w00d
Recruit

As King i spend all my time doing 3 things
1. shopping for ale, oil and wine
2. feasting ( tho i had to apply the hall less lords behavior fix)
3. not assigning fiefs.
i figured out that the best way to retain my current lords is not to accept anymore and not to give anyone anymore fiefs after their initial fief.
Why? because every time u assign a fief to someone, everyone else or least most of them get pissed off, which is why all that ale, oil and wine goes into bribing. So the best way to keep the peace is to NOT assign anyone anything, ( not even to yourself which makes sense as the tax inefficiency makes their income negligible ) other than their initial fief and preferable to keep them close to your main city. ( so its easy for them to attend the feasts etc )
tbh i have not seen any reason to actually put more than the a few troops in the castles or assign one to a lord. When the computer ai sieges them they usually turn up with most of their army and so even if u had 400 top tier troops there, the AI will win. (Tested a few times, 150 Hurscarls backed by 150 Rhodok Sharpshooters and 100 swadian knights , 1000 man ai won with less than 200 losses. ). Changing the composition did not really matter for some reason.
my strat is actually to encourage them to come siege a city. then u rush to their castles, take 1-2 of them and rush back to defend the city. ( u can defend a 1600 siege with 200 men easily ) , repeat until they lost everything.
the few benefits of assigning to a lord are not really that immediate. They might patrol around and defeat some bandits but its too much for them normally ( and they do not clear a village of bandits out on their own ) and since u don't assign the fief to anyone, the income is not missed anyway.
Anyone else come to the same conclusion or am i missing something here?
edit: typos
1. shopping for ale, oil and wine
2. feasting ( tho i had to apply the hall less lords behavior fix)
3. not assigning fiefs.
i figured out that the best way to retain my current lords is not to accept anymore and not to give anyone anymore fiefs after their initial fief.
Why? because every time u assign a fief to someone, everyone else or least most of them get pissed off, which is why all that ale, oil and wine goes into bribing. So the best way to keep the peace is to NOT assign anyone anything, ( not even to yourself which makes sense as the tax inefficiency makes their income negligible ) other than their initial fief and preferable to keep them close to your main city. ( so its easy for them to attend the feasts etc )
tbh i have not seen any reason to actually put more than the a few troops in the castles or assign one to a lord. When the computer ai sieges them they usually turn up with most of their army and so even if u had 400 top tier troops there, the AI will win. (Tested a few times, 150 Hurscarls backed by 150 Rhodok Sharpshooters and 100 swadian knights , 1000 man ai won with less than 200 losses. ). Changing the composition did not really matter for some reason.
my strat is actually to encourage them to come siege a city. then u rush to their castles, take 1-2 of them and rush back to defend the city. ( u can defend a 1600 siege with 200 men easily ) , repeat until they lost everything.
the few benefits of assigning to a lord are not really that immediate. They might patrol around and defeat some bandits but its too much for them normally ( and they do not clear a village of bandits out on their own ) and since u don't assign the fief to anyone, the income is not missed anyway.
Anyone else come to the same conclusion or am i missing something here?
edit: typos