andycott
Sergeant
?
Two-handed swords have an upper-hand comparing to one-handed, because two-handers have more flexibility in use, as they can be used both as one-handed (with shield) and two-handed (more damage).
In my experience two-handed weapons are cheaper than one-handed with similar stats, which has absolutely no sense. If they had significant penalties in speed when being used as one-handed, than everything would have been in right place. But with current stats it is logical to be vice versa - two-handed weapons should cost more than one-handed.
Two-handed swords have an upper-hand comparing to one-handed, because two-handers have more flexibility in use, as they can be used both as one-handed (with shield) and two-handed (more damage).
In my experience two-handed weapons are cheaper than one-handed with similar stats, which has absolutely no sense. If they had significant penalties in speed when being used as one-handed, than everything would have been in right place. But with current stats it is logical to be vice versa - two-handed weapons should cost more than one-handed.
Last edited:
