sugestion all by ME

正在查看此主题的用户

fanthor

Sergeant at Arms
suggestion
now if we batle someone the only thing to do b4 the fight is leave battle, soldiers join allies and lead soldiers to war
how bout if ther are other thing like:


B4 FIGHT........

1)challenge the party leader-MAN TO MAN
  beat the pasty leader then there will be a random chance if he will respect you and offer some gifts and offer military help or be a rival that will always continue to hunt you to death.. increasing in power everytime u beat him on one on one fights

2)choose what type of soldiers to fight with(maybe have been suggested b4)
choose what army to bring like lancers and archers.... arrows from the sky and lancers in the front...... shield the arrows and die stabbed by lances or swordsmen and knights.......... knights run through and everyone cower to the sides and the swordsmen come then fight the enemy ...... the knights then reverse and just hack and slash

3)signed a peace treaty then break it
sign a peace treaty with the enemy and then when they are offguard just slaughter all of them.....will really break the relationship with the enemy and soldiers morale go down as killing people that is not the enemy is always a ?? for the soldiers.....win and suffer the consequences for being so cruel........

4)attack from the east,south and north
army divided by 3 lead by marnid.borcha and you
more to it is selfexplanatory

5)terms
in war each army commander always give terms to the enemy like join us or die, surrender, offer gold for their land and something like that

IN BATTLE.....

5)flee u stupid fools
there are retreat command but if u reatreat ur army will suffer..... how bout choosing for u to flee or ur soldiers running first then u choose to wait until all soldiers left the battle field or just left that stupid blind farmer that is running to wrong end of the field....just like a retreat then more war but most of the army already left the field, lower casualties for the soldiers but higher chances of losing as you must stay and fight


IDEAS

STR=boost morale as the stronger the commander the soldiers would discipline themselves afraid of dying not at the enemies swords but at his own commander....and the higher str we got heavy weapons and armors wont be much of a problem.....
30 STR=enemies fear us as an unbeatable man..... weapons and armors weights? whats that!!.... just being in the field make enmies lower their morale

AGI=more slashes per minute.... and........errr dunno arr.....
30 AGI=enemies hate being kill so fast........ but they like being killed without pain

INT=grew to be a cunning commander.....and whatsoever
30 INT=enemies fear us as an unbeatable commander.......losing is never in my life... except when i lose

CHA=make the most out of the men as soldiers respect you and even enemies are affected as they are guilty of killing a nice man
30 CHA= soldiers always protect you when at the brink of death....... enemy parties prisoners have a random chances to help fight the enemy

the start of the game where u choose the stats there should be a height stats like tall person,short person or just medium size person
tall person=tall people have long legs and they can move fast tahan people with short legs but armors are always on a shortage for tall person so they are fast but low defense

short person=short person are very slow unlike tall person and some armors are bigger than their body but that is an advantage as big armors cover their body more making him an a high defensieve tank so slow but high defense

moderate= moderate speed and armors are always the same size just covering some parts making a moderate defense so moderate defense and speed

for people complaining about my grammar sorry as in my country people always mix up englis and malay(thats my language) so its hard to say it clearly
 
Say I didn't bother to read your post because you didn't use correct grammar.  I wouldn't know if your ideas are good or bad.
I lurk the suggestions forums, looking for ideas to implement in my mod, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.  However, I'm not going to read that ****.
 
fanthor 说:
say what??

He said....

Sorry, but, no, these ideas have mostly been suggested before, and mostly suck.

It seems to me that most of your suggestions are more based towards a stat-based game. Nothing wrong with stat-based games, but this is not one of them, and will not likely be changed to reflect that style.

On this note, I wonder if this forum has a FPI list? FPI meaning Frequently Proposed Ideas.... It should be stickied in the suggestions forum, in hopes of preventing just such posts as these, and to prevent that subsequent flames that may result.

Frequently proposed ideas fall into the following category....

