what a dumb logic - comparing popularity with jumping off a bridge
tho, I didn't expect anything smart from a turkophobe like you
You'd totally jump off the bridge with them, got it.
And wait, I'm a what now?
what a dumb logic - comparing popularity with jumping off a bridge
tho, I didn't expect anything smart from a turkophobe like you
You're a definition of the Dunning–Kruger effectYou'd totally jump off the bridge with them, got it.
And wait, I'm a what now?
You're just throwing insults around until you find one that sticks. Are you still sore about the argument you had last year with Ser Jon where you denied the Armenian genocide? Stop trying to start ****.You're a definition of the Dunning–Kruger effect
the dude sitting here for years, whining about how bad this game is with 1.5k comments - I was just pointing to the true source of his hateYou're just throwing insults around until you find one that sticks. Are you still sore about the argument you had last year with Ser Jon where you denied the Armenian genocide? Stop trying to start ****.
Bannerlord's Steam reviews are average by Steam standards. Someone posted the statistics for Steam reviews and 85% is literally average, a game has to be outright bad to get "Mixed" reviews and totally unplayable broken to get "Negative" reviews.They're right tho, reviews are amazing
Clear based on what?and it's clear a majority of people outside forums actually love the game flaws and all
Because there's a lot of problems with the game.People just get stuck in a negative feed back loop here.
The problem is Warband is still a more functional game in many aspects than Bannerlord.Tons of improvements can and should be made but I still see it as a cult classic type of game in the future, same as Warband.
>"It's not just Steam" - proceeds to list Steam twiceIt's not just steam reviews most reviewers across the board are positive about the game, hell the reviews on the console game pages for xbox and Playstation, steam, gog, pcgamer, metacritic, general Google reviews all positive. That's a ton of people. More people like the game than hate it and its funny so many people here do nothing except full time **** on the game and think innovation is bad. Like outside these forums people still enjoy the game lol everyone out here just confirming their own biasis to each other and not looking at all the sources. Warband is objectively worse in every way its hilarious people still clinging with white knuckles to that concept but Bannerlord is obviously better eye test and reviews can confirm that.
You're a definition of the Dunning–Kruger effect
the dude sitting here for years, whining about how bad this game is with 1.5k comments - I was just pointing to the true source of his hate
You're just throwing insults around until you find one that sticks. Are you still sore about the argument you had last year with Ser Jon where you denied the Armenian genocide? Stop trying to start ****.
They're right tho, reviews are amazing and it's clear a majority of people outside forums actually love the game flaws and all. People just get stuck in a negative feed back loop here. Tons of improvements can and should be made but I still see it as a cult classic type of game in the future, same as Warband.
Ya I included steam in my list, no one asked me to provide links, you did the same with your halfass attempt to provide sources for negative reviews "ign, and rps or whatever" way more people are reviewing it with higher scores.>"It's not just Steam" - proceeds to list Steam twice
>Repeating yourself with no source after being asked for a source
I don't really think it's "broken" like after full release it's literally more playable than it's ever been. It barely crashes anymore (not MP) and it's running like butter now for the most part. They've added subtle things with bandit party voice acting and probably more that i havent caught yet. Reviews don't mean everything but depending on the sample size they are a good indication for the avg consumer about product satisfaction. Sample size for Bannerlord reviews is pretty large and its a safe bet to assume its a good game for new players. I agree with most of the reviews.I wouldn't say "Very Positive", a common thing for video games on Steam, is "amazing". Beyond that, it doesn't really prove anything at the end of the day. It's not a garbage game by any means, of course, but it is ultimately unimpressive and does nothing special. The huge list of incomplete or broken features, bugs, broken MP and lifelessness, and even the mid to late game being nonexistence, is not good. It's meh at best. And the fact that you even said "despite its flaws and all" proves that.
And it's not that there's some negative loop because people just want to **** on the game. If it seems like repetition in these statements, it is because for over two years now, the development team has treated the backbone of their community like garbage and ignored every little thing said to them in order to push this game to consoles and to casualize it for a greater audience (thus a greater appeasement). People want it to succeed, so they will try to do that by the only means available to them. Is it probably pointless now? Yea, TW seems more than happy with the cash they got from the broken game they shipped.
I've seen some **** games get amazing reviews on Steam, by the way. It's not really a mark of greatness just because people dropped a review on it.
