From the encyclopedia thing in-game...
Why does the land where the fur trade is supposed to be the source of their wealth have no fur? Why is this the case in Battania and not Sturgia? How are people in Sturgia keeping warm without furs especially considering there's snow all year round in Sturgia (which btw isn't the case in the real world anywhere south of the arctic circle)?
I feel like it would make a great deal of sense, even if you just took the fur models from Battania and added 'northern bear... northern wolf... etc" to it that would be fine.
"The Sturgian forests are forbidding and cold, but great wealth lies within. Wild honey can be found, and bog iron, but the real prize has always been fur. For centuries, brave traders ventured there to buy the pelts of fox, rabbit and ermine from the tribes of the woods. As the empire expanded eastward, that trickle of traders became a flood. Great towns sprung up on the rivers. Fortune-seekers came from the coast, from the steppes, and most of all from the Nordlands. Tribal elders made alliances with the newcomers, sealed by wedding vows, and with their share of the trading profits hired mercenaries to subdue other tribes. Sturgia became a collection of principalities, then a kingdom, the great powerhouse of the north."
Why does the land where the fur trade is supposed to be the source of their wealth have no fur? Why is this the case in Battania and not Sturgia? How are people in Sturgia keeping warm without furs especially considering there's snow all year round in Sturgia (which btw isn't the case in the real world anywhere south of the arctic circle)?
I feel like it would make a great deal of sense, even if you just took the fur models from Battania and added 'northern bear... northern wolf... etc" to it that would be fine.