TW Sponsored WFaS Tournaments, not Warband?

[Godnoken]

Yeah, some cheating protection would be very nice.

I have only met one guy that i'm pretty sure he used autoblock on Nditions and maybe another guy with some kind of aimbot (6 arrows, 6 headshots in one round..)
The autoblock I saw was when this guy kept blocking down and then block in another direction when I swung.

 

[cmpxchg8b]

Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical about the whole "working with Valve against cheating".
Right now one can make an auto-block hack by adding one line of code to the module system TW provides... maybe start by fixing that?

Apart from that, the worst thing that happened to Warband is when they decided not to break network compatibility any more. As if hosters/players cared more about not having to update than getting new features and fixes.

 

[captain lust]

Apart from that, the worst thing that happened to Warband is when they decided not to break network compatibility any more. As if hosters/players cared more about not having to update than getting new features and fixes.

This.

Lots of the servers still run Vincenzo's Admin Mod, which is essentially 1.134 and lacking in lots of item value changes. Some quite important, including the unbalancing of long nord 2h axes. It also misses the moneyquitting fix, which I think is quite important.

 

[orangeknite1]

Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical about the whole "working with Valve against cheating".
Right now one can make an auto-block hack by adding one line of code to the module system TW provides... maybe start by fixing that?

Apart from that, the worst thing that happened to Warband is when they decided not to break network compatibility any more. As if hosters/players cared more about not having to update than getting new features and fixes.

You probably shouldn't have told people how easy to do it is, and how to basically do it.

 

[Alex_C]

Honestly, I'm a bit skeptical about the whole "working with Valve against cheating".
Right now one can make an auto-block hack by adding one line of code to the module system TW provides... maybe start by fixing that?

Apart from that, the worst thing that happened to Warband is when they decided not to break network compatibility any more. As if hosters/players cared more about not having to update than getting new features and fixes.

You probably shouldn't have told people how easy to do it is, and how to basically do it.

That is by no stretch telling people how to do it, don't be ridiculous.

 

[orangeknite1]

Yes but still some clever people could figure out how to do it from what you said.

 

[Alex_C]

Yes but still some clever people could figure out how to do it from what you said.

You mean the kind of people who'd already know how to do it?

 

[orangeknite1]

Yes but still some clever people could figure out how to do it from what you said.

You mean the kind of people who'd already know how to do it?

True That

 

[Birdtalon]

Warband is far better than WFaS in my opinion anyway.

If they want community loyalty then they should satisfy old players before rushing onto something new.

 

[Alex_C]

Regarding things which could be improved or what-not:

I was wondering whether it'd be possible for a server command something like set_randomize_maps, working like set_randomize_factions from a defined pool of maps. As far as I know, there isn't currently a way to have your maps not just running on a cycle?

I have no idea as to the feasibility of this or such, so if it's a stupid suggestion, many apologies.

 

[Mr.X]

Regarding things which could be improved or what-not:

I was wondering whether it'd be possible for a server command something like set_randomize_maps, working like set_randomize_factions from a defined pool of maps. As far as I know, there isn't currently a way to have your maps not just running on a cycle?

I have no idea as to the feasibility of this or such, so if it's a stupid suggestion, many apologies.

It's not random?

 

[MadocComadrin]

Nope.

 

[Alex_C]

Regarding things which could be improved or what-not:

I was wondering whether it'd be possible for a server command something like set_randomize_maps, working like set_randomize_factions from a defined pool of maps. As far as I know, there isn't currently a way to have your maps not just running on a cycle?

I have no idea as to the feasibility of this or such, so if it's a stupid suggestion, many apologies.

It's not random?

Nope, the server runs through the maps in the order you put them in the config file. I guess you could make it seem more random by having a very long list that cycles through each map several times, each time with the maps in a different order.

 

[MadocComadrin]

Apart from that, the worst thing that happened to Warband is when they decided not to break network compatibility any more. As if hosters/players cared more about not having to update than getting new features and fixes.

This this this this this. It's so frustrating. There are so many events we could use for native compatible mods that the devs won't include due to this.

 

[brognar]

Some official WB servers would be nice
i wanna play CTF

 

[MadocComadrin]

They might have been moved to WFaS, but the US_# and EU_# servers are all official servers.

 

[Orion]

They might have been moved to WFaS

They most certainly were. I've checked myself.

Still no news from Yazzy.

 

[Mr.X]

They might have been moved to WFaS

They most certainly were. I've checked myself.

Still no news from Yazzy.

Well it's not like they were being used by the Warband community anyway. TW can put their servers where they want.