Scimitars

正在查看此主题的用户

状态
不接受进一步回复。
I opened this topic because we were really occupying a lot of place in the dev blog and devs really dont like that.

Alright first of all let me share you the history of the scimitar.

Scimitar is an umbrella term it appeared in the 16th century England in order to define all the curved swords of middle east and india.These are the ''scimitar types'' based on nations:

Shamshir (Iran)
Saif(Arabian Peninsula)
Kilij (Turkey and Egypt)
Nimcha (Morocco)
Pulwar (Afghanistan)
Talwar (Indian Subcontinent)

Shamshir: Early swords of the Persians were straight double edged swords.In the 11th century Seljuq Turks who were from Central Asia invaded Iran and they introduced their kilij to Persians.In the 12th century Persians took inspiration from it and crafted their own curved sword and called it Shamshir which basically means ''sword'' in Persian.

Saif:Now like Persians, early Arabic swords were also straight and double edged.They had 3 kinds of swords.Saif, Takoba, Kaskara.As they adopted curved swords they also called it Saif.
Sword of Umar(orginal Saif):
195px-Sword_of_Umar_ibn_al-Khittab-mohammad_adil_rais.JPG
Takoba:
ph-0.jpg
Kaskara:
kaskar2o.jpg

How did they adopted curved swords ? They learnt it from their Ghilmans.Ghilmans were slave-soldiers.Ghilman were introduced to the Abbasid Caliphate during the reign of al-Mu'tasim (r. 833–842), who showed them great favor and relied upon them for his personal guard. The ghilman were slave-soldiers taken as prisoners of war from conquered regions or frontier zones, especially from among the Turkic people of Central Asia and the Caucasian peoples (Turkish: Kölemen).They learnt it from their Turkic slave-soldiers.

Nimcha:Morrocon swords as late as 18th century I am not even explaining it.They took it from the Ottoman Empire or the Arabs.

Pulwar:The pulwar or pulouar is a single-handed curved sword originating in Afghanistan. It is the traditional sword of the Pashtun people.
It only dates back to the early 19th century.

Talwar:The talwar originated alongside other curved swords such as the Persian shamshir, the Turkish kilij and the Afghan pulwar, all such swords being originally derived from earlier curved swords developed in Turkic Central Asia.[3] The talwar typically does not have as radical a curve as the shamshir and only a very small minority have the expanded, stepped, yelman typical of the kilij.[4][5]-wiki

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now I want to talk about kilij.
Some say kilij derived from Turko-Mongol sabre while only calling Ottoman and Mameluke ones kilij while some call both of them kilij.
Doesnt matter.I am going to call both of them kilij in order to prevent any confusions.

The Central Asian Turks and their offshoots begun using curved cavalry swords beginning from the late Hsiung-Nu period.[3] The earliest examples of curved, single edged Turkish swords can be found associated with the late Hsiung-nu and Kok Turk empires.[4] These swords were made of pattern welded high carbon crucible steel, generally with long slightly curved blades with one sharp edge. A sharp back edge on the distal third of the blade known as "yalman" or "yelman" was introduced during this period.

Kilij is the first known saber in history or at least the earliest known direct predecessor of the sabers.Because the steppe people were advanced in mounted warfare they felt need of these.
Though single-edged cutting swords existed in Ancient and Early Medieval Europe, such as the Greek makhaira and the Germanic seax, the direct predecessor of the sabre appears in the context of the Eurasian steppes in the medieval period, connected to the Magyars and the Turkic expansion.[4] These oldest sabres had a slight curve, short, down-turned quillons, the grip facing the opposite direction to the blade and a sharp point with the top third of the reverse edge sharpened.[5]

attachment.php


In wiki you will mostly find Ottoman kilij which evolved a lot over years compared to the mongolian example above this.It also became more curved and thicker in order to be more effective against European armor.

ph-0.jpg


Now for the Aserai things are complicated.
I know that I demanded Aserai NOT to have any curved swords but my idea changed simply because I read their blog again and saw that there will be a minor faction based on Ghilams.
Remembered the Ghilams ? Yes they were the ones who introduced curved swords to Abbasid Caliphate.

