wtf are you talking about LMAO, no one is talking about making the player slower, learn to read, I said making the AI the same speed as the player, currently they are slower than the player, and I am talking more about cavalry than infantry
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Rambo should always be a part of captain to an extent
Users who are viewing this thread
wtf are you talking about LMAO, no one is talking about making the player slower, learn to read, I said making the AI the same speed as the player, currently they are slower than the player, and I am talking more about cavalry than infantry
Nerfing player speed on horseback and on foot has always been a part of the discussion over captain mode. If you did any reading you would know that.
learn to read again
learn to right click
learn to f1 f3
learn press x
learn to code
Captain mode is a joke. I've watched a few streams from the PoV of the "seasoned veterans", and it baffles me how even they often cannot predict the outcome of an AI stack facing another. Imagine wanting to compete on a gamemode where the outcomes of "honest" matches are centered around the AI code of its respective game version. Then have the audacity to cry because people play around said broken AI and use their individual skill to win.
LEM()N
Recruit
Why can't they just remove the ability to respawn from your remaining units. It is supposed to be captain mod not skirmish with extra lives lol. It baffled me, when I first played Captains mode, that you could just respawn if you had units still alive. They could make it so Captain players could customize their captain player so their player is unique compared to the units that are commanded (better armor/weapons and a horse if you want it)
Taleworlds should have spent some time of the last 9(?) years to bring up a coop campaing. If they did, no one would play this meme mode. Captain is a competitiv mode for people who dont want to play competitive - no sense made. You cant balance this out because the idea is crap from the start.
Only solution to keep your safe space is to keep the competitiv players out of your mode. Why did you even except skirmish teams to a tournament when it's obvious they just want to troll you?
Only solution to keep your safe space is to keep the competitiv players out of your mode. Why did you even except skirmish teams to a tournament when it's obvious they just want to troll you?
They thought they could beat them unironically and now they are complaining about the meta after they got clapped
It's not anything new actually.
Keyboard Warriors got 3rd /4th place in the first Captain's leauge prior experience.
I honestly love what Ling and the Captain's league are doing and for those Captain teams it's a shame that the mode get's neglected.
Keyboard Warriors got 3rd /4th place in the first Captain's leauge prior experience.
I honestly love what Ling and the Captain's league are doing and for those Captain teams it's a shame that the mode get's neglected.
D0c1
Knight at Arms
they said long ago that they won't do it because it can't be implemented in a "fun way" (what to do with time when someone enters a town and the otheris traveling and those stuff).
and that a mod could do it.
More likely it would take too much time/resources. GIven the time and size of the team working on the co-op mod I am inclined to agree. I'd love co-op but there are many more important things which need worked on first.
This.
But also
This.
Interesting, meta is meta, if you follow it, you produce results, so DM did that + can fight and play the core mechanics of the game proper.
I see a clear winner decided, also it's very unfortunate that the competitiveness of Captain Mode is partially disproved by this and it's coming again down to combat effectiveness of the single player.
No AI improvement will fix the underlying core issue that the skirmish player is taking down 5-10++ bots while the captain mode player takes down (I'm speculating tbh, I have no idea) 2-5.
Well said. I mean well sad. Sad!
I still contend a major portion of this was nerfing Formations to hell. This was a mistake and needs to be undone. You worked hard on the formations, just let us use the damn things.
I've suggested this so many times I've lost count. It is the best solution that does not modify mechanics in any game-changing ways. It rewards Captains for staying with their troops without breaking it for people who don't.
If you combined this with the "Overwhelming Odds Multiplier", and even slightly pumped up unit counts, we could stop having this conversation every week. Plz Taleworlds, plz.
It feels like this is all we've talked about on this damn forum for 9 months, since the "Menav Age" ended.
Last edited:
The idea is GOOD, it’s reminds me of Total War Arena in a way, but even that was done badly.
It’s the execution/implementation that’s horrendous.
This is an option in the Napoleonic Wars Captain mode. I like it, it raises the tension quite a lot, but I don't think it should be the only mode. Maybe 10 bots ought to be able to shoot a single moving target out of the saddle.
Being good at the game isn't the problem. Its hiding your bots and attacking the other player alone. Which is cheap and makes the game take about 5 times longer than it would be if you attacked as a unit. If these guys are so good, they ought to be able to win without resorting to a well-known Captain mode exploit that would have got them vote-kicked 10 years ago.
It seems like people have a hard time understanding what captain mode is supposed to be. This is what TW intended:
"combine individual player skill with teamwork and tactical prowess to succeed"
"ultimately it is better tactics and teamwork which will determine the winner"
So from this video, we can see that individual skill i.e. "rambo" has a place in the game, however it should not be the sole decider of who wins.
I don't see why players should expect anything different from this description to be the goal of balancing.
"combine individual player skill with teamwork and tactical prowess to succeed"
"ultimately it is better tactics and teamwork which will determine the winner"
So from this video, we can see that individual skill i.e. "rambo" has a place in the game, however it should not be the sole decider of who wins.
I don't see why players should expect anything different from this description to be the goal of balancing.
