Alec{zacool} said:You have now crossed the line into, "I have a bigger penis than you so therefore I am cooler and I am better and I do not care what you think because my opinion is the best in the world".
Not only that, but more.
Alec{zacool} said:You are one of the players that turtle with 2+ shields, right? With the speed reduction with 2+ shields, no wonder you can't manoeuvre away from cavalry.
Yep. To be precise i never use 2 shields. Fail.
Alec{zacool} said:You have to understand that just because you are too stubborn to use a class/playstyle that is a counter to the other classes/playstyles that win against your current class/playstyle, it doesn't mean that it's OP.
I play different classes, and different builds. Another fail.
Alec{zacool} said:You seem to imply that I am a "noob" trying to be able to hold onto easy kills via "horse ******ry". As I said before, I am a crossbowman.
No, you are xbow noob that have little knowledge about horse combat and melee against horses.
Alec{zacool} said:Horses are now too easy to defeat. They are easier than fighting an infantry or an archer/crossbowman. That is what I've been trying to say the entire time.
Have you fought against good horseman this patch ? I would rather fight against 2 infantry/xbowman/archers than two horseman. They are strong. Just require some skill. Also, on foot they also can do good.
Alec{zacool} said:Horses do require skill, just like any other class. You can't just "Hold W", like many people say all it is, in a gametype other than deathmatch. People like you just don't bother to look behind them for the cavalry which is waiting for them to get engaged in melee.
Right now they require skill, in .711 it was skill less feast. I do good against any foe, and my situational awareness is quite good, so your random accusation is another big failure.
Alec{zacool} said:Horses before were a support class, not a big fighting class. They were best at assisting infantry whilst they were fighting. E.G. taking out a troop that is ganking, or horse-bumping an enemy in a 1v1.
No, they owned.
Alec{zacool} said:They are now just free kills.
bull.
Alec{zacool} said:The U.S. and E.U. players might all agree that they are OP, but the Oceanic gamers suffer from absolutely every nerf that's added.
The game is now only centred around infantry.
A wise veteran said, "Mount&Blade should be renamed. It should now be called Mount&Die."
I rest my case.
I can only say, learn to play.
SockMonkeh said:AoC said:You must be complete idiot to not notice it was about .711.
It is serious problem. There should be no 'i win buttons' and no hard counters.
I see you in three current threads complaining about how three different things are over-powered (lancers, horse-archers, and one-handed axes). Have you ever considered that you might be terrible at Warband?
Sure, last time i played i sucked with 46K - 24D with average ping 110. I suck so hard, and i'm terrible at warband.
EDIT: I just ragequitted again with sucky 6K/1D, i suck so hard at warband.