OmegaNovaios
Recruit
It is a "Catch 22" when proposing to give the settlement to someone else. If the vote concludes with "Yes", then there is an extremely high chance if not guaranteed that the exact same person will receive the settlement through a vote among three people.
For instance I spent 1500 influence (while "save scumming" different results) one time it took all 1500 points just to get a "Yes" with majority votes because the Ruler kept overriding with a "No", and the 1st choice to give the settlement to was the same person with 100% vote. Another time I managed to get a "Yes" and have 300 influence points left; enough influence to put the original owner at ~15% vote and myself at ~85% vote and the Ruler gave an overruling to give it back to the original owner.
What is the point in having a "someone else vote" when it is just going to revert to a "the AI personality revolves around hidden statistics (which should not be "hidden statistics" but should be policies that can override as a democracy/council government like other policies take away from the power of a Ruler) loophole vote".
For instance I spent 1500 influence (while "save scumming" different results) one time it took all 1500 points just to get a "Yes" with majority votes because the Ruler kept overriding with a "No", and the 1st choice to give the settlement to was the same person with 100% vote. Another time I managed to get a "Yes" and have 300 influence points left; enough influence to put the original owner at ~15% vote and myself at ~85% vote and the Ruler gave an overruling to give it back to the original owner.
What is the point in having a "someone else vote" when it is just going to revert to a "the AI personality revolves around hidden statistics (which should not be "hidden statistics" but should be policies that can override as a democracy/council government like other policies take away from the power of a Ruler) loophole vote".
