JACVBHINDS // 寒心420? 说:Blas de Lezo y Olavarrieta de Cartagena de Indias 说:An armoured column attacks a fortified position attempting to breakthrough and destroy the shield generator. Rebels call for air support to deal with the "tanks" - it makes plenty sense to me.
There's a trench of infantry defending against nothing but giant walkers which it's established they can't damage. They're only there to give the walkers something to shoot at, and to provide a ticking clock for Luke to be rushing against. Better stop those walkers before they massacre the good guys, etc.
A trench of infantry defending against something they can't really damage is something that's happened before in reality, though, for lots of reasons. It's kind of why armoured spearheads were so effective at breaking through fortified positions. It's almost like that was their entire operational role!
In any case, with the editing and such, it's hardly something unique to star wars, especially movies made in that time. Newer star wars movies get into the grit of it because technology is better... though it's partly why they tend to be worse.
JACVBHINDS // 寒心420? 说:Star wars is a film franchise, and one that's so iconic and regularly imitated and parodied that barely anything can be changed without it starting to look a bit silly. The overwhelming majority of people haven't watched or read any expanded universe stuff, and the expanded universe is barely thematically related to the films anyway because star wars does not have a compelling or expansive background. It's just good vs evil in space with a little bit of Kung Fu.kalarhan 说:Some people view of SW is limited to a few movies
You're right, it's only the most expansive fictional universe literally ever created.
It's not good and evil so much as two opposite extremes on the usage of the force - and both extremes are ****ing horrible. The best force-users in terms of being decent people are the ones who don't align with either side, the Grey Jedi, they're also the most interesting characters. Luke is one. Qui-Gon was one (okay he wasn't that interesting in the movie but he's better out of it). Obi-Wan was one because he was taught by Qui-Gon.
It's just my interpretation I guess but Star Wars is an endless story about a galaxy where constant apocalyptic-scale warfare (on a scale even 40k can't match) will simply never end, because the Force and the philosophies that attempt to guide the usage of it are eternal and drive every conflict. It's pretty hopeless and dark if you actually think about it. People like to say Star Wars is all noblebright and happy idealism but they forget that the movies are literally a tragedy story. I'm not saying grimdark is inherently compelling writing, but it shows that there are layers to this thing.
The problem with the EU is that 75% of it is poorly-written Mary Sue garbage written by people who don't really understand it, and can't write at all to begin with, the remaining 25% is extremely good. Admiral Thrawn is perhaps one of the best antagonists I've ever seen in a book. The problem is not "put lightsabers in it and it's star wars" it's actually a pretty complicated setting and most people familiar with it don't seem to be aware of it.
On the note of George Lucas and Scifi, it should be understood that A) star wars is not sci-fi, it is space fantasy, and B) George Lucas had very little to do, creatively, with much of the original trilogy. He didn't even direct two of the movies.
/off-topic rant over




