Before you ask, no I am not coming back to Warband John. I'll just stick to laughing at the bannerlord complaints on the forum thanks xoxo
give a cash prize to the player with most teamkillsGame's dead and lacking interest, needs something to spice it up.
not if you make the tournament 6v6. this way you can get at least 5-6 good teams who all have the possibility to winLet's be honest, only two teams could potentially win the prize anyway so it won't bring more players.
Still waiting for the 100 euroes from the last tournament that was sponsored by an idividual
not if you make the tournament 6v6. this way you can get at least 5-6 good teams who all have the possibility to win
not if you make the tournament 6v6. this way you can get at least 5-6 good teams who all have the possibility to win
yeah: OIDA and FT1 FT25-6 is ambitious but you could definitely get 3 teams with a good chance of winning in a 6v6 tourney
If there is a roster limit teams will have to split. This could mean there would be Unity, FT, OIDA (Dopey), Malta?, FT 2, Turkish Team and maybe AE if they would sign up which I doubt5-6 is ambitious but you could definitely get 3 teams with a good chance of winning in a 6v6 tourney
I fully understand the reasoning and I have been a huge advocate of small rosters for competitive events but having only two subs with the current activity in the scene would put a high number of team at a risk of dropping out. Not every teams can afford 8 very active players, some will always need to juggle between several players with different availabilities.6v6 with 8 man roster caps seems good to me
But if we don't have roster caps we will see the same teams sign up again and the tournament will most likely end with the same 2 teams playing eachother in the finals.I fully understand the reasoning and I have been a huge advocate of small rosters for competitive events but having only two subs with the current activity in the scene would put a high number of team at a risk of dropping out. Not every teams can afford 8 very active players, some will always need to juggle between several players with different availabilities.
I like the idea but eventually I feel it should have been enforced way before and could do more bad than good in our current scene.
I dont mind it being 8 or 9 but just have a reasonable roster cap. I don't want to see div A teams with 15 playersHave an 8 man roster cap for div A, and 10 for Div B and C
This.Have an 8 man roster cap for div A, and 10 for Div B and C