Berzerker Jay
I really would be happy to clarify anything, and I have given plenty of examples around all the arguments I've made here -- this is just going on ad nauseum with a certain individual who has basically responded with this reactivity to probably every point I've made here, just because they don't like to be contradicted, I suppose.As a third party to all this, why is a post lamenting emotion starting by accusing someone of being emotional? I do not bring it up to project attributes to you, but only to state contrasted to vonbalt's post of:
which I feel is a very detailed explanation using figures to illustrate a point, yours just leaves me confused.
I genuinely want to understand your point. However the only way i can do so is if you illustrate your point with examples.
The formula and explanation is there for all to see. The ad nauseum arguments beside the point are as confusing for me -- seemingly pointless, except for that someone feels emotionally reactive to my points. It has yet to be made clear what more I need to say about the armour rating, and how substantial an armour rating getting up or over 70 happens to be. For the purpose of my points, I thought I said enough and still wait for a specific request about them.
If you have specific requests, I invite them, but as this has gotten unreasonably emotional with that other individual, I don't think it's of value to anyone to delve deeper with open-ended requests for more ad nauseum discussion. Hope you can understand that -- I'm happy to respond to anything specific as best as I'm able.
It's been weeks of unreasonable and disrespectful communication with that Ananda person, anyway, so keep that context in mind.
Last edited: