Right, so the other guy wasn't generalizing a populace when he called people "Fanboys". Where were you when they needed you white knight? Oh yeah, no where to be found. But you certainly felt the need to come after me. How very fair, unbiased and not hypocritical of you. Or perhaps you should have just minded your own business? But continue to waste time in this thread and blame it on me lol.
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Taleworlds, where is the Transparency & Communication? :(
- Thread starter Wulfrik The Wanderer
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Right, so the other guy wasn't generalizing a populace when he called people "Fanboys". Where were you when they needed you white knight? Oh yeah, no where to be found. But you certainly felt the need to come after me. How very fair, unbiased and not hypocritical of you. Or perhaps you should have just minded your own business? But continue to waste time in this thread and blame it on me lol.
I never said I agreed with him(I will say I do though), but I also never found a reason to interfere as it didn't concern me the same way how Scar didn't concern me. You indirectly calling me a liar and a fraud on the other hand... all on the basis of the date that I created a forum account. Please read your own posts before accusing people for reacting to... well, your own posts.
Poor guy.. There's nothing wrong about you and yet, everyone is "coming after you". Trying so hard to manipulate people here, narcissist people tend to think everyone else around them is so easy to fool. This was the comment I replied to
Yeah okay, keep trying to tell yourself that. I never even called you a liar or a fraud, now you are just making things up. You don't even fit into what I said in my original comment, which is funny, because you aren't even someone who joined in the time frame I mentioned. Way to interject yourself into something that had absolutely nothing to do with you.
Lol, now I am manipulating people. I never realized what a mastermind I was. Should I quote some of the posts you have made in other threads? If you want to call someone a jerk, perhaps you shouldn't also be one yourself?
Go ahead buddy. I'm curious.
My first reply was stating that just because people join the forums now doesn't mean they weren't a fan before.
You went on...
I said your opinion is your own despite this being a clear insult to a large demographic. I agreed with you while trying to go back to the topic at hand. I will say I shouldn't have mentioned your name directly when replying to chemical_art.
Past that, you just kept denying your own posts despite the evidence being there. I don't need to tell myself anything, there is written proof lol. I fit the demographic you called BS accounts, claiming me and others similar in my position to be liars and furthermore Russian or Chinese bots. You are accusing us of fraud by claiming we are something we are not(look up the definition if you are unsure). Now you are surprised you are being called out.
Come on man, you have called people trolls, idiots, fanboys, and been overly aggressive to quite a few people who have opposing opinions to yours. Basically anyone who defends the game or taleworlds in threads you have participated in. You can't deny this. Do you really want me to copy and paste your threads like that? How about saying things like "Masturbate to your ego" or calling people idiots or fanboys for not agreeing with you, or discounting all opinions that are opposite of yours. You have plenty of posts like this. Look how aggressive you got for my comment which wasn't even that bad.
I have nothing else to say to you. Enjoy your quarantine buddy.
So, I am to understand that it is okay to make a sarcastic remark or something similar when someone says something insulting first? Good to know that I acted appropriately when you insulted others by calling them fanboys! I hope you enjoy yours as well!
Except none of your so called evidence proved any point you were trying to make. If your point is that I was being elitist with my comment, ok that is your opinion. I admit I was wrong about The Sign of 33, but that doesn't mean I am wrong about everyone, hence the use of "Some" and "None" in the post you yourself quoted. I still stand by my comment also. Well, I am going to sleep now.
meowwoofneigh
Regular
I can feel the fire burning in this thread through my computer screen from all these people who think having old accounts with elaborate rankings = inviolable authority. I for one only needed a simple official comms thread straight from the devs on why are there delays to soothe the players worries, when to expect patch updates, what kinds of bugs and code glitches they are currently working on fixing, as well as all other forms of meta stuff.
My only problem on the game is the gradual stuttering/lag/fps drop on simulated battles and slow loading times the more I spend playing, along with that 'audio echo' that gradually shows up with it, which meant there's a problem with the game audio coding process. And, from what I read, most of the said problems are only on the sandbox/campaign scenario, while other modes don't appear to have such problems as far as I am aware.
Edit: Forgot to mention re: slow loading times, that also includes loading saves, transitioning between map mode, battle/siege mode, and menu mode (aka inventory, character profile, trading, etc.), and especially whenever I exit the game, the loading time there was disgustingly slow. All of these issues started showing some time after I updated the game to 1.1.0.
The problem was so bad I had to set the lighting, shadow and background audio effects to low, limit the framerate to 60 and the number of units fielded on battle/siege mode to a paltry number of 400, didn't help that the stutter/lag became intense whenever a set of units was loaded into the map while another retreats. It's so bad that whenever I press Alt+F4 (or Alt+Tab) my PC framerate is significantly affected just from the game running, that never even happened before, and my PC is custom built to run big games mind you.
The in-game stutter/audio overload and the memory/RAM leaks really needed urgent fixing ASAP, I'm sure many people have such problems but don't report them since they won't even bother to make accounts here due to varying degrees of spring fever.
My only problem on the game is the gradual stuttering/lag/fps drop on simulated battles and slow loading times the more I spend playing, along with that 'audio echo' that gradually shows up with it, which meant there's a problem with the game audio coding process. And, from what I read, most of the said problems are only on the sandbox/campaign scenario, while other modes don't appear to have such problems as far as I am aware.
Edit: Forgot to mention re: slow loading times, that also includes loading saves, transitioning between map mode, battle/siege mode, and menu mode (aka inventory, character profile, trading, etc.), and especially whenever I exit the game, the loading time there was disgustingly slow. All of these issues started showing some time after I updated the game to 1.1.0.
