RCC Server Main Thread [Beta 7] [Rules Translation/s added! - Swedish & Italian]

[Raging Womble]

Who was the guy I rped with yesterday? His name was Grumpy Herdsman.

On another note, I will stay on this server now I have had it with uniteds admins.

 

[The Bowman]

Had fun playing on this server again today! Will hopefully be on tomorrow!

I hope you *sigh* didn't forget the Drunk *sigh* Bard, you fools! *sigh*

 

[Vuffeh]

Had fun playing on this server again today! Will hopefully be on tomorrow!

I hope you *sigh* didn't forget the Drunk *sigh* Bard, you fools! *sigh*

Y U BE SO DRUNK?!

 

[Metalhead259]

Map has been updated with bugfixes and a few minor additions.
Should be a bit more playable now.

And bug reports/map suggestions should be sent in PM's to myself and N0body.

 

[Elduar_Rhinestone]

I remember playing with you RCC guys once on United or something, had a great time. I'll definetly go check this server out right now 

 

[Deserath]

Woohoo! Welcome Back RCC, maybe when I'm not swamped by Work I can swing through.

 

[Metalhead259]

Woohoo! Welcome Back RCC, maybe when I'm not swamped by Work I can swing through.

We got good ol'VoS on the server now.

 

[Яowan]

Thread has been updated.

Opinions on the rules please!

 

[Deserath]

Add a small Section regarding Metagaming and the restrictions on that.

 

[Dark_Hamlet]

* Randoming can often result in a KOS being placed on your head for 10 mins by any admin or community support member.


I liked it, but killing the agent on sight won't create more problems with NLR and randoming?

 

[Peton]

* Randoming can often result in a KOS being placed on your head for 10 mins by any admin or community support member.


I liked it, but killing the agent on sight won't create more problems with NLR and randoming?

This rule was used far in the past versions of PW, and i quite liked it.

In my personal opinion this is more of a way the players can deal with randomers themselves in the absence of an admin, basically vigilante justice. It provides a bit of entertainment aswell, consider it like a deadly mass murderer being on the loose and anyone who spots him has the approval of the Town Guard to kill him on sight.

This of course is also a punishment for the randomer (if hes not been kicked/warned for randoming already). However i can assure you while i am administrating i shall not be using the KOS option often at all, it will be a rare sight from me.

 

[Deserath]

Well who decides they randomed if an Admin isn't around? It could lead to some issues.

 

[Suspicous Pilgrim]

It's usually up to the playerbase. If two dudes are arguing about who randomed who, chances are the average non-dumbass will try to not attack.


Remove the taxing rule and replace it with a "don't overtax" rule instead.

 

[Boarlady]

Playerbase-issued KOS+ average PW player= Bad idea

You will have unfair KOS every time someone is robbed of gold or silver.

 

[Azrayel]

Playerbase-issued KOS+ average PW player= Bad idea

I've seen similar things happen non-sanctioned on HCRP. Like the time KingKiller's pals claimed my faction was a "randomer faction" and kept flooding into my castle, murdering left and right.

They got away with it and I was not refunded, despite us finally getting an admin on.

So, maybe it's better that the admins at least be more cognizant of these things rather than plugging their ears and pretending they're not the regular- 'cause vigilantism is common on basically all PW servers.

Back in the day, we'd just kill them and take screens of their randoming. Whenever we got them to n0b he'd logBan them and that'dB that.

 

[Wolvie1]

It's usually up to the playerbase. If two dudes are arguing about who randomed who, chances are the average non-dumbass will try to not attack.


Remove the taxing rule and replace it with a "don't overtax" rule instead.

Uhm, Dont overtax?  You cant know if someone is utterly rich. That is OOC information, which will mean its metagaming. The taxing rule therefore is as fine as it is.

 

[xombie5]

It's usually up to the playerbase. If two dudes are arguing about who randomed who, chances are the average non-dumbass will try to not attack.


Remove the taxing rule and replace it with a "don't overtax" rule instead.

Uhm, Dont overtax?  You cant know if someone is utterly rich. That is OOC information, which will mean its metagaming. The taxing rule therefore is as fine as it is.

i disagree - look at their clothes and weapons, check what is in their cart. maybe you saw them on a trade route earlier. it cant tell you if they are rich but it can tell you if you should be able to think they are rich.

 

[Peton]

Well who decides they randomed if an Admin isn't around? It could lead to some issues.

Answer:

* Randoming can often result in a KOS being placed on your head for 10 mins by any admin or community support member.

Also you should see an admin on at all nearly all times, if i hear theres no admin on the server i shall immediately log on myself.

Playerbase-issued KOS+ average PW player= Bad idea

You will have unfair KOS every time someone is robbed of gold or silver.

That would not occur, as it is not for petty theft and as said above it is issued by an admin or community support member, not an average player, if an average player attempted to place a KOS on someones head i would expect them to be punished by any availible admin on the server. This system worked pretty well in the past with the old playerbase, so consider this a 'trial period', testing if it works with this newer playerbase and version.

Back in the day, we'd just kill them and take screens of their randoming. Whenever we got them to n0b he'd logBan them and that'dB that.

Thats the kind of simple system id like back aswell, when i got randomed i would normally go into spectator and follow the randomer, taking screens for the next 2 minutes or so, then upload them and show them to N0body, normally id have enough screens of random attacks that the player would be log banned.

Spoiler

It's usually up to the playerbase. If two dudes are arguing about who randomed who, chances are the average non-dumbass will try to not attack.


Remove the taxing rule and replace it with a "don't overtax" rule instead.

Uhm, Dont overtax?  You cant know if someone is utterly rich. That is OOC information, which will mean its metagaming. The taxing rule therefore is as fine as it is.

i disagree - look at their clothes and weapons, check what is in their cart. maybe you saw them on a trade route earlier. it cant tell you if they are rich but it can tell you if you should be able to think they are rich.

That is true Leroy, however you would have the issues of people looking for a loophole, i myself would prefer a 'Don't over tax, be reasonable' rule but having a cap is a lot easier to follow & enforce, i'll have to have a chat with other admins about that.

 

[Illusive Man]

The rules say you can't tax/rob more than 1000 gold, but they also say "Don't tax or rob!" 

 

[Wolvie1]

It's usually up to the playerbase. If two dudes are arguing about who randomed who, chances are the average non-dumbass will try to not attack.


Remove the taxing rule and replace it with a "don't overtax" rule instead.

Uhm, Dont overtax?  You cant know if someone is utterly rich. That is OOC information, which will mean its metagaming. The taxing rule therefore is as fine as it is.

Yes, but say, I have an empty card, I have  a pickaxe, and civil clothes, I banked most of my current money alot of time ago, went serf, and get ready to mine.

i disagree - look at their clothes and weapons, check what is in their cart. maybe you saw them on a trade route earlier. it cant tell you if they are rich but it can tell you if you should be able to think they are rich.

Then there should be like heavy armored/ traders 2-3k max. It all depends on it. Overtaxing will happen otherwise.