Thought it would be interesting, after all the talk we hear about "so and so team has x cav, y archers, z inf", to set up a centralized place where people can have a chance to give their opinions and maybe discuss them some, as discussion is the entire point of this board.
Example:
Team
Inf Score: A-F
Reasoning
Cav Score: A-F
Reasoning
Bow / Crossbow Score: A-F
Reasoning
Code here:
Really, I'd like to see every team included here. However, I know that's a big task for some of you and a lot of you are allergic to anything that takes longer than ten seconds to do. So, it's really up to you how many teams you want to do, how you want to divide it, or if you want to do all of them. Feel free to do the top 4, the top 8, the bottom 2, or just the teams that you have the most experience playing against or watching. Obvious sarcastic responses will be crushed mercilessly under the flaming modhammer of justice.
In regards to how grading is standardized, in the context of this thread, I think it's best for discussion to keep it in the context of this tournament. The worst that you've seen in the tournament is going to recieve and F in that department, and the best that you've seen is an A.
For example, if I feel that GKR has the best infantry in the tournament, they clearly have an A. If I feel that TMW's infantry is the worst, they obviously are recieving an F. The other clans fall somewhere in between there, and I like using the grading system as opposed to the numbering system of #1, #2, #3 etc because a grading system only requires two linear boundaries, that being the best and the worst, and the others are allowed to have some overlap which is very good for these kind of rankings. Do not just hand out A's, B's and C's out of courtesy, as the point here is using the standards set by the worst and the best, where do the others fall and who are the standard setters the boundaries and why? What made clan Y edge clan Z for the best and why do they set the standard? What about clan A puts them at the bottom of the ranged heap, what needs to be done to correct it? This is supposed to be a respectfully done thread and discussion, but it's also pointless if people are using B as average, because it isn't:
A
B
C
D
F
To help clarify and give guidelines, but these aren't absolutes either:
A is the best. B is above average. is C is average. D is below average. F is the worst.
Example:
Team
Inf Score: A-F
Reasoning
Cav Score: A-F
Reasoning
Bow / Crossbow Score: A-F
Reasoning
Code here:
插入代码块:
[i][b]Team[/b][/i]
[u]Inf Score:[/u] A-F
Reasoning
[u]Cav Score:[/u] A-F
Reasoning
[u]Bow / Crossbow Score:[/u] A-F
ReasoningReally, I'd like to see every team included here. However, I know that's a big task for some of you and a lot of you are allergic to anything that takes longer than ten seconds to do. So, it's really up to you how many teams you want to do, how you want to divide it, or if you want to do all of them. Feel free to do the top 4, the top 8, the bottom 2, or just the teams that you have the most experience playing against or watching. Obvious sarcastic responses will be crushed mercilessly under the flaming modhammer of justice.
In regards to how grading is standardized, in the context of this thread, I think it's best for discussion to keep it in the context of this tournament. The worst that you've seen in the tournament is going to recieve and F in that department, and the best that you've seen is an A.
For example, if I feel that GKR has the best infantry in the tournament, they clearly have an A. If I feel that TMW's infantry is the worst, they obviously are recieving an F. The other clans fall somewhere in between there, and I like using the grading system as opposed to the numbering system of #1, #2, #3 etc because a grading system only requires two linear boundaries, that being the best and the worst, and the others are allowed to have some overlap which is very good for these kind of rankings. Do not just hand out A's, B's and C's out of courtesy, as the point here is using the standards set by the worst and the best, where do the others fall and who are the standard setters the boundaries and why? What made clan Y edge clan Z for the best and why do they set the standard? What about clan A puts them at the bottom of the ranged heap, what needs to be done to correct it? This is supposed to be a respectfully done thread and discussion, but it's also pointless if people are using B as average, because it isn't:
A
B
C
D
F
To help clarify and give guidelines, but these aren't absolutes either:
A is the best. B is above average. is C is average. D is below average. F is the worst.