Now the contradictory is that TW says they were inspired by before Islam Arabs instead of caliphates but they also add a minor faction based on Ghilam system which was introduced in 9th century to Abbasid Caliphate.
So long story short it is a soup of overall Arab history therefore I dont see a problem with this anymore.

 
Who cares, a sword is still a sword, its not some great technological advancement and its something people associate with arab culter. This will set them apart from the western factions too.

I’m disappointed this is even a discussion and for god’s sake, quit nit picking.

It would also be nice if the pseudo-intellectuals on this forum stopped seeking validation and realize nobody cares.
 
That was some good info.  Personally I didn't mind "scimitar" like swords because I associate their use with eastern countries more than I do straight swords
 
The curved sword or "scimitar" was widespread throughout the Middle East from at least the Ottoman period, with early examples dating to Abbasid era (9th century) Khurasan.[2][verification needed]

KhergitLancer80, this is the first line on the wikipedia page for "Scimitar".  If you can verify that it's not true, you can alter the page with better information.

I personally can't see how it took so long for a bar of iron pounded on one side instead of two to take on, particularly since, during the bronze age the curved khopesh was developed in Egypt and the Levant far earlier than straight swords.

EDIT:  on a little more searching there are a lot of blogs and mercantile websites repeating that the earliest curved steel swords were in the 9th century in Khurasan, but I don't see anything that points to the evidence or when it was found or by who.  Maybe, you can be the guy that sets the record straight?
 
How do you explain the fact that a few of Muhammad's swords are curved? That pre-dates everything you mentioned.

I don't know what's the deal with the Aserai having these swords, it's a natural choice, nothing wrong with it.

And then some people want to explain things thinking history is a simple equation formula...just like the sword on the back discussions. Different cultures trading and warring each other,individual preferences... it's obvious they would learn from each other, and secondly, curved sword designs were developed all over the world, within cultures that didn't contact each other.
Just like kids playing tag.

EDIT: Why the fuss now? We saw the Aserai videos with scimitars months ago.
 
In Tools of War: History of Weapons in Ancient Times By Syed Ramsey published in 2016 I see what appears to be the origin of this much repeated statement.
 
Iberian Wolf 说:
How do you explain the fact that a few of Muhammad's swords are curved? That pre-dates everything you mentioned.

I don't know what's the deal with the Aserai having these swords, it's a natural choice, nothing wrong with it.

And then some people want to explain things thinking history is a simple equation formula...just like the sword on the back discussions. Different cultures trading and warring each other,individual preferences... it's obvious they would learn from each other, and secondly, curved sword designs were developed all over the world, within cultures that didn't contact each other.
Just like kids playing tag.

1-If you are referring to the holy relics most of them are probably fake.
The holy relics that are prooved to be fake ;
the stone that was claimed to be Muhammads tayammun stone turned out to be an ancient assyrian tablet.It is in fact a letter that was sent to King Ashurbanipal by the head fancy of the palace.It turned out to be that the writings were orders to a sculptor called marishtar.
2-prayer rug claimed to be Fatma's turned out to be left from 16th century.
3-Another rug that was claimed to be of Huseyins turned out to be a carpet from 17th century.
4-The book that was claimed to be covered with blood of Uthman turned out to be just a moistened gazelle pelt and the writings were left from Ayyubids.
5-A pack that was claimed to be Aısha's turned out to be from the era of Suleiman The Magnificent.In fact they even found the signature of its maker.
6-The sandals that were claimed to be Mohammads turned out to be Byzantine 13th century sandals by the art historians
They were even going to make a carbon test to them but religious people called it immoral. And not few of them only one of nine of them is curved and it is obviously fake not because it is curved but because it has a yalman(fake tip).It is impossible for a sword that was produced in 7th century Arabia to have yalman.Anyways the swords are

Al adb:
BqLjQweCEAAHgvP.png
Al Ma' thur :
162f6fff-7c51-456a-8715-1235f0d4f73f.jpg
Al Rasub:
4.jpg
Al Battar:
the-sword-of-the-prophets-al-battar.jpg
Haft:
Prophet-swords_hatf1.jpg
Qal'i:
7.jpg
Zülfiqar:It is lost.Probably a mythological sword anyways.
Al Mikhdham:
pedang+7.png
Al Qadib:
8-al-qadib.jpg

KhergitLancer80 说:
So long story short it is a soup of overall Arab history therefore I dont see a problem with this anymore.
2-Well I said that it is fine if you read my entry again. I changed my mind.