The problem was so bad I had to set the lighting, shadow and background audio effects to low, limit the framerate to 60 and the number of units fielded on battle/siege mode to a paltry number of 400, didn't help that the stutter/lag became intense whenever a set of units was loaded into the map while another retreats. It's so bad that whenever I press Alt+F4 (or Alt+Tab) my PC framerate is significantly affected just from the game running, that never even happened before, and my PC is custom built to run big games mind you.
The in-game stutter/audio overload and the memory/RAM leaks really needed urgent fixing ASAP, I'm sure many people have such problems but don't report them since they won't even bother to make accounts here due to varying degrees of spring fever.
Last edited:
Then I shall leave you this for the morning.
You made your stance clear. My point is not to make you look bad, but to make you understand how your skepticism is severely misplaced in this thread. Not only that, but your hypocrisy is also severe.
Here, enjoy:
The Start
The Reaction
He mentioned to you when?
Claiming Innocence Despite ?
Hypocrisy 2.0
Where were you to white knight when kweassa accused newbies of entitlement in a thread that asks for a reasonable demand? Are you against the idea of more organized communication? Personally, I think it beats having to search dev replies on long threads.
Anyway, if I somehow, somehow got something mixed up, let me know and I will apologize. Anyway, let me rephrase my point since I know you will ask.
I do not believe it is just to accuse people of fraudulent acts based on no evidence but your two cents. That being said, you are justified and entitled to that opinion, just try not to be so surprised when the people you call out call back.
Last edited:
Well, the only shi* we have to deal here is that every fair thread is raided by so-called "calm veterans" with their idiotic judgments about what should be discussed and what not.
Some of them could very well be BS accounts. Of course, since you generalized in your previous statement this generalization does not surprise me.
Lol okay
I call whoever out on their bull**** when they spew it. And you, sir, how spouted some. As I said, not everybody feels the need to create a forum account. Doesn't mean they haven't been fans for a while, and it doesn't mean just because they're new they aren't fans.Lol gatekeeping much? I generally do not go on forums, simply because I have no need to. I joined this one because I am actually a huge fan of Warband and Bannerlord, and have been a player of Warband since, like I said, 2013. Believe me or not, I do not care.
I don't care who has been on here for 10 ten years or who has been on here for 10 days. And yes, saying your better because you spent more time on so and so a website and other people who have spent less are "Chinese and Russian bots," yes that is absolutely elitism.
So had a long day yesterday, didn't get around to reply to some of the post comments made to mine. So here it goes!
- From the top! your reply.
- Now we might have a different understanding of the word "stakeholders" . Now @duchuy613, does explain it in the more generic and common sense of the definition, in his post. My definition of the word is also in the extended context to the project management and product development tool, named SCRUM.
- @duchuy613 original reply:
Thanks for the reply @duchuy613, +1. Though I would say the last sentence of your original post is a bit harsh. Not that I don't understand why it's in there (but just to be clear, talking about the sentence ending with "delusional".
crimsonfilms said:
Going to take these two arguments in one go, since they go hand in hand with the point I'm making.
- 1.1: I never said that, directly, though I understand that it's implied, in my original argument. But in your first post, you wrote -
- 1.2: In this post, you argue that because of the "90%" (statistics, that you have from where?), can't give concrete, valid, and constructive feedback, which is the reason why these forums don't work, isn't that argument also implying that, "good communication" , which can be translated to the above-highlighted words, is going to do exactly that? That seems a bit contradictory in my mind.
- 2: Correct, games are definitely a part of the entertainment industries, but that doesn't validate your argument, simply because the way you use it, is taking the edge-cases of the data, and then making that the defining empirical data to assert your logic. Again like your first argument (1), you simply take out the data that best suits your needs. So a thought experiment: A man has a coat and a suitcase. This man can put on his coat, so it covers his body. This man can fold his coat and put it into his suitcase. Does the man fit inside his suitcase? He should, simply because his coat can and the man can be inside his coat, but because of restrictions of physics and anatomy, that is simply not the case. My point? it simply paints an inaccurate picture of any given situation.
On that note moving on.
crimsonfilms said: - Also @JustinTime49 brings an interesting point to the table: his reply to yours (@crimsonfilms) -
- @JustinTime49, while you bring up an important point about how this forum has been used to test and fix various issues. I do disagree with the statement of forum communication isn't a deciding factor, while I agree it isn't a major deciding factor but to completely discard it, makes the rest of your point moot. So what is then, in your opinion, a deciding factor or better yet factors, in creating a successful product?
- I find it interesting that you both use this forum, with the idea that your comments and opinions aren't contributing and deciding factors that have no effect on the overall final product. Then why are you both here? Of course, that doesn't mean it will be "your vision" of the game. But it will have IMHO a positive effect on the final product, in some form or way.
Last edited:
Wow! The toxicity and rampant division in this thread and the entire community are somehow both hilarious and depressing at the same time. Clearly people are locked into two camps, kiss the game and TW's ass and say it's just so awesome and anyone who criticizes it is a myopic, entitled child, or the game royally sucks and is a piece of trash, and anyone who likes it is a "fanboy", and even if your approach is more moderate, you STILL get lashed out at. Generally, with both arguments, I see the points of them and agree with some of it, but this community has devolved into ridiculousness akin to American style right vs left politics. Come on, everyone loves M&B and is passionate about it for similar reasons, and starting a whirlwind of conflict is absurd, and others attempting to accentuate it by bringing it down to the initiator's level does not help.
Is this directed at my posts as well? Genuinely, just curious.
