Spanish_Broomaker
Sergeant

I always see that all the lords of Calradia have endless troops prisoners in their castles or towns, my question is, why do I need to aggressively take over the castle to liberate them and have them in my service? In my current game I am Swadian I don't really like Khergits, but we are at peace for the moment, no lords in their side have a bad relationship toward me, I am suggesting to be able to go up to a Khergit lord and pay him a ransom for the 10 Swadian Man-at-arms he has in his castle. I also noticed some fellow Swadian lords have some prisoners I want in my service. I figure, why wouldn't they work for me? Since I liberate them from such a miserable existence like staying in the dungeon of some fat lord!
I think this would lead to lords asking for prisoners I have, I may have Nord Huskarls and some Nord lord wants to liberate them.
How about sides trading enemy lords? Lords buying an enemy lord from an ally to sell him for more money back to the enemy? I was thinking, I saw an enemy lord in Nord hands, why can't I ransom him, and hold him for a higher ransom (to make profit).
What do you think?
I think this would lead to lords asking for prisoners I have, I may have Nord Huskarls and some Nord lord wants to liberate them.
How about sides trading enemy lords? Lords buying an enemy lord from an ally to sell him for more money back to the enemy? I was thinking, I saw an enemy lord in Nord hands, why can't I ransom him, and hold him for a higher ransom (to make profit).
What do you think?


