Amontadillo said:
It's every time a **** comes along spouting the same crap as the ten before him that the thread gets rather useless, yes.
Unfortunately it seems to be a natural law of the Internet. Then you get useless tossers who got their precious feelings hurt during the previous round rejoin in order to snipe from the bushes, like this:
MickDick said:
The definition of a dogpile.
You're still a clueless tosser who thinks that red flags and GMKs have a secret conspiracy to keep the righteous down, aren't you?
FUBAR!!! said:
I responded to her reply with the same respect she gave me, which was none.
You don't start out with respect, dear Günther-clone, you have to earn it. You also don't get to write or define the rules for either Internet debating or Taleworlds. There is a profanity filter, which you are most welcome to use. Trying to hide behind pleas for "civil behaviour" so that you can continue shouting your stupid bull**** is probably the second-oldest debating "tactic" in the world. It also doesn't work.
FUBAR!!! said:
The military did keep racial minorities in their own regiments up until WW2 when racism started to go down they slowly integrated them with the others, it worked well.
Lies and slander, Günther! Go back to filming your Animal Farm-videos. Ethnic minorities were more than welcome to serve in many militaries! While the colonial powers kept folks from their colonies in their own units - thus you had French Moroccoan units and British Indian units, only United States kept her citizens in different regiments by their skin-colour. US Navy kept most jobs closed to blacks even though the ships themselves were not segregated. How many good sailors were doomed to waste their talents peeling potatoes because of that? And the segregation lasted until the Korean War in 1950-1953 and its effects were noticeable until the late 1970's when black officers finally became commonplace.
Military segregation was also invented by American racists in the early 19th century, as it didn't exist during the 18th century.
FUBAR!!! said:
4. Just because you don't believe in traditional gender roles, doesn't mean they don't exist. I think the presence of a female in a hyper masculine military subculture would probably trigger some sort of protective reaction from the men.
Hmm, so true. Except it's not. You're an unimaginative idiot who is apparently clueless about life and culture and gender roles outside of Hickville, Alabama and who gets their information from Rush Limbaugh.
If you had bothered to read the thread, dear ****wit-Günther, you would have seen posts from actual members (current or former) of different militaries (mostly European) with actual experience from deployments and living in mixed-gender units. None of the problems you envision happen. You would have come across my post where I explained that the white-knight myth comes from a single American pamphlet written in 1950 by some American major, who claims to have interviewed three IDF officers for it - except he doesn't name them and IDF itself has never published such material. You would have learned that 800,000 Soviet woman served in the Red Army during WW2, roughly half of them in combat arms - snipers, pilots, tank drivers & gunners, using mortars and artillery and so on, and Red Army has never decried their presence and neither has Frunze Academy published any books showing that they were a liability instead of an asset.
So you have your head shoved pretty deep in your ass and instead of sheepishly admitting your mistake, you - in a proper hyper-masculine way - refuse to pull it out but shove it deeper. Good entertainment for the rest of us, that's for sure but maybe you shouldn't be allowed anywhere near either a gun or a female as you obviously are unable to restrain your hyper-masculinity, Günther.
