Few hours later than I intended, someone literally set themselves on fire at work.
MaHuD 说:
Its because if a spy would pop up in a team like xardob aust and either grimmend or melter, you would know that there is atleast one spy in that group but it wouldnt clear the other either as its still possible that there is a spy as well.
Well, as Xardob states later, I'm actually partial to gathering more information here, then future leaders will maybe re-integrate Grimmend and Melter, but this is a fair point.
Of course if one is a spy the other likely isn't. If they go together its easier to splitt the spies into groups plus there is a chance that if they are both good you kind of HAVE to bring them onboard.
Here is where I disagree, I see no reason it's more or less likely that they are both spies, and consider it a possibility to be explored in later teams.
To Twinkle in general, you seem really eager in a way that puts me off. I'm not personally champing at the bit to add you to the team, especially when I have several candidates already. I'll let future leaders decide on that one. I see no post of yours that requires a direct response, but let me know if there was something.
Xardob 说:
I'm leaning towards me, Aust and Soot. I think it's a good idea to have different players in the team, so that we have information on everyone, come the end of the game.
SootShade 说:
Yeah, I kinda agree with that, especially as that includes me in the team. Besides, despite the first mission passing I don't actually feel too good about Grimm and Face yet, though it's mostly gut, and I'd rather see them at least talk a little more before putting them on another team. On the other hand I feel like I have something to judge Xardob and Aust on right now, and would kinda want to put them to further test.
As it happens, I agree. Not just with the team, but also with your addendum, Soot. Exactly how I feel.
MaHuD 说:
It is good to get varied intel, but that mission team will certainly have at least 1 spy
I disagree, as Xardob said...
Xardob 说:
Only if you believe both Grimm and Melter are innocents.
I'm not taking that for granted just yet.
MaHuD 说:
No 1 of them being good is enough. It is highly unlikely that they are both evil, but perhaps its a master strat of them.
You've said it twice but... I mean what are you basing this on? I think it's very possible.
Phonemelter 说:
Between Xardob and Aust, my guess is one of them is a spy who was just rejecting the mission to distance themselves from the voting of their packies (regardless of the team make-up, since chances are the first mission was going to pass anyways, spies or no spies). I am leaning towards that being Xardob right now because Aust seems more genuine in his concerns about the voting while Xardob decided to wait until after the mission has been approved to say "lol I have a gut feeling about Face."
This is a fair concern, but I'm still attached to that team make-up. Perhaps if this mission fails, then keep Sootshade as an option and count myself and Xardob out?
So in final, while I see the appeal of Grimmend and Phonemelter going again, I think that we should do that once we have more information on other players first. Let's fit them in for the 3rd or 4th missions. Would you approve or reject Myself, Sootshade and Xardob?
Forgive a lack of proof-reading, it's late.
