POLL: Ranked matchmaking

How much do you feel ranked is needed?

  • 0 - No need at all

  • 1 - Not really bothered, but I don't mind.

  • 2 - It might be a good idea, but I don't care much.

  • 3 - It has a purpose, but definitely not a priority

  • 4 - It should be there, but very low down the list

  • 5 - It should be there, but there are many other more important issues.

  • 6 - It's an important feature, but not too high in the priority

  • 7 - High priority feature, but there are others that come first.

  • 8 - Very high priority. Should be among the first.

  • 9 - Highest priority. They should drop everything else if needed and deliver it with the next patch.


投票后才可看到结果。

正在查看此主题的用户

Ranked matchmaking is bull**** in this game.
I like that there are better and less good players on the same battlefield.
If your bad in the game, than simply get better in it, or try playing in a team
 
Ask yourself this: Is it fun for a new player to fight against players with 4k hours?

It's needed, at least for modes with low player counts, but there are more important issues right now.
 
Ranked matchmaking is bull**** in this game.
I like that there are better and less good players on the same battlefield.
If your bad in the game, than simply get better in it, or try playing in a team
No problem, there can be both ranked and unranked mm at the same time. You don't have to choose.

It's needed
It's absolutely necessary for competitive community to form imo.
 
As long as it's 1v1, because your skill has very little impact in 6v6 if your teammates are newbs, otherwise this will just turn into another generic "team based pvp" that makes you think you can "get gut" when in reality it's all about whoever can que up with better invited teammates or whoever is lucky enough to get some smurf or tryhard on his team.
 
As long as it's 1v1, because your skill has very little impact in 6v6 if your teammates are newbs, otherwise this will just turn into another generic "team based pvp" that makes you think you can "get gut" when in reality it's all about whoever can que up with better invited teammates or whoever is lucky enough to get some smurf or tryhard on his team.
I'm not an expert on how ranked mm works, but doesn't it take into account the overall team's skill so the situation where a team of newbies is carried by a high-skilled player is less likely if not avoided completely?
 
Ranked matchmaking is bull**** in this game.
I like that there are better and less good players on the same battlefield.
If your bad in the game, than simply get better in it, or try playing in a team
I know people who are tired of playing against such noobs as you, that are leaving after they lose 1 round. Matchmaking is anyway confirmed.
 
I'm not an expert on how ranked mm works, but doesn't it take into account the overall team's skill so the situation where a team of newbies is carried by a high-skilled player is less likely if not avoided completely?
Ranked team matchmaking works good in Starcraft 2. Not sure how, but you can take a look there. :wink:
 
I'm not an expert on how ranked mm works, but doesn't it take into account the overall team's skill so the situation where a team of newbies is carried by a high-skilled player is less likely if not avoided completely?
There is no way for any MM system to determine your skill, alot of mainstream games have bare bones matchmaker that just tracks your wins and loses, or just straight up fills u up to some random match, not only that but since you can play SP, the experience difference of new MP players is going to be huge. My point is if they ever implement ranked matchmaking, it should strictly be 1v1 because otherwise your skill has around 10% impact in each game, and that is just sad. Bigger battles outside of a duel are supposed be casual and it's what makes warband MP great. This game wasn't even designed as some team based pvp with support or tank classes.
Also if we are talking competitively, then class selection screen is just a huge rock paper scissors with the enemy...
 
最后编辑:
There is no way for any MM system to determine your skill, alot of mainstream games have bare bones matchmaker that just tracks your wins and loses, or just straight up fills u up to some random match, not only that but since you can play SP, the experience difference of new MP players is going to be huge. My point is if they ever implement ranked matchmaking, it should strictly be 1v1 because otherwise your skill has around 10% impact in each game, and that is just sad. Bigger battles outside of a duel are supposed be casual and it's what makes warband MP great. This game wasn't even designed as some team based pvp with support or tank classes.
Also if we are talking competitively, then class selection screen is just a huge rock paper scissors with the enemy...
I have a friend who regularly plays Dota and he says that their MMR system does the job quite well. I can't tell since I don't play the game, but I was confident that the systems that could handle that exist.
 
I know people who are tired of playing against such noobs as you, that are leaving after they lose 1 round. Matchmaking is anyway confirmed.
Nice one, declaring me an noob, knowing nothing about me. I used to play in clans for many years and im not bad in the game. But declaring me instant as a noob, Pretty mature my friend.
Man your such a pathetic person.
About the ragequitting, who doesnt say that this isnt possible in higherranks as well?
I dont want the mount and blade community becomming as toxic as the lol community. Your a good example on how it should NOT be.
I expirienced so many great teamplayers in warband, i dont want that it changes to a bunch of little kids who only play the game for winning and not for the fun itself.
I loved the games for the sake of the game itself and not for the win. And mount and blade games are fun, no matter you won or lost the round.
But with little wannabe pros like you, it might become just another toxic community like lol dota and all the other wannabepros.
 
后退
顶部 底部