I don't really think it's "broken" like after full release it's literally more playable than it's ever been. It barely crashes anymore (not MP) and it's running like butter now for the most part. They've added subtle things with bandit party voice acting and probably more that i havent caught yet. Reviews don't mean everything but depending on the sample size they are a good indication for the avg consumer about product satisfaction. Sample size for Bannerlord reviews is pretty large and its a safe bet to assume its a good game for new players. I agree with most of the reviews.
It's not just steam reviews most reviewers across the board are positive about the game, hell the reviews on the console game pages for xbox and Playstation, steam, gog, pcgamer, metacritic, general Google reviews all positive. That's a ton of people. More people like the game than hate it and its funny so many people here do nothing except full time **** on the game and think innovation is bad. Like outside these forums people still enjoy the game lol everyone out here just confirming their own biasis to each other and not looking at all the sources.
Ya more people come all the time it's the nature of being online. Why alienate new players and new people who don't agree? I've played since Warband. I've played, Pendor and Perisno and Fire and Sword, all those gotdam game of thrones mods. Obviously everyone is here because they are passionate and opinionated about the game, it's always good to have differing opinions. Just saying the echo chamber in here you think is the norm for opinions about the game, is not the case for the majority of people that play these games.Know your audience. The majority of people who discuss Bannerlord on this forum have been here at least two years now, since the launch of EA. Of those, a considerable proportion played Warband and other licensed titles like Napoleonic Wars years before Bannerlord's EA launch.
Most of those reviews are from people who have 5-10 hours, got the game ooooh shiny! And dropped it to go back to fortnite when they got bored. Steam reviews are a completely and totally worthless way to measure the health of a game, franchise and company.They're right tho, reviews are amazing and it's clear a majority of people outside forums actually love the game flaws and all.
You could say that again.Tons of improvements can and should be made
but I still see it as a cult classic type of game in the future, same as Warband.
Ya more people come all the time it's the nature of being online. Why alienate new players and new people who don't agree? I've played since Warband. I've played, Pendor and Perisno and Fire and Sword, all those gotdam game of thrones mods. Obviously everyone is here because they are passionate and opinionated about the game, it's always good to have differing opinions. Just saying the echo chamber in here you think is the norm for opinions about the game, is not the case for the majority of people that play these games.
Dude read the previous comments it's not just steam. I mentioned some other places to look. Many opinions exist out there.I like stats. So I looked at Steam ratings on Bannerlord. The average for a game is 85% (another stat source says 86%).
The Bannerlord rating in the last year from English speakers is 83% (slightly BELOW average), but 87% (slightly ABOVE average) for ALL languages.
Obviously non-English players rated it a lot better, some of them Turks and many of them Chinese. I'm not sure why!
The fact is, the game is rated as average and you can't say "but the Steam reviews are good" just because Steam uses nice words and big-looking ratings.
My numbers are from the last December till now, a year-worth of ratings (last 6 months ratings are even worse). You can see it for yourself if you click around on the graphs. The recent ones are all from console noobs, they are happy they got the game at all.Dude read the previous comments it's not just steam. I mentioned some other places to look. Many opinions exist out there.
Also just checked steam is 87% very positive all time and 92% very positive recent. So your numbers are off by a lot.
Steam reviews are PC. Recent reviews are probably just people getting it on full release. Ya reddit has a lot of that...I might be guilty of trying to kill good Ole Nadea myself and perusing reddit for the info lol. But reddit bannerlord is also people just playing and having fun and posting there experiences or asking questions and making discoveries. Like everyone here thinks never happens. See a bunch of people posting interesting stuff that happens in their games all the time.The recent ones are all from console noobs, they are happy they got the game at all.
I also follow Reddit comments and they are not "very positive". Most of them are about how to kill your wife anyway or problems with the game.
The steam reviews aren't going to show that the game is perfect, but what it is going to show that most people don't think the game sucks. The entire idea that people hate the game which has been thrown around a lot. And there is a pretty big difference between average and sucks. Obviously, never settle for average when you can be great, but this constant argument that the game sucks and people actually hate it does fall apart when the majority of reviews for the game tends to be positive.The fact is, the game is rated as average and you can't say "but the Steam reviews are good" just because Steam uses nice words and big-looking ratings.
And? They like the game, so what? What makes them any lesser beyond the fact that they use a console?The recent ones are all from console noobs, they are happy they got the game at all.