jctcgames
Recruit
I've seen games unplayable with even minimum, and games playable well BELOW minimum. I never even look at requirements anymore.
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
Opinion: Your toaster computer is your own fault, not Taleworlds.
- Thread starter Gand
- Start date
Users who are viewing this thread
Recruit
I've seen games unplayable with even minimum, and games playable well BELOW minimum. I never even look at requirements anymore.
jctcgames
Recruit
What speed is your cpu and ram?... maybe even an SSD?
I fully agree that there are issues that are the games fault right now regarding performance, that seem quite random, I'm jabbing at the people that buy $300 dell office computers and want to play this game.
jctcgames
Recruit
I've heard some have actual issues using anything other than an SSD. but i use an SSD... loads fine, and fast actually.
I have a lenovo legion with exactly the same specifications and the game is unplayable due to the drop in fps
From the various comments I see popping up it seems PC Master race top tier ultra computers dont like the game, and some low tier ones struggle, but otherwise performance is pretty good for a first release early access.
32gb DDR4
Ryzen 1800x 8 core 3.7Ghz base
EVGA GTX 1080
IDK I've only noticed one or 2 stutters on the 800 battle size sieges, and the load screens sometimes stutter a tiny bit and the sound goes weird but mostly fine and doesnt affect gameplay, do plan on upgrading later this year though.
32gb DDR4
Ryzen 1800x 8 core 3.7Ghz base
EVGA GTX 1080
IDK I've only noticed one or 2 stutters on the 800 battle size sieges, and the load screens sometimes stutter a tiny bit and the sound goes weird but mostly fine and doesnt affect gameplay, do plan on upgrading later this year though.
Dude that's a fairly cheap build. Even in 2015 it wouldn't have been that much. I'm pretty sure he didn't need his dad to buy it for him unless he was 14 lol
Rude, factually incorrect, so much twaddle in the OP...and taking up space in this board at its busiest time!
I'm running off my SSD and it seems to be mediocre load times. I wouldn't say it's fast, but it's really slow either.
Who on earth is Lady Adelisa, I must apologise for the forum putting my post in your name!
berserkercookie
Recruit
Thats interesting. You are telling everyone the problem for the early access stutters and crashes is because their hardware is not up to date.
Well lets see.
Specs
i7 - 7700 quadcore 4.2 ghz
32 gb DDR3
GTX 1060 6gb
I can play custom battle with 1k soldiers. No problem.
But i can't play a single siege without the game going into stutter then freezing the entire game. Must be my Hardware obviously.
Its cause you don't have a 1080 bruh, game is designed to just crash if you don't Mount & Blade Flexlord, if you ain't flexin you crashin.
Minimum specs should get you low quality graphic settings, 150 soldiers on the battlefield and a solid 30 fps. You really shouldn't expect more.
Morbo513
Recruit
1: The game's recommended system specs list 8gb on the Steam store - Minimum is listed as 6. Granted, it should be common sense that that's not adequate for a large-scope game releasing in 2020, but it's still misleading. It absolutely is Taleworlds' responsibility to address this, either by optimising the game so that systems with these amounts of RAM can run the game with reasonable stability (at performance settings reduced within reason), or by changing the listed system requirements. Maybe at a stretch, refunds should be offered if the latter course is taken by the time the game is out of EA.
2: There are many accounts of the game suffering from a memory leak in the SP campaign, including my own experience, ensuring that past an hours' play-time performance will be severely degraded, particularly for those on 8gb RAM or less. Those minimum/recommended specs seem about right for custom battles/multiplayer at default settings by most accounts. Once again, there's not much the end user can do about this except wait for a patch that hopefully addresses it.
1070ti
16gb of ram
i7 8th gen
low settings I can't run 6v6 skirmish at even 30fps, but I run singleplayer at 90fps stable no problems, which leads me to conclude there is a bug in the multiplayer, which means to leaving a complaint in on the right forum on the right thread
16gb of ram
i7 8th gen
low settings I can't run 6v6 skirmish at even 30fps, but I run singleplayer at 90fps stable no problems, which leads me to conclude there is a bug in the multiplayer, which means to leaving a complaint in on the right forum on the right thread
masarius
They are ok/good. 1-2sec.
__
Everything maxed out except for AA, that only 2*.
Playing on WQHD.
Ryzen 3700x / 5700 xt Nitro
65-80fps in multiplayer. Only small maps so far.
Steady 90 fps in SP. Maybe a bit lower with big battles.
