Some criticisms

正在查看此主题的用户

Huge blood effusion are very nicely done, but unfortunately too frequent. In some videos, they occur even when the player barely cuddle an armored ennemy with the point of his lance. It's simply unrealistic.

This is entirely for gameplay reasons, as stated from Callum. Blood is a visual identifier for the player to see if their hits landed on the enemy. Removing this would make the game feel weird, like playing Call od Duty without hitmarkers.

This is another case of fun vs realism, and thank god Taleworlds is going the correct route.

Fun>Realism

Man, I changed alot...
 
Sounds, animations and screams can do that too. There is really no reason to go in such unrealistic things as the situation I described.
And I don't find it funny nor satisfying. You barely touch a full armored guy and he reacts as if you smashed a naked peasant. No challenge.

Btw the most fun and satisfying thing in Warband was to hit someone with a ranged weapon from a long distance. There was no blood, just great animations and sounds.
 
You can already do this in Warband. You still see people in multiplayer reliably killing fully armored knights with greatswords in just 3 hits. Remove that element and the game stops turning from a skillbased medieval combat game to a stat grinding rpg where stats matter more than skill.

If you prefer the combat like it is in Warband than this should not effect you at all in actual gameplay.


 
I didn't refer to the killing of such armored warrior, but only to the harming, with the animations and effets that go along. I find it already rewarding.
 
DanAngleland 说:
Ugly armours and too much armour: Most of the armours look ok to me, some I really like, but I dislike the bulkiness of some troops and over abundance of metal even on mid tier troops. If Calradia at this time broadly reflects dark ages and a bit later, then I would like to see fewer troops with metal armours (though I hate leather and studded stuff; just give them normal clothes, maybe some with furs, and have majority cope with shield and helmet for protection) and fewer barded horses. That's not to say the horse bards don't generally look nice, they do, but I feel a bit like they shouldn't be so prevalent; each faction seems to have them for their high tier cav. It's especially strange to see such horses getting so easily hacked down. I could be wrong about my impression that there wouldn't be so many well armoured troops in this era. On further thought I may also be getting a skewed impression of the number of armoured troops by the Captain Mode vids, when I suppose the troops might not be quite the same as in the main game.

The ugly armours though are ones such as the Battanian axemen one with the chunky small breastplate; he already wears a scale vest (with mail visible on the upper arms), but apparently needs this small and overly decorated breastplate which is secured by a harness with chunky leather and metal shoulder pads. I don't like the colour of the metal on this troop either, it makes it look rather flat (I think it's a realistic finish to the metal, I've seen metal weapons and armour like that, but I just don't find it appealing). I think it is a sort of matte polish. In contrast most of the scale armours of the Empire look gorgeous.

I agree so much with this.
The armor resembles something more akin to a what you would see at a cosplay convention or at a LARP fest, rather than what you would actually see in the early middle-ages.

And over-exaggerated amount of furs that provide no protection and would only serve to encumber and overheat the wearer.
STUDDED LEATHER!!!
Bulky stuff that only makes the wearer look big.
Forearm gauntlets.

For example:
WTF is this? V
Zj2fvvv.jpg



 
I don't know about you guys, but seems very legit to me if a horse dies when hit by a 2handed axe. It's a huge blade, and the horse speed adds to the colision's damage. There's no way for a horse to being able to carry an armoured man in it's back when there's a 8cm deep/ 22cm widht cut in it's chest.
 
BayBear 说:
Enigmaaa 说:
For example:
WTF is this? V
Zj2fvvv.jpg
It’s important to remember that Bannerlord is considered low-fantasy.

Fantasy doesnt change the fundamentals of armor. At least not when the armor is supposed to be worn by humans. I would give them a pass if it was an orc wearing that armor, but it is a human and therefore his armor should resemble something that would be comfortable for a human to wear. Warband has quite good armor, so there is no reason why bannerlord shouldn’t.
 
I think sword holding is fine, holding a double handed sword in center of your body is not ideal for swinging unless you keep it at above like in kingdom of heaven movie.
 
I dont like how Aserai curved swords have yalman.
Yalman was only a case for 14-15-16th century and later on Ottoman Swords.
If they are going to give Aserai curved swords they should at least do them without yalman since Arabs never had those swords.
 
Where do you see the videos of the Aserai carrying overlycurved schimitars? I only see them using the nomad sabre, which looks very tame and not that curved at all.


image.png
 
Enigmaaa 说:
For example:
WTF is this? V
Zj2fvvv.jpg

Wow, I've never seen that one before. And damn is it ugly. Patches of scales on misshapen slabs of leather with bits of fur underneath, bizzare angled pauldrons, a comical tiny chestplate in the middle, and belts wrapped around the whole thing. It's like a parody of bad armour tropes, or a prop from a cheap 80s fantasy film.

It's just a few steps above this kind of thing:

QnYHevb.png
83f67331179ef961e08a91960d1a59cd.jpg

Edit: He's wearing a chainmail shirt. A SHIRT. About 10cm of it is exposed. Why would he wear that when it might only offer him a few square inches of protection? :lol: :lol:
 
Rainbow Dash 说:
Enigmaaa 说:
For example:
WTF is this? V
Zj2fvvv.jpg
I think it looks fine and you're just nitpicking

Anyone who’s seen two Lindybeige videos would know that that armor is more akin to fantasy than reality.
And yes i am nitpicking a bit, it really doesnt affect gameplay, but why come up with some fantasy armor when the real deal looks better?
 
really doesnt affect gameplay

Exactly. Its armor, it has protection, and it's doing its job. We have more important issues to worry about than history nerds complaining about how this armor is not realistic to medieval times.

but why come up with some fantasy armor when the real deal looks better?

Roleplaying. Some people want to roleplay as a naked barbarian and that is fine.

Besides, the modding support is there so if you really want your historically realistic armors you can just mod it in.
 
Mount & Blade was a realistic medieval game, although taking place in a fictionnal world. And that is one of the reasons of its success. But such fantasy crap undermines this aspect of the game. So the issue is important.
 
Looks fine to me, to be honest. The armour is decent and it doesn't look too out of place for the series, M&B has never been a 'realistic' game, more like very low fantasy but surely not realistic. This is kinda trivial. Running out of stuff to talk about?
 
Gab-AG. 说:
Looks fine to me, to be honest. The armour is decent and it doesn't look too out of place for the series, M&B has never been a 'realistic' game, more like very low fantasy but surely not realistic. This is kinda trivial. Running out of stuff to talk about?

+1

What happened to actual issues we had like Skirmish mode in multiplayer? Where is the outrage for that?
 
后退
顶部 底部