The problem is: the draw rule has been introduced to avoid a team forcing a draw to gain 1 round without a loss and reduce the chances for opponents to make a poit more, and by this way a match could end 10-9, as an example. At the same it can be exploited to avoid a sure loss and try to have a 10-10 instead of a 11-9.
Rules has been designed and a clan exploited them to reach its goal. In this is case it is clear it cannot be something hmm valiant or brave, but it is still within the rule background. And yes, it is also frustrating for the superior clan in that round.
I don't think you could introduce a subjective way to interpret the rule. 1 vs 5 is not a loss until that 1 is dead. In a madness profile, that 1 could have killed all his opponents spamming or take advantage from the surprise factor, as an example. Rules must have an objective profile.
Rules has been designed and a clan exploited them to reach its goal. In this is case it is clear it cannot be something hmm valiant or brave, but it is still within the rule background. And yes, it is also frustrating for the superior clan in that round.
I don't think you could introduce a subjective way to interpret the rule. 1 vs 5 is not a loss until that 1 is dead. In a madness profile, that 1 could have killed all his opponents spamming or take advantage from the surprise factor, as an example. Rules must have an objective profile.