<> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>

正在查看此主题的用户

Doomicus 说:
Did you really find that fun, Marshall?

Definitely not allowing you guys to pick Khergs again.

You only told us 1 hr before the actual game, so I just went along with it.


Was a joke tbh. Well done though.

Pretty sure you have done the same to us not that we did it on purpose.. don't you remember?

GG!
 
bobstar_24 说:
Papa Lazarou 说:
While we're at it we should stop playing for draws as well.
There is nothing you can do to stop people from doing that...

Except extend the round timer, which I think is an excellent idea!

Basically make it much harder to stop MOTF from coming up (I dislike MOTF too, but it's better than one guy riding off for the draw).
 
ACC1 说:
Doomicus 说:
Did you really find that fun, Marshall?

Definitely not allowing you guys to pick Khergs again.

You only told us 1 hr before the actual game, so I just went along with it.


Was a joke tbh. Well done though.

Pretty sure you have done the same to us not that we did it on purpose.. don't you remember?

GG!

Needs to be a deadline for the defender choosing the faction because, being the attackers, we could not get any strats together as we had no idea which faction would be unavailable to us.
 
ProPaul 说:
Needs to be a deadline for the defender choosing the faction because, being the attackers, we could not get any strats together as we had no idea which faction would be unavailable to us.

That's happened to us in a few games. Good idea =)
 
I agree, like i said, you guys have done it to us as well. Attacker should have to provide team 3-5 days before the date.
 
Doomicus 说:
Definitely not allowing you guys to pick Khergs again.

You only told us 1 hr before the actual game, so I just went along with it.
You have come to matches without telling us your faction at all, so we have done it to each other. As I said in game, if you didn't wish us to pick Khergits for our match, then you should have explicitly stated so. This is what agreements before battles are for. Next game, if you wish to cut out a faction choice, let us know. Plain and simple.

I believe that there are many things in this game that all of us have done at one point or another that is considered "OP" or "gamey". Unfortunately we can't always just put a blanket ban on stuff that people don't like, unless we all actually want to remove all the differences between factions, and have completely identical troops and equipment (ala Laszlo's mod).

I say that for the next campaign, or maybe even sooner, we can have a single vote from each oceanic clan on matters such as this to decide once and for all what is allowed and what isn't.

Good game to everyone involved, even if you did not see it as so.
 
That is all fair enough, but fact is, Khergits are contradictory to the point of this campaign. Do you guys want to vs Khergits every time you fight on open plains? Unless you are incredibly lucky with the landscape, you are helpless.
 
ProPaul 说:
That is all fair enough, but fact is, Khergits are contradictory to the point of this campaign. Do you guys want to vs Khergits every time you fight on open plains? Unless you are incredibly lucky with the landscape, you are helpless.

Like Scorch said, if you don't want Khergits in a battle, say so beforehand.

Just like with the Nords - took a few battles before anything happened about it, because the point of this campaign and the reason the rules are so lax is because nobody really knows what's going to work ahead of time. Gotta alter things as you go.
 
Khergits, most hated faction, ugliest armor (with the tribal armor, try blocking with a polearm, one of your shoulders disappear) and gayest units (horse archer). No wonder why in pub servers it voted off instantly 95% of times.
 
I refer you to the combined clan match that we had a little while ago. Everyone pretty much agrees that that was epic fun, and that was a 15v15.
 
RAOUL 说:
I don't really understand how a 20 vs 20 could possibly be enjoyable.

Respect.

Wow I always thought KEEN had small numbers because they were picky. But you guys actually prefer small battles?

I'm eagerly awating 32v32 battles to fill out the 64 player server. Then a year from now Australia makes a big 222 player server like the EU's did.... Oh man it will be epic...
 
Scorch! 说:
I refer you to the combined clan match that we had a little while ago. Everyone pretty much agrees that that was epic fun, and that was a 15v15.

Epic fun?

It was a mess man, it takes away so much from the game because half of the kills and deaths are just random straggling in the back hits.
 
Just my thoughts on the Khergit debacle:


1. I don't see KoS's decision to choose Khergits and dominate on open plains any different from Dojo's, KEEN's, and KoS's decisions to use Nords to dominate on Port Assault. The scores of those matches agree with me.

2. If Dojo requested KoS not use Khergits I'm certain we would have come to an agreement very quickly. But Dojo had 70 KP's so KoS weren't going to go easy on them. Dojo should have predicted KoS would choose Khergits, and they didn't, so I simply have to consider that a strategic failure.

3. I'm open to banning factions. But if I do it's going to be a ban on Nords and Khergits. Not one or the other.
 
Laszlo 说:
Just my thoughts on the Khergit debacle:


1. I don't see KoS's decision to choose Khergits and dominate on open plains any different from Dojo's, KEEN's, and KoS's decisions to use Nords to dominate on Port Assault. The scores of those matches agree with me.

2. If Dojo requested KoS not use Khergits I'm certain we would have come to an agreement very quickly. But Dojo had 70 KP's so KoS weren't going to go easy on them. Dojo should have predicted KoS would choose Khergits, and they didn't, so I simply have to consider that a strategic failure.

3. I'm open to banning factions. But if I do it's going to be a ban on Nords and Khergits. Not one or the other.


The Difference is laszlo after that nord port assault mach dojo and keen where AGREEING that it was stacked to the bull****.
You guys are sitting back acting as if it was great skill on your part in choosing them?
Good game? It was hopeless. that was the very definition of a bad game.

the next match Keen had we took out Nords, you guys seam like you would keep using them if you could.
 
sathe 说:
Laszlo 说:
Just my thoughts on the Khergit debacle:


1. I don't see KoS's decision to choose Khergits and dominate on open plains any different from Dojo's, KEEN's, and KoS's decisions to use Nords to dominate on Port Assault. The scores of those matches agree with me.

2. If Dojo requested KoS not use Khergits I'm certain we would have come to an agreement very quickly. But Dojo had 70 KP's so KoS weren't going to go easy on them. Dojo should have predicted KoS would choose Khergits, and they didn't, so I simply have to consider that a strategic failure.

3. I'm open to banning factions. But if I do it's going to be a ban on Nords and Khergits. Not one or the other.


The Difference is laszlo after that nord port assault mach dojo and keen where AGREEING that it was stacked to the bull****.
You guys are sitting back acting as if it was great skill on your part in choosing them?
Good game? It was hopeless. that was the very definition of a bad game.

the next match Keen had we took out Nords, you guys seam like you would keep using them if you could.

Have you read any of the posts in the past two pages?

Saying "GG" does not mean we're not open to negotiation, and Scorch specifically said that we're open to non-khergit games.
 
I like wunterson he is funny.. Specially when he gets rage angry.. lol :razz:

Hopefully we get that 20v20 next sun set up, will be wicked fun!
 
后退
顶部 底部