"We've heard of this, it's not going to happen, please don't post about it."

EDIT: I see it does. It also seems to have not one, but two. Fanthor, I recommend you read them both.
 
I noticed that right off the bat. But for some reason, I thought the Privy Council had posting restrictions to prevent exactly this sort of thread.
 
Well, the ones that are not stat based are not too bad actually if you ask me (such as more options regarding HOW you want to retreat and what troops you wish to you with you in battle) and I would in-fact agree whole-heartedly with both of those - especially the later - seeing as how at the moment it's pointless having a mixed party since the game would randomly decide who would go onto the battlefield. However all of this has been discussed, and can be easily located.

However regarding the STR / AGI or whatever - how would the enemy know what "your" stats are? And for example if you had an enemy peasant with 40STR, how would YOU know that he has 40 STR?

As for a few others... I just didn't understand half of them so I would rather not make any false mis-interpretations..

Welcome to the forums ::smile:
 
Maeglin Dubh 说:
fanthor 说:
say what??

He said....

Sorry, but, no, these ideas have mostly been suggested before, and mostly suck.

It seems to me that most of your suggestions are more based towards a stat-based game. Nothing wrong with stat-based games, but this is not one of them, and will not likely be changed to reflect that style.

On this note, I wonder if this forum has a FPI list? FPI meaning Frequently Proposed Ideas.... It should be stickied in the suggestions forum, in hopes of preventing just such posts as these, and to prevent that subsequent flames that may result.

Frequently proposed ideas fall into the following category....

"We've heard of this, it's not going to happen, please don't post about it."

EDIT: I see it does. It also seems to have not one, but two. Fanthor, I recommend you read them both.



i dunno if those are based on stat base game or not but choosing it leads to you doing it so its maybe a stat based game combined with the real thing

Volkier 说:
However regarding the STR / AGI or whatever - how would the enemy know what "your" stats are? And for example if you had an enemy peasant with 40STR, how would YOU know that he has 40 STR?

As for a few others... I just didn't understand half of them so I would rather not make any false mis-interpretations..

Welcome to the forums ::smile:

its not like enemies know it but just like a bonus and err err now that i think of it that seems useless

and what did u dont understand tell me i can explain it more detailed

and thx 

why did every post of mine always end up being in the negative sides of all of you guys
 
fanthor 说:
why did every post of mine always end up being in the negative sides of all of you guys
-No capitalization.
-No punctuation, except in needless multiples.
-Sentence fragments.
-Rambling run-on sentences.
-Random line breaks which make the flow of ideas staccatto and syncopated.
-Incoherent and jarring topic shifts which are hard to follow.

In short, the amount of difficulty required simply to decipher your posts, and the lack of consideration on your part that such terrible posting habits display, puts people in a bad mood and they become curt, rude, and disinclined to consider any actual merit that may be hidden in your posts.  Just like typing in all caps gives the impression of yelling, typing without punctuation or capitalization gives the impression of talking to a hyperactive, caffeinated squirrel;  it's frustrating, annoying, and it brings out the worst in people:  especially on the internet.

It's almost as annoying as using a colon and semi-colon in one sentence.
 
This thread made me laugh so hard I had to save it to a word document and email it to someone.

Also, I wholeheartedly agree with Arab.
 
Well... Your grammar and posts are quite bad... but don't worry - bad as in bad to the extent of being amusing (like Cajesar said), and NOT to the extent of being beyond help or hope (like a few other members prior to you).

Infact, I think that it's more of a "welcome aboard beating" (like the ones you get in the army when you get posted to another unit) rather than a blanket party - so you should actually be happy ::grin:

But at the same time, do try and spend more time and effort writing your posts, and make them look less like an sms message.. That way, you would seem a lot more serious to the readers.. Just my advice ::smile:
 
Eogan 说:
Just like typing in all caps gives the impression of yelling, typing without punctuation or capitalization gives the impression of talking to a hyperactive, caffeinated squirrel;  it's frustrating, annoying, and it brings out the worst in people:  especially on the internet.