''curved sword designs were developed all over the world, within cultures that didn't contact each other.''
3-Yes but not in pre islamic Arab period. Also no, sabre was limited with central asia at that time period.

4-

    ''EDIT: Why the fuss now? We saw the Aserai videos with scimitars months ago.''

They didnt say they were influenced by pre-islam period Arabs. But the thing is they also say one of the minor factions is Ghulams even though historical Ghulams were introduced in Abbasid period 9th century.So after reading that I understood that they kind of made a overall soup of Arabian history therefore it is fine.

+Kortze26
Good thing you solved your question yourself.
Also thank you for providing me a source for my claims lol.
By the way this is khopesh:
egyptian-khopesh-sword.jpg
It is basically a metallic sickle nothing else  :lol: :lol: :lol:
+Crowcorrector
Well I also dont mind it anymore.Like all the other factions they are mixing some stuff related to their culture.

+Dest45

''It is not some great technological advancement and its something people associate with arab culter.''
argumentum ad populum.
Hollywood effect, orientalism, saracen sword

''It would also be nice if the pseudo-intellectuals on this forum stopped seeking validation and realize nobody cares.''
I dont consider myself an intellectual but this topic makes me interested and I just shared some info while trying to prevent the main blog discussion distracted. Plus, your attitude is kind of offensive.

''Who cares, a sword is still a sword, its not some great technological advancement and its something people associate with arab culter. This will set them apart from the western factions too.''

Arabic straight swords are also very unique and if you dont care why did you come here ?
 
Dest45 说:
Who cares, a sword is still a sword, its not some great technological advancement and its something people associate with arab culter.

Curved swords actually did have a fair amount of technical advancement, in particular they required something called Differential Hardening to function properly, which called for heat treating only the cutting edge during the hardening process to keep the back of the blade ductile, otherwise the whole thing would snap when striking a hard object.  Also, forging from a flat bar instead of a round steel dowel meant that the handle could be held on with pins through the side instead of peened or screwed on with a pommel.  That meant production time and material cost were reduced dramatically.


It is basically a metallic sickle nothing else

Except that the cutting edge is on the oposite side from a sickle and the cutting action resembled an axe more closely.
 
Varrak 说:
Dest45 说:
It would also be nice if the pseudo-intellectuals on this forum stopped seeking validation and realize nobody cares.

Instead of appreciating some information, doing cheap things like mocking or insulting are definitely hurting the forums more.
I guess I will never understand some people, not that I would like to understand this retrogressive mindset.
 
Eh, I'm not really bothered as long as said curved swords don't dominate Aserai roster. And that's mainly because, as KhergitLancer80's photos show, Arabic straight swords are work of art and there's something enticing in their overall shape, while at the same time they're appropriate for the setting.
 
KhergitLancer80 说:
Instead of appreciating some information, doing cheap things like mocking or insulting are definitely hurting the forums more.

Eh, where did he insult you? You can of course go and share your pseudo-intellectual historical knowledge in History thread. This is the forum section for the game called Bannerlord, which is being made by TW as they wish.

Nobody cares "historical-accuracy" or realism freaks since Callum openly said that they do not copy/paste from history. "taking inspiration from history" does not equal with "copy/paste". Bannerlord is being made in one imaginary Calradia continent with made-up factions.

There will be historical mods for sure, you are more than welcome to make your own mod as well.

Summary: Nobody cares.
 
Again, The Mount and Blade series is fictional.They use inspiration based throughout the medieval period. Saying you think this should or should not be in because it wasn't used at that period of time is invalid. They cater to many time frames of the age , which in my opinion is brilliant because we all get a slice of what we want.

