The sieges are 100x times better than in Warband however i noticed things that could be improve.
Two things that should be really improve:
-Archers defenders make a very bad use (to be polite) of the of walls merlons, they are standing in middle of the intervals like really stupid soldiers and being an easy target. The best way of using merlons is to stand behind and shot at ennemy by side...
As an exemple, on the tower you should have at least four archers standing behind merlons in place of two standing stupidly in intervals.
-It seems that the sieges towers necessarly need to use a merlon destructed wall part. Siege towers are designed to adapt to normal walls. The bridge part just fall on the merlons and attackers are coming from upper which is even better that coming at the same level of the ennemy. So this idea of using siege tower only on destructed walls part is really weird and even tactically not really good. Why not just use normal walls ?
Others nice pictures exemples:
Other little things:
About the siege towers, i think i have seen 4 guys pushing one oh my god they must be really strong ones
Ballista guys could deserve a little bit more protection on their sides, wood fence or shields ? But like that you're just screaming "hello i'm the target" !
Infantry is defending the walls far from the border of the wall, quite weird, noticed that in 2016 video !? I have to verify this with others 2019 videos.
Edit: after watching other videos this is crazy where is infantry on the walls ? There is only archers Its like defenders have very little armies in every sieges ?
Two things that should be really improve:
-Archers defenders make a very bad use (to be polite) of the of walls merlons, they are standing in middle of the intervals like really stupid soldiers and being an easy target. The best way of using merlons is to stand behind and shot at ennemy by side...
As an exemple, on the tower you should have at least four archers standing behind merlons in place of two standing stupidly in intervals.
-It seems that the sieges towers necessarly need to use a merlon destructed wall part. Siege towers are designed to adapt to normal walls. The bridge part just fall on the merlons and attackers are coming from upper which is even better that coming at the same level of the ennemy. So this idea of using siege tower only on destructed walls part is really weird and even tactically not really good. Why not just use normal walls ?
Others nice pictures exemples:
Other little things:
About the siege towers, i think i have seen 4 guys pushing one oh my god they must be really strong ones
Ballista guys could deserve a little bit more protection on their sides, wood fence or shields ? But like that you're just screaming "hello i'm the target" !
Infantry is defending the walls far from the border of the wall, quite weird, noticed that in 2016 video !? I have to verify this with others 2019 videos.
Edit: after watching other videos this is crazy where is infantry on the walls ? There is only archers Its like defenders have very little armies in every sieges ?