Please make splitscreen for consoles!!!

[Musiokaslt]

Please make atleast battle scenarios available spritscreen with start button and a random picked warrior of the army taken control of. We dont have the luxury of mods, please let us have the enjoyability of two to four buds having a hacking and slashing time together, as in warriors orochi.

 

[Allias]

I don't think they will be doing that. And I would suggest instead of us trying to come up with new buckets of features and demanding those, instead demand the initial features promised, and the ones that are already imported to be fixed instead. Game is not in a good state.

 

[black_bulldog]

Taleworlds has said repeatedly that they will never make Bannerlord coop, maybe some talented modder can do it but Taleworld devs have said they don't know how to do it because of the time stoppage for the pc in battles and towns/villages.

 

[benli11]

Taleworlds has said repeatedly that they will never make Bannerlord coop, maybe some talented modder can do it but Taleworld devs have said they don't know how to do it because of the time stoppage for the pc in battles and towns/villages.

What op saying is, he want co-op in battles. not in campain map. maybe they can do something about that.

 

[Goyyyio]

What op saying is, he want co-op in battles. not in campain map. maybe they can do something about that.

They won't, and it will never happen. Not trying to be an ******* here just trying to manage expectations, Taleworlds repeatedly said no to this and if they even took down features they did make imagine the ones that were never planned.

 

[MariusTitus]

Taleworlds has said repeatedly that they will never make Bannerlord coop, maybe some talented modder can do it but Taleworld devs have said they don't know how to do it because of the time stoppage for the pc in battles and towns/villages.

It wouldn't be actually that hard to make:

1) Have game run at normal speed, all the time, no stopping/fast speed. Battles take 10m usually, not that much time. Campaign map speed would be slow, but that's a tax for other players being able to lead parties.
2) Travel speed/time stopping stays, host leads the party, while other players are in as companions. They'd see campaign map with their party moving, but only host would control it and decide where to move/what to do, et cetera.

 

[black_bulldog]

It wouldn't be actually that hard to make:

1) Have game run at normal speed, all the time, no stopping/fast speed. Battles take 10m usually, not that much time. Campaign map speed would be slow, but that's a tax for other players being able to lead parties.
2) Travel speed/time stopping stays, host leads the party, while other players are in as companions. They'd see campaign map with their party moving, but only host would control it and decide where to move/what to do, et cetera.

Warband had a few mods that let players join another person's battles and it was kind of janky but worked, sort of. But even with people begging for coop over the years and all the updates to Warband they never made any attempt to add it to the base game or even in VC either. I suspect they just figure it's not worth their time to do something like this. If they don't want to add a feature they won't, but good luck trying.

 

[MariusTitus]

Warband had a few mods that let players join another person's battles and it was kind of janky but worked, sort of. But even with people begging for coop over the years and all the updates to Warband they never made any attempt to add it to the base game or even in VC either. I suspect they just figure it's not worth their time to do something like this. If they don't want to add a feature they won't, but good luck trying.

Yea, the Battle time mod, it was unwieldy as hell. It's sad they won't add any form of coop, it would add a whole new dynamic to the game, raise the sales because friends would play together, and all that. But what can we want from them if they're unable to send out finished game after 12 years, right..