If my Battanian celt wants a curved sword, I'll ride off to get one. Road trip !  :party:
 
Varrak 说:
KhergitLancer80 说:
Instead of appreciating some information, doing cheap things like mocking or insulting are definitely hurting the forums more.

Eh, where did he insult you? You can of course go and share your pseudo-intellectual historical knowledge in History thread. This is the forum section for the game called Bannerlord, which is being made by TW as they wish.

Nobody cares "historical-accuracy" or realism freaks since Callum openly said that they do not copy/paste from history. "taking inspiration from history" does not equal with "copy/paste". Bannerlord is being made in one imaginary Calradia continent with made-up factions.

There will be historical mods for sure, you are more than welcome to make your own mod as well.

Summary: Nobody cares.

Your attitude is very rude and you are in a lot of fallacies. Same with Dest45 and FBohler.
The only reason I opened this topic was to continue the arguement that started in Devblog. Because devs dont like dev forum to be occupied a lot with one thing.

And I just wrote everything I knew at the start in order to end the wrong claims about history.Because some people didnt acknowledge some stuff.
Not because I want game to obey it 100%.

If you read the last sentence of my first entry you will see that I am fine with scimitars.

And people do care since it wasnt me who demanded it first not to exist in Aserai if you check the dev forum.
 
Look, we do not care how emotional you are. We just do not care. If your emotions hurted so much when we say " this game is not copying history as it is, but taking inspiration and then being shaped however TW wants", then this is what should be told to you;

https://youtu.be/e8chEy9rwL4?t=124

You love realism or historical accuracy? Cool. Go and make your own mod.
 
Varrak 说:
Look, we do not care how emotional you are. We just do not care. If your emotions hurted so much when we say " this game is not copying history as it is, but taking inspiration and then being shaped however TW wants", then this is what should be told to you;

https://youtu.be/e8chEy9rwL4?t=124

You love realism or historical accuracy? Cool. Go and make your own mod.

What emotions ?
What the hell are you talking about  ?
I have already stated that I dont care about scimitars anymore.
In fact I have been stating this since my first entry !
It confirms that you never read any of them properly.

And I am not hurted or anything why would I be ?

Also sharing that video shows that you are as immature as a child.

You are mad. Only mads argue with mad people, not me.
 
KhergitLancer80 说:
What emotions ?

You claimed Dest45 to "insulted" you (he didn't, he just wrote a fact)

Then you wrote that FBohler and me were so rude, while we just stated facts.

You can't deal with facts and feel sad is nothing to do with us, but your emotions, and noboy cares.
 
Varrak 说:
KhergitLancer80 说:
What emotions ?

You claimed Dest45 to "insulted" you (he didn't, he just wrote a fact)

Then you wrote that FBohler and me were so rude, while we just stated facts.

You can't deal with facts and feel sad is nothing to do with us, but your emotions, and noboy cares.

1-I am locking topic after this respond since all the points are made and it is obvious that you are just going to continue the squabble instead of making an interesting point.

2-Calling someone pseudo-intellectual is not stating facts you are still trying to be offensive by calling it a fact.
Pseudo-intellectual is an offensive thing to say as obvious.
Not that I would be offended by a thing that was written by Dest45 nor that I would with you agreeing with it but it was rude.
For me you two are unaware of basic rules of arguing and it is not my problem to teach you them.


3-About FBohler he was changing my arguements in order to make himself right.This is called straw man fallacy.
While I was suggesting devs a thing he manipulated it by saying ''They're just a loud minority that thinks their opinion is more valuable than yours just because... Realism!''

''The moment they start to try to make you look silly with "he wants helicopters in the game" attacks, just ignore them.''
He also was trying to create an imaginary group of ''people who want realism'' and he was denigrating this so called group.
This is called Ad Hominem fallacy.

4-I have already stated the facts from my first entry and all you guys have been doing since then was crying, mocking, denigrating.
Sorry but I have failed to see a single arguement made by you guys let alone a fact.It seems like you are the ones that are unable to ''deal with the facts''.
 
状态
不接受进一步回复。
后退
顶部 底部