[Resistance] Avalon: Minions of Mordred Win!

正在查看此主题的用户

I agree that I feel Grimmend is innocent as I've said before, he is quiet of course, he usually is, but his posts are reading innocent. Twinkle smell like a wolf to me, especially with that sappy 'I'm so sorry it failed, I know you should be suspicious of me, so please do!' post. I like Melter's contributions but I'm sticking to my guns that one of the original two is a spy, and I just don't think that it's Grimmend. Melter is certainly an accomplished enough player to woo me as a villain. MaHuD is a spy, no elaboration needed, letting that mission peter out...

I would vote for either team, although I'm not sure how many mission failures we can afford. Just now I looked over the OP and I'm not sure exactly when the spies win.
 
I have been a bit consumed by Werewolf and exams, but I should have plenty of time to sort out my stance on the game now. so I'll aim to deliver my recommendations for the next team today.
 
I should mention that I am only going to have phone access the next three or four days due to going to the middle of nowhere, but I should be able to find a signal and give quick thoughts every now and again.

@Aust: Accomplished player? This is only my second game of Resistance, and I was so terrible in the first one that I basically suggested an all-spy team in the final mission. Maybe you should have been ignoring my contributions on principle  :lol:
 
Phonemelter 说:
I was so terrible in the first one that I basically suggested an all-spy team in the final mission.

Ah yes. The event which turned you into a potato squared. I remember it fondly.

 
Smiley is unintentional, I tend to hit them while zooming my phone in and out. If anything I'd want to use  :razz: or :meh:
 
Grimm. I would really really love it if you could talk. Like, at least tell me why you rejected both of the previous two teams. Because of Xardob both times? Or different players in each case?

I've been looking at the last two votes for some time now, but I can't really make a clear conclusion based on them. From what I can tell the spies aren't at least voting completely along the same pattern, but I suppose that's to be expected. It would be easy to go with my previous read and swapping out Face for Grimm, but there are some issues with that. While Aust seems by far the most genuine in trying to sort out the game for the resistance, I don't really like that he voted along with the last team, even though that was maybe simply down to us differing in our reads in regards to Grimm and Face despite agreeing otherwise. Mahud rejecting a team that failed a mission does also speak in his favor, especially as it fits what he's saying. On the other hand, I can't take his read on the game seriously no matter how I think about it, and it might have been simply that he was expecting Grimm to vote for that team, thus making it fairly likely to pass. Xardob and Face I'm currently suspecting purely on principle, because of how their votes landed, and because I have yet to get particularly strong innocent reads from either, despite them generally making sense. Twinkle I don't feel like taking a risk on at all, even though I'm not sure that he's a spy quite yet, as he might have just been stranded out of the resistance grouping that I was thinking on because of Xardob who slipped in potentially being spy.

I think the most likely team to succeed would be me, Aust and Grimmend, and thus it's the team I would most like to go with right now. I'm not sure who the fourth person would then be, but I think the fourth mission is marked to require two spies to sabotage? In which case if we pass this mission, it would seem to make it pretty safe to go to the next one with the same one regardless of the addition. It would also be very revealing to me personally if that team actually failed. Xardob, Face and Twinkle in a team could reveal quite a bit also, but on the other hand there's no one in that team on whose role I have any certainty on, and so it would be pretty hard for me to judge if it failed with only one sabotage. It also strikes me as a chance for Xardob to frame two already suspect players if he's a spy. Besides, after one failed quest I don't want to risk anything more.
 
Austupaio 说:
Just now I looked over the OP and I'm not sure exactly when the spies win.

The spies win when three missions have failed (ie, been successfully sabotaged).

Team rejections do not count as failures, and you are allowed up to five team rejections for any one mission. If you have five rejections for one mission, the spies win by default.
 
Well, I stated a while ago about my suspicions of Aust, Soot, and yourself, and I have yet to see anything significant that says otherwise.
 
\_0_0_/  I don't like Aust, and if I had to pick a spy from the team I picked, I'd choose you. There's no particular reason to assume I'm any more guilty than you or Grim, but I don't expect a team with me on it t move forward. I'm just not a big fan of a team with you or Aust on it.

~Twinkle, who hasn't got much to say
 
Grimmend 说:
Well, I stated a while ago about my suspicions of Aust, Soot, and yourself, and I have yet to see anything significant that says otherwise.
There is no ****ing scenario where all three of us are spies AND stupid enough to align ourselves with each other like that. Now please, just move past that insane idea and do something constructive, will you?
 
That puts me in an interesting position. I can't think of a single team that would be approved, let alone successfully complete the mission. I'll give some more thought, but if nothing changes until tomorrow, I'll most likely suggest a team just to see how it'll get rejected.
 
Phonemelter 说:
I'll be back to civilization tomorrow and give my input then.
Quickly guys! Before Melter returns! :wink:

~Twinkle, who notes that when trying to keep Melter from spelling your name wrong, one must simply never give him the chance to speak
 
后退
顶部 底部