It's almost as annoying as using a colon and semi-colon in one sentence.
Wow, that does piss me off.  Perhaps, though, you should've used a hyphen instead of the colon?

@  Volkier--Nope, it isn't like I'm "welcoming" this douche.  I just hate when people expect the respect it takes to read and consider their ideas, when they don't give the reader respect in making a legible post.
 
At least he sounds better than he does here...



I'm not saying he is right or anything - just that some other people would be whining and crying right about now while he still jokes about it ::\
 
Stonewall382 说:
Eogan 说:
Just like typing in all caps gives the impression of yelling, typing without punctuation or capitalization gives the impression of talking to a hyperactive, caffeinated squirrel;  it's frustrating, annoying, and it brings out the worst in people:  especially on the internet.

It's almost as annoying as using a colon and semi-colon in one sentence.
Wow, that does piss me off.  Perhaps, though, you should've used a hyphen instead of the colon?
Ack!  Don't get me started on the whole use-a-hyphen-where-a-colon-should-be-because-you're-not-comfortable-enough-with-colon-usage trend!  Hyphens join words together and frame asides when your parenthese keys are broken:  joining sentences is the job of the two colons and conjunctions.  I will accept that the sentence in question could have had a comma rather than a colon, but I'm firmly against infecting my writing with Hyphoid.

And also, vern de hern de goonde.
 
After skipping the first post and reading all the responses complaining about the writing style, i challenged myself to go back and decypher what he said.

The thing is though, there was no need. The ideas themselves were rubbish.
 
Eogan 说:
Stonewall382 说:
Eogan 说:
Just like typing in all caps gives the impression of yelling, typing without punctuation or capitalization gives the impression of talking to a hyperactive, caffeinated squirrel;  it's frustrating, annoying, and it brings out the worst in people:  especially on the internet.

It's almost as annoying as using a colon and semi-colon in one sentence.
Wow, that does piss me off.  Perhaps, though, you should've used a hyphen instead of the colon?
Ack!  Don't get me started on the whole use-a-hyphen-where-a-colon-should-be-because-you're-not-comfortable-enough-with-colon-usage trend!  Hyphens join words together and frame asides when your parenthese keys are broken:  joining sentences is the job of the two colons and conjunctions.  I will accept that the sentence in question could have had a comma rather than a colon, but I'm firmly against infecting my writing with Hyphoid.

And also, vern de hern de goonde.

I disagree.  Hyphens are there to make someone aware of an attribute of the subject (not grammarily/literally speaking, I just mean whatever you're talking about) they might not otherwise consider.  Colons are used to further explain what you've already said:
Something on the order of 9600 members of the taleworlds.com forum--over 99%--are male.
A parentheses there would be too passive, and would just get passed over, because the fragment is so small.  Hyphens (double hyphens, at that) are needed.

And yes, a comma probably would've been best. :razz:

@  Ingo--Thanks for doing the community service.  Someone had to do it.:wink:
 
I'd say that they're mediocre ideas (and I hold no ill will or scorn to Fanthor), except for the 3-pronged attack idea. Maybe just 2 prongs, or an option for 1, 2, or 3.
And for the grammar, it wasn't really that hard to read, and he did say that Malaysian (I think) was his native language.
 
Hyphens:

a) To show an afterthought (eg, "He said -and I hope he's right- that these samples are free")
b) To link words togther (eg, over-friendly)

Colons:

a) To start a list of short sentences
(eg, "I stopped him from joining because:
-He was too confident
-He doesn't take any interst in the subject)

b) To link sentences (eg, "I'm allowing you to borrow this: as long as you bring it back next week")


Quoted from some piece of year 6 work I found in my room when cleaning (:shock:) it yesterday
 
后退
顶部 底部