Humlenerd said:
Tiberius Decimus Maximus said:
Ivan the Awesome said:
In an era where human rights were unknown, the Turks were fantastic pioneers in the art of inflicting massive human suffering and death. Not saying that the rest of the world was good, look at the British massacres of protestors, the Russian revolution, the Hungarian revolution which the Russians put down, and many other incidents. However, the Ottomans were hardly innocent, in fact they were really really bad.
Well, hardly. This kind of stuff goes way back before the great revolutions of the 19th century. A great example is the 30 Years War, or the Conquest of Ireland, for the 17th Century. Or further back, the depredations of the Crusades.
I think when people look back on specific events in history, such as this one at Chios, or the Holocaust, we forget our rich human history of large scale massacres and genocide.
The difference between Turkish history and other people's history is that they(other people) accept what they've done. They don't try to hide it or write "altvernative history". I haven't met one Englishman who denies the massacre(and slave trade) of Irish people.
Denial makes it worse.
Unfortunately, the average English education will
not detail Ireland and it's backlog of massacres at the bloody-hand of England. The closest we came was a very brief (literally, a couple of minutes) overview of the Siege of Drogheda and it's relevance within the
English Civil War, as opposed to any possible ramification upon the Irish population. Nor are we taught of the Irish Confederate Wars, or typically of any English involvement with Ireland beyond the framework. Ignorance is as damaging as denial. Part of me suspects that this dark period is skipped over in English educationn due to continual ongoing problems in Ireland.
This is unless of course the National Curriculum has changed in the past eight years since I left formal education.
(Sorry Doc, I had to reply to this post. I'll leave the thread in peace!)