I don't usually break up posts this much but seems everything you said was in bad faith:
The game breaking "leash" nerf shifts in distance from 1cm to 100 meters, it's all over the place.
Any suggestion falls apart if you only consider the extremes. 1cm would be terrible. 100m would do nothing. But you can't use the extremes to discredit a balanced approach. That's reduction to absurdity.
My poll argument cannot be misunderstood, and the poll questions are really really simple.
"Make it impossible to park any class." Taken literally, this implies that F1F1 is removed from the game, along with the majority of commands as they rely on parking your troops temporarily. You specifically used "impossible" which means that temporary parks are impossible, so you couldn't temporarily park troops to rearrange them or hold a different angle, or basically anything.
Axios, who voted for this, clearly thought this meant a leash feature of an average distance to kill rambo. That's what I thought as well, the first time I saw it. It's not simple. It's unclear and confusing.
If you take a list of common proposals, then replace one of the proposals with something that sounds similar but is worded in a way that means something different, of course people are going to be confused.
At this point this feels like a deliberate attempt to discredit something that you personally feel would be bad for the game, by reaching for extremes and redefining the suggestion to be as easy as possible to refute.
And it does not surprise me that you are against any of my suggestions, since you are the one that have come up with this restriction in the first place.
The "leash" predates Bannerlord by half a decade as it was used in all major NW commander battle servers. Furthermore, I wasn't the first to propose this on the forums, that was a former NW player I'm pretty sure.
And I can see you resort to a personal attack on the CL discord. "Bad wording". Personal attacks is what people do if they run out of any real arguments. What's next, you going to make a list of all my spelling errors? Do me a favor, stay on topic.
Saying that poor wording confused people isn't a personal attack.
The "leash" idea was suggested to fight the rambo meta. But the effort for the dev's to implement this "feature" would be a waste of time. Time they rather should use on the core problems of the mode. AI mechanics, Faction balance and Viable unit classes. Those fixes will make the rambo meta obsolete. Since all classes will be able to repel or even kill 1 single cav that is attacking your troops.
If you buff anti-cav AI for ground troops, then rambo will be even more necessary because your entire squad of cav will be wiped when you charge in, compared to rambo, where you can get much higher value out of each individual unit rather than throw them away for low to no value.
There's not a single person that thinks faction balance and viable troops classes shouldn't be a priority.