-- Official Unofficial 'Ask Questions About Warband Singleplayer Here' Thread --
- 主题发起人 RobustTurd
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
SAUS
Veteran
What's with the overmap pathing? My party always tries to run to the nearest road and often just goes to derpy waypoints without the ability to prevent it. Like I will be north and a bit east of Suno and click on Suno and my dude just runs straight south to get to the road and then goes straight to Suno from there. Trying to click in short chunks to get a more direct route is often futile and can even make it worse lol.
It's one thing with roads, since at least maybe it will look nicer if your party travels on the roads, but the worst is the trees. The same behaviour happens when there are some nearby trees. My party runs just barely into the trees and scoots along the edge, slowing my party down on top of the already less direct path to my destination.
Anyone know why it's so finicky and derpy? Is there a way to prevent it outside of mods? lol
It's one thing with roads, since at least maybe it will look nicer if your party travels on the roads, but the worst is the trees. The same behaviour happens when there are some nearby trees. My party runs just barely into the trees and scoots along the edge, slowing my party down on top of the already less direct path to my destination.
Anyone know why it's so finicky and derpy? Is there a way to prevent it outside of mods? lol
Roads are a silly and somewhat lazy hack. They're just deformed terrain with desert in the middle to look like road. This really messes up pathfinding near them and thus they should be avoided at all costs.
I heard something about bannerlord having improve roads, which would be nice.
apostrophe
Recruit
does this game have a storyline like Viking Conquest? Is there anything after the merchant of Vulga's plot against the corrupt captain?
Nope, it's pure sandbox after that.
apostrophe
Recruit
jacobhinds 说:
Bummer =/ Viking Conquest entirely spoiled me.
Thank you.
I know you can hit your allies with arrows, but can your allies hit each other with arrows? I'll watch as my infantry go up the ladder to take a castle, and my allied missile troops fire right at the defenders at the chokepoint. It looks like the ally's arrows should be hitting the attacking troops on the ladder, but they never seem to.
Is it only the player's arrows that cause friendly fire damage? Or are the ranged troops just really good shots?
Is it only the player's arrows that cause friendly fire damage? Or are the ranged troops just really good shots?
Wow thank you! Now I can stop making my missile dudes hold their fire! You're a lifesaver.
Edit: Sorry, nother question:
I have my own faction, and once in a while lords show up at my castle and want to pledge allegiance. So far I've been accepting them only if they have a really good relationship with me, because I don't want any trouble. But is there any possible trouble that can come from them not liking me much? I know they can defect, but if I just don't give any fiefs to the ones who might defect, is there any other bad thing that can happen if I just accept every lord who shows up?
Edit: Sorry, nother question:
I have my own faction, and once in a while lords show up at my castle and want to pledge allegiance. So far I've been accepting them only if they have a really good relationship with me, because I don't want any trouble. But is there any possible trouble that can come from them not liking me much? I know they can defect, but if I just don't give any fiefs to the ones who might defect, is there any other bad thing that can happen if I just accept every lord who shows up?
Not really. If they defect then they'll join an enemy faction faster than if you hadn't accepted them in the first place, but if you never give them any fiefs and they're all rubbish lords anyway, you'll be sabotaging the enemy by flooding them with arrogant idiots.
Higher amount of Leadership grants higher party size(+10 per skill),and Renown also gives a certain amount,depending on the amount you have currently.So if you want to have a larger party,give more to Leadership,and also battle with larger parties(you have to win!),or even participate in tournaments.Both of these increase renown.And btw,by gradually battling parties in early game,you will get a certain amount of renown,but this amount will decrease,once you have attained a particular number(for eg: Having 500 renown,and then battling parties that have about the same number of men as yours,won't give you much renown,and in some cases,not even 1 renown).
Thats why you should eventually aim for the larger party-owning lords.
Thats why you should eventually aim for the larger party-owning lords.
I know bastard swords have a disadvantage while wielded one handed, something like a third of some of the stats are taken away. My question, is there is a similar stat reduction while using 2H weapons on horse back? I ask because it would make sense as the sword is being used as a 1H.
If you use a 2 handed/1 handed weapon in one handed mode, there's only a 15% decrease in speed and damage. If you use a two handed weapon on horseback, there is a 30% reduction. If you plan on using a bastard sword or something similar on horseback, I recommend using it one handed with a shield.TheWarArmoury 说:
