Sieges are now 30v30

[lockefeer]

Why? 50v50 was good, 30v30 feels too empty.
Edit: probably because of the lack of players in EU servers.

 

[Caps]

because of the server crashes most likely

 

[Caius_III]

30 v 30 really ? lmao

 

[E.M.Baguette]

50vs50 is still here. Some servers are 30vs30 others are 50vs50. It has been that way in the past few weeks, if it hasn't changed today.

 

[Caps]

50vs50 is still here. Some servers are 30vs30 others are 50vs50. It has been that way in the past few weeks, if it hasn't changed today.

already wondered cuz i wanted to check and it was still 50v50

 

[Sirwalterhorstsock]

Well on weekday we don’t even have enough players to fill a siege on NA fun stuff here stuck at 45 searching forever and then went down when people gave up and this was prime time like 730 - to 9

 

[E.M.Baguette]

I am playing right now in a siege server, where at the beggining it was 30vs30 and in 5min it changed to 50vs50. Same battle.

 

[lockefeer]

Today I played some that were 30v30 the entire time.

 

[Caps]

maybe it changes dynamic and depends how many people are in queue at the moment

 

[hoe12moe]

maybe it changes dynamic and depends how many people are in queue at the moment

I think so, 30v30 is quite common late at night.

 

[RubbingMyAxe]

Well on weekday we don’t even have enough players to fill a siege on NA fun stuff here stuck at 45 searching forever and then went down when people gave up and this was prime time like 730 - to 9

Yep, maybe siege would actually get some players if it was a custom server that people could join from the server list instead of a perpetual queue.

 

[Gianni Tsunami]

I've noticed a big increase in 30v30 ever since most of the siege games crashed during that community event.

 

[Styo]

I still can't get into a Siege match... Waited for 30 minutes today...

 

[Shiroin]

Edit: probably because of the lack of players in EU servers.

Please note that Siege game mode requires a minimum of 60 players.

Indeed. I think most of the players cannot wait for matchmaking a siege game above tens of minutes. Matchmaking a 30v30 siege game is much faster though it is still slow.

 

[Jesse | Oasis-Hosting.net]

Indeed. I think most of the players cannot wait for matchmaking a siege game above tens of minutes. Matchmaking a 30v30 siege game is much faster though it is still slow.

Match making was just a mistake entirely. Who thought this was a good idea over being able to choose your own server and play on it without waiting.

 

[firion66]

Match making was just a mistake entirely. Who thought this was a good idea over being able to choose your own server and play on it without waiting.

I think it could be good if they did it in TF2 fashion: you have server list and matchmaking. Matchmaking servers work like normal servers so anybody can disconnect and connect in any time to non-full one. You may say it's no different than just server list, and it's not, except as a casual player you don't have to look through it.

I think it's much more efficient than waiting for 30-50 people everytime you want to play and it doesn't spoil server list for people who just want to spend some time in known comunities.

Sometimes I wonder if TW developers play other games than their own and League of Legends.

 

[Jesse | Oasis-Hosting.net]

I think it could be good if they did it in TF2 fashion: you have server list and matchmaking. Matchmaking servers work like normal servers so anybody can disconnect and connect in any time to non-full one. You may say it's no different than just server list, and it's not, except as a casual player you don't have to look through it.

I think it's much more efficient than waiting for 30-50 people everytime you want to play and it doesn't spoil server list for people who just want to spend some time in known comunities.

Sometimes I wonder if TW developers play other games than their own and League of Legends.

From the looks of things, probably not.