jros83
Banned
Until recently I just tolerated Betty's antics. I figured the admins were doing a good enough job banning her whenever she wold pop up. But now that Betty has started to put a group together, and also that Betty is impersonating other players with a certain degree of success, I think, at the corporate level, it's time for a hard and even draconian solution.
It's apparent Betty has no problem continually buying keys*. Considering troublemakers rarely have the wherewithall or diligence to find ways around, I was wondering if perhaps, at the corporate level, her mean of financing her purchases, say if it is by credit card, could be blocked. I know some think IP blocking is a solution, but many ISPs use dynamic IPs, so whatever IP you block one day probably won't be their IP the next. Now, if Betty is using a "keygen," then that's a different story (I don't know if those really work or are a viable means to cheat the system, as I've always liked to keep things legit).
Perhaps the business philosophy, if it isn't an actual law, is anyone can get back after a solid ban by purchasing the content again, perhaps as a means to tell the person "why would you keep wanting to spend money? is it worth it?" For most troublemakers, that works. But Betty seems to be a peculiar and atypical case. And due to the fanaticism she or he displays towards their griefing, I would imagine a more draconian step would be warranted.
I am sure at the corporate level there are logs of how this person is making their purchase. Unless there is a law that stops corporate from doing so, I think the best solution to the Betty problem would be simply blocking their means of payment.
*If it IS a keygen software.... Well then I just don't know.
It's apparent Betty has no problem continually buying keys*. Considering troublemakers rarely have the wherewithall or diligence to find ways around, I was wondering if perhaps, at the corporate level, her mean of financing her purchases, say if it is by credit card, could be blocked. I know some think IP blocking is a solution, but many ISPs use dynamic IPs, so whatever IP you block one day probably won't be their IP the next. Now, if Betty is using a "keygen," then that's a different story (I don't know if those really work or are a viable means to cheat the system, as I've always liked to keep things legit).
Perhaps the business philosophy, if it isn't an actual law, is anyone can get back after a solid ban by purchasing the content again, perhaps as a means to tell the person "why would you keep wanting to spend money? is it worth it?" For most troublemakers, that works. But Betty seems to be a peculiar and atypical case. And due to the fanaticism she or he displays towards their griefing, I would imagine a more draconian step would be warranted.
I am sure at the corporate level there are logs of how this person is making their purchase. Unless there is a law that stops corporate from doing so, I think the best solution to the Betty problem would be simply blocking their means of payment.
*If it IS a keygen software.... Well then I just don't know.


