
which I find slightly odd as we are using Concentration as one of the factors for consideration, and I am under the impression that they both increase the number of effective collisions, thus increasing the rate. My initial hypothesis was that surface area does not modify the base reaction rate for individual collisions, but the same would be true for Concentration, if I understand correctly, and thus I am stumped.Why is surface area not a factor for consideration for the rate of a reaction?

You're welcome.Lyze 说:By the gods, why didn't I read the reactants that were involved. Of course not. Bloody hell.
Thanks AK. I feel suitably idiotic now.
Speed of light is measured in km/s. "Twirling" is measured in r/s. See the problem?kiarj 说:Damn... Okay, so I'm stuck:
What would theoretically happen if a black hole would create a vacuum effect that would cause it to twirl above the speed of light?
My first answer was : It'd collapse on itself, but that doesn't work with a black hole, does it?

AK47 说:Speed of light is measured in km/s. "Twirling" is measured in r/s. See the problem?kiarj 说:Damn... Okay, so I'm stuck:
What would theoretically happen if a black hole would create a vacuum effect that would cause it to twirl above the speed of light?
My first answer was : It'd collapse on itself, but that doesn't work with a black hole, does it?


It's a thing with special relativity, if you can move information or matter faster than light, there will be point where the information/matter is moving back in time. Time dilation - time goes slower the higher your velocity is.Soil 说:Um. What makes you think that it's time travel?


