-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
[PETITION] Rollback/Disable Quit Penalty Indefinitely
- 主题发起人 z00t
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
- 状态
I don't think we should be praising TW for picking one of the gazillion suggestions and implementing it with absolutely horrific timing. Even in most of the threads suggesting it a lot of people noted it should be just for ranked MM. If they actually listened and paid attention to what's going on changes like this likely wouldn't happen.
I'm on board with the idea of formulating something more in-depth, the main issue is our roadmap being so off-kilter to what the devs may have in store (as we don't have their own roadmap in our possession to decipher what needs to be re-ordered) that they take us less seriously than already believed.
The reason why I chalked up it as indefinitely- was because I don't believe anyone thinks the system is bad, or needs to be scrapped- but just it's implementation postponed until they are able to provide us with a means of syncing stacks of 6 for matches- be it through private or passworded servers, or a Clan/Tournament server/client of some sort.
As it stands, organized play will take a serious hit if not die out in EA with it's impending changes before we ever get to private/passworded servers.
最后编辑:
I mean- it took 10 years of people asking about assist statistics and they made it to Bannerlord. Changes that took that long vs things we've asked for in the past few weeks being implemented almost right away is a complete 180 from the old TaleWorlds.
Not that I agree with needing persistent/permanent tracking of assists...but to know who has at least contributed to fights or just died in their role without any positive impact has been really nice during matches.
The only people who don't see TaleWorlds as "listening" are those who have bad-mouthed them year after year, and don't get their own issues addressed wondering why.
I agree that this is not fully implemented (which, incidentally, is noted that the system will change in the future). And no, I do not agree with the petition.
I agree that the system works with those “mod conditions” that do not affect the gameplay in the best way (but it is also worth noting that the development and functions for multiplayer in the future may be supplemented).
And I agree that for players playing in single-player mode, it is necessary to ensure freedom of visiting the siege mode, but for skirmishes and the captain, this is at least logical.
And please do a survey! I'm not going to raise your topic to the first line, in which there is not even a list of those who refused!
I agree that the system works with those “mod conditions” that do not affect the gameplay in the best way (but it is also worth noting that the development and functions for multiplayer in the future may be supplemented).
And I agree that for players playing in single-player mode, it is necessary to ensure freedom of visiting the siege mode, but for skirmishes and the captain, this is at least logical.
And please do a survey! I'm not going to raise your topic to the first line, in which there is not even a list of those who refused!
最后编辑:
You can find objections in this petition thread: https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?threads/petition-dont-rollback-disable-quit-penalty.419226/
Thanks for your input and bump!
Disabling custom servers for modders and making them unable to test balance tweaks, moving siege into matchmaking from server list/limiting parties in siege to 6 thus making it not possible to reliably play together as more than 6 players in siege, not allowing custom games/not even trying to match 6 stacks vs 6 stacks, not listening to community when it comes to balance and issues that have been known since middle of winter and many other small and large things.
And then this? Penalty that will hurt literally everyone who is trying to play skirmish right now, both stacks that want to play against each others and solo players that don't want to get stomped over and over?
Almost all of the changes since the EA release have only hurt multiplayer. I can understand focusing on singleplayer, but it's been 3 weeks already and dedicating one person to balancing and general MP taking-care-of and most importantly to speak to the community about it shouldn't be too hard, should it?
/signed
And then this? Penalty that will hurt literally everyone who is trying to play skirmish right now, both stacks that want to play against each others and solo players that don't want to get stomped over and over?
Almost all of the changes since the EA release have only hurt multiplayer. I can understand focusing on singleplayer, but it's been 3 weeks already and dedicating one person to balancing and general MP taking-care-of and most importantly to speak to the community about it shouldn't be too hard, should it?
/signed
Athenon_FireBlood
/signed
/signed
Thats what I assume will happen too.
Also this means I have no way of playing siege right? Since it crashes constantly and is for some reason still on matchmaking...
Krex makes good points, not sure which one I prefer at this point. Having a separate queue for 6 stacks would solve alot of issues here and you can keep the penalty. ?
Yep theres not even a reconnect option for people that dc'd or crashed. Not tought trough at all.Thats what I assume will happen too.
Also this means I have no way of playing siege right? Since it crashes constantly and is for some reason still on matchmaking...
Krex makes good points, not sure which one I prefer at this point. Having a separate queue for 6 stacks would solve alot of issues here and you can keep the penalty. ?
Listen to those who asked for a quit penalty? You mean the one person who asked for it who was immediately told it would be a bad idea right now?
Feel free to check my search results to find any other threads, because I sure can't find any other relevant discussions on the subject.
If you want to be taken seriously, stop using logical fallacies in all your arguments.
We're here because Taleworlds seems to be incapable of proper communication, and has a poor idea of how to manage a multiplayer game. Nothing more, nothing less.
Sure you can't, have you tried other keywords? I have and found a few of other threads:
And if you at any time feel that I used a logical fallacy, feel free to point it out, but make sure you put a little more effort into uncovering it next time.
- 状态
