The European Union. Everyone keep calm. Be civil.

Users who are viewing this thread

BenKenobi said:
Press release for AG Sanchéz-Bordona's opinion on the possibility of unilateral revocation of Article 50 procedure (ie. Britain stopping Brexit on its own) has been published.

https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-12/cp180187en.pdf

AG argues that Article 50 TEU allows the unilateral revocation of the notification of the intention to withdraw from the EU, until such time as the withdrawal agreement is formally concluded, provided that the revocation has been decided upon in accordance with the Member State’s constitutional requirements, is formally notified to the European Council and does not involve an abusive practice.

While I've grown fond of the idea of the UK ****ing off, I must say that the idea of them revoking Art. 50 procedure and thus effectively accomplishing absolutely nothing is equally appealing.
My initial reaction is **** this this is too generous, but **** me Advocate General just dad'd me. EU judicial institutions are serious ****.
 
Calradianın Bilgesi said:
why is it funny??
Because this theater play is getting more and more absurd  :grin:

On the substance, I more or less agree with Joseph Weiler's opinion that a potential Britain's decision to remain could be disastrous for the EU and therefore such an unconditional possibility of revocation can be a bad idea. On the other hand, while not disputing that I know jack **** about UK politics, I don't think May (or the next Government) would really go that far and opt to remain. So, maybe, in the end it was a good thing - the EU offered a helping hand in a decision that is based more or less solely on respect for democracy and Brexit-leaders can claim they really followed the people's wishes since they took the Brexit even though there was another way out. Win win. Maybe.



Hehe

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46509288

 
Eurostat stats for granting international protection for 2018 and the Czech republic is in the lead with whopping 11,2% success rate before the administrative bodies! *

Distribution_of_first_instance_decisions_on_%28non-EU%29_asylum_applications%2C_2018_%28%25%29_YB19_3.png

Funny thing is that in quite a few countries, judicial review of asylum and other instruments of international protection is limited to an annulment of a decision of the administrative body and returning the case to them for further proceedings. However, it happens that the executive disregards the reasoning of the court and refuse to grant international protection without remedying the flaws outlined by the court (I know it happened in Hungary, Slovakia and Czech Republic; but I would guess it just happens from time to time in every jurisdiction with a cassation principle in regards to these proceedings). However, recent opinion of an Advocate General of the CJEU hints that EU law may entitle the judiciary to disregard the domestic legislation and grant the refugee status even without any legal basis to do so in the domestic legal order  :grin:

* it, however, needs to be mentioned that the most of the claims come from nationals of countries such as Ukraine and Georgie that are considered to be safe countries.
 
Von der Leyen narrowly elected the president of the European Commission, becoming the first German and the first woman in charge of the EU. In spite of controversies surrounding her, be it in regards to German Bundeswehr or the nomination process resulting in a death of the short-lived (and fairly problematic) Spitzenkandidat system, here is to hoping she will prove to be a good leader.
 
https://www.helsinki.hu/en/disciplinary-action-threatens-judge-for-turning-to-cjeu

A worthy contestant in the most absurd thing competition: Hungary launched a disciplinary proceedings against its own judge for referring preliminary questions regarding, inter alia, independence of Hungarian judiciary to the Court of Justice of the EU. Hungarians claim that by doing so, the judge violated dignity of the judiciary.

This is going even further than before when the Hungarian Supreme Court ruled that this reference to the CJEU was illegal as the questions were irrelevant to the case at hand (despite having no jurisdiction at all to rule on such a thing).

Ultimately, this can end with an infringement proceedings launched against Hungary by the European Commission as just a year ago, France was found liable for its court not referencing a question to the CJEU.

What is so strikingly absurd about this is that it is basically a state telling its courts not to carry out their duties coming from the state's international obligations and constitutional order. Uh.
 
Is there any reason as to why GUE-NGL/PEL has so few supporters of the EU? I hear the argument "EU is a failed free trade capitalist organisation" and I understand their crude reasoning, but why not use it to your advantage to get ahead? Frankly, I find the EU to be quite useful both in daily life and as a body for implementing the reforms that my party so fervently promote.
 
The EU is simply trash. Its' monetary system is built to benefit the central countries (aka germany) and to screw over the marginal ones (aka greece, spain).
 
Is there any reason as to why GUE-NGL/PEL has so few supporters of the EU? I hear the argument "EU is a failed free trade capitalist organisation" and I understand their crude reasoning, but why not use it to your advantage to get ahead? Frankly, I find the EU to be quite useful both in daily life and as a body for implementing the reforms that my party so fervently promote.
How can thinly veiled tankies take advantage of a free-trade block's institutions to get ahead?
 
By using the parliament as a way of spreading their cause, with the amount of seats making it possible for more socialist-leaning laws than now? The Euroskeptics have definitely used this tactic despite their stance.
 
Back
Top Bottom