handling (I just opened a thread commenting this).
However, there are 2h weapons that for obvious reasons (size, weight, materials) should have an agility in their handling and therefore remain fast. This is the case of the falx and highland two-handed sword; these weapons are (or should be) fast in their handling due to their construction.
Therefore, they should all be slowed down? I say it depends.
I agree with you Terco, this is just another case of gameplay vs. realism. And I believe that in this case realism will make more sense because of the visual stimulance the size, weight etc. a two-handed swords gives. Besides if you carry a one handed sword you can wield a shield if you're having a hard time countering 2handers.
That reason has nothing to do with twohanders having crushthrough and being considered a major **** move to use right now. trust meI call BS on this. There is a reason 1hs are used on the duel server and not 2hs
Don't even put crush in the equation, that garbage doesn't belong on all 2h's. If it's still there by next patch, i really don't know what the **** TW is doing.That reason has nothing to do with twohanders having crushthrough and being considered a major **** move to use right now. trust me
and most competitive players will practice with 1handers because its a more useful skill for them to have.
Most of the people on duel are competitive players.Don't even put crush in the equation, that garbage doesn't belong on all 2h's. If it's still there by next patch, i really don't know what the **** TW is doing.
I'm not talking about competitive players. I'm talking about duels in general. In warband you had a big amount of players playing with a 2h despite it being complete **** in competitive.
Bannerlord isn't being used by either
Bannerlord isn't being used by either
I respect that you think that; but let me tell you that you cannot imagine how light this weapon is. I think those weapon values are within plausible terrain; maybe the problem is the class itself which is too fast?Falx is the most broken weapon imo atm. 105 speed is absurd, especially with the speed of the troop using it. You can spam any class, especially with the animation glitch. Some guy yesterday used falx and animation glitch and killed 3 guys (including me) just in the durations of our attack animation. It was so weird.
I respect that you think that; but let me tell you that you cannot imagine how light this weapon is. I think those weapon values are within plausible terrain; maybe the problem is the class itself which is too fast?
Notice how little force compensates in recovery (yes, this is very geeky )
Once again, realism excuse on a game is a terrible argument. Not only is this game far from being realistic, but gameplay should be above "realism". You can't have a Fast, Long, and Strong weapon at the same time, it's simply broken.
On warband of bannerlord?Most of the people on duel are competitive players.
Once again, realism excuse on a game is a terrible argument. Not only is this game far from being realistic, but gameplay should be above "realism". You can't have a Fast, Long, and Strong weapon at the same time, it's simply broken.
I cant speak for everyone but I use 1hs over 2hs on duel because I like the feints better and I'd rather not be a beyblade with a 2hI call BS on this. There is a reason 1hs are used on the duel server and not 2hs