The Man that Must Change China (recent Economist essay)

正在查看此主题的用户

MadVader 说:
So, yeah, the rise of China.
While running around in panic and asking people "omg, what are we gonna do??", is certainly human (or at least anthropoid :grin:) response, do you see opportunities and not only challenges?

Its all scientific Radar. Something that a layman such as yourself is probably challenged to comprehend.

saupload_syndrome3.jpg
 
Personally, what I think the US has to do is drag China into all of those entangling instiutions and alliances in the area. That way, they won't feel threatened by encirclement and will also have a way to resolve regional disputes in an established setting. This strategy is being pursued already, but it's been hard to get China to play nice.
 
Sounds to me like the big-swinging Wangs in Beijing are not particularly likely to promote reforms. Ah well, maybe in another 10 years.

http://www.economist.com/news/china/21566685-china-shuffles-its-leadership-putting-princeling-command-changing-guard

FOR the first time since the death of Mao Zedong in 1976, China’s most important reins of power have been handed over at the same time to a single man: Xi Jinping (pictured, centre, above). The decision, revealed on November 15th, that Hu Jintao has stepped down not only as the Communist Party’s general secretary, but also as head of China’s army, was part of the biggest shake-up of the party’s leadership in a decade. But, although Mr Xi now has the titles of power, his ability to use them will be heavily constrained. . . .

. Not since Hua Guofeng took over on Mao’s death have both jobs been transferred simultaneously.

Hua turned out to be little more than a transitional figure. Few people expect Mr Xi to be the same. But his new jobs by no means give him absolute power. Crucially, his two predecessors, Mr Hu and Mr Jiang, are still alive. Both will wield considerable influence: Mr Jiang, at the age of 86, probably even more than the 69-year-old Mr Hu. The membership of the Politburo Standing Committee, the party’s ruling body, bears Mr Jiang’s imprint. Mr Xi and the man expected to succeed Wen Jiabao as prime minister next March, Li Keqiang, are the only two left from the outgoing committee, which has been reduced from nine members to seven. Of the five newcomers, all but one are considered to be protégés of Mr Jiang. . . .

The body’s new membership does not suggest any clear policy shift. Reformers will be disappointed at the omission of two men once thought frontrunners for elevation: the party chief of Guangdong province, Wang Yang, and the head of the party’s Organisation Department, Li Yuanchao. Both are seen as Mr Hu’s men and are reputed to be relatively liberal.

None of this necessarily means that Mr Xi will shy away from economic, or even political, reforms. Mr Hu has been widely criticised by liberals in China for letting reforms stagnate, especially in his second term. Some allow themselves a smidgen of hope that Mr Xi may prove bolder. As a “princeling”, the child of a senior leader, Mr Xi is assumed to be rather more self-confident than Mr Hu. His father was close to Mao (until he fell out with him), as well as to Deng. This gives Mr Xi clout that Mr Hu, a commoner, lacked in his dealings with China’s ruling families.

Mr Xi offered little evidence of such confidence, however, in his remarks to journalists after the rubber-stamping of his appointment by the party’s newly chosen 376-member central committee. He seemed relaxed and upbeat in his delivery (in the purest Mandarin tones of any of China’s supreme leaders since the party came to power in 1949). But his comments were bland. After a year of huge scandal, involving the purge of a Politburo member, Bo Xilai, for alleged corruption and complicity in the cover-up of a murder, Mr Xi referred only briefly to the “serious challenges” the party now faces, including that of corruption and becoming “divorced from the people”. He took no questions.

Seems likely that Deofuta pretty much pegged it

Deofuta 说:
Xi is a relatively unknown figure, even in the Party. However, he was placed into this position of power by the more politically conservative Jiang Zemin. The standing committee is also more of a politically conservative taste, with preference towards a nontransparent government. After Hu Jintao's long stance of rule based in harmony and (some) consensus for change.

So, I expect that economic factors will continue to take precedence, and expect very little in terms of political change.
[/quote
 
We got to be patient.  Most Chinese see how their fellow cousins have fared in Hong Kong and Taiwan.  They want the same.  Travel to and from these places are occuring on a non restricted basis.  The mainlanders deep down know they want the same.  The CCP leadership most likely observes this too.  Hopefully they can follow the Taiwan model, and the world just need to be a bit patient and try to steer them (not antagonize them) in the right direction.
 
If Chiang Kai-shek or even Dr. Sun were alive today, they probably would not be in disagreement with how China is now headed.  Basically, a more assertive China (ie free of foreign domination),  along with the capability to provide a livelihood for its people had always been their desire since the founding of the republic in 1911.
 
Although, and let's be honest here, Chiang Kai-Shek isn't responsible for the success of the Taiwan of today, and likely would not have been able to produce its success in China, had the Nationalists remained in power there.
 
Even he would have succeed if he had patiently followed the principles of Sun Tzu.
“When strong, avoid the Turks. If of high morale, tell them about the fall of the Ottomans. Seem humble to fill them with conceit. If at ease, exhaust them with EU demands. If united, separate them from the Kurds and the Armenians. Attack their weaknesses: smoking, sweets and genocide. Emerge to their surprise, ideally naked from a Turkish bath.”

These sound principles apply equally to game design.
 
MadVader 说:
Even he would have succeed if he had patiently followed the principles of Sun Tzu.
“When strong, avoid the Turks. If of high morale, tell them about the fall of the Ottomans. Seem humble to fill them with conceit. If at ease, exhaust them with EU demands. If united, separate them from the Kurds and the Armenians. Attack their weaknesses: smoking, sweets and genocide. Emerge to their surprise, ideally naked from a Turkish bath.”

These sound principles apply equally to game design.

That was a good one Vadar.
 
后退
顶部 底部