James Bond. If you strip both of them of all Figments of imagination, james bond will just be a silly actor with a gun. Darth vader will just be a silly actor without a gun. Need I say more?
James Bond. If you strip both of them of all Figments of imagination, james bond will just be a silly actor with a gun. Darth vader will just be a silly actor without a gun. Need I say more?
I believe the maximum amount of time before a topic can be resurrected is 3 days after it is buried below the first page . Regardless, Vader still wins this eternal struggle against the STD laden Bond.
I think James Bond is blessed with such unbelievable luck that he could win against Darth Vader. Even the somewhat frail Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan versions could prevail
Yeah, but Vader has the FORCE. Which is like, everything. On white bread.
"Um, I've-I've got a taser! AHHHHH-(zw00sh)"
"You have been owned, weakling." Darth Vader uses the Force to piss on his corpse.
Bond luck is stronger than any force. Vader never uses a blaster which gives Bond just enough time to use his cigarette or pocket pen cyanide darts even if Bond is being Force strangled he has withstood worse torture than that . Vader doesn't wear real armor on his arms or legs he just has that helmet and iron lung. After Vader dies from the poison dart Bond says "Breathtaking."
Well in reality anyone could beat vader with a simple handgun , you just walk up and go "BANG" , shoot him in the head and he's dead...
The difference being that whilst vader can block those gay starwars gun energy bullet thing's , he cant obviously dodge something moving faster then sound.
And if he used the force to take his gun out of his hand then bond would just pull out one of his 900 backup gun's , or some random gun would fall down from a crack in the roof out of nowhere to his convenience.