<> OCEANIC CAMPAIGN I: OFFICIAL THREAD <>
- 主题发起人 The Adjudicator
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
UberWiggett
Regular
I've made a current list thread onour public forum section. easy to find if the link doesn't work.
http://ironhorsemen.47.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15
http://ironhorsemen.47.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15
Ok, sorry Las. Also
For good measure.
Doomicus 说:
Fark orf!
For good measure.
Yahwade
Veteran
Laszlo 说:
If (and they have) they refuse to take the field, what happens? The Dojo warriors have set sail already:
Doomicus 说:
Now when the warriors arrive and SPLHCW refuse to take the field against them, should they not forfiet that hex if not the points also?
I didnt see anything in the rules about that.
I too wonder about this Yahwade.
Also, the fact that we planned it well in advance for the 25th of March and it's not the 30th, to only just NOW be told it's not on is ridiculous. We could have atleast done something else in that time.
Sushi, get your act together you retard. Also, sif make Laszlo search through all the pages because you speak lies.
Also, the fact that we planned it well in advance for the 25th of March and it's not the 30th, to only just NOW be told it's not on is ridiculous. We could have atleast done something else in that time.
Sushi, get your act together you retard. Also, sif make Laszlo search through all the pages because you speak lies.
Doom, screw you.
Lol sorry guys Dojo doesn't get the hex.
The entire existence of the option to refuse an attack gives that away.
Otherwise it would be 'you must take to the field and resolve ingame or forfeit the hex'
But look, if a clan turtles, then the Adjudicator can grant their foes a 'special attack' which cannot be refused. ATM they've only refused 1 battle so a little early to think about that.
The entire existence of the option to refuse an attack gives that away.
Otherwise it would be 'you must take to the field and resolve ingame or forfeit the hex'
But look, if a clan turtles, then the Adjudicator can grant their foes a 'special attack' which cannot be refused. ATM they've only refused 1 battle so a little early to think about that.
You should add in on the first page something that records how many times a clan fails to defend their lands.
I would think if a clan reaches three or so times, they should not be allowed to again. Also, if it's against the same Kingdom, they shouldn't be able to do it more than twice.
SPLH have only accepted a battle where they have double the numbers, hah. They will probably get creamed too.
Get some nuts.
I would think if a clan reaches three or so times, they should not be allowed to again. Also, if it's against the same Kingdom, they shouldn't be able to do it more than twice.
SPLH have only accepted a battle where they have double the numbers, hah. They will probably get creamed too.
Get some nuts.
Your attack was refused because we were already scrambling to arrange a time with KEEN (who requested that they be outnumbered by the way), various people had trouble updating the game, etc. You'll get your turn. Just be reasonable.
Papa Lazarou, don't burst his bubble. He only wants to be all tough and manly by heaping scorn on others. 
Yahwade
Veteran
I highly disagree with the "right to refuse" concept. What do our 6 hardy warriors do when they get to hex F3? SPLHCW refuse to fight so they sail home again?
If a hex of yours is legitimately attacked and you refuse to defend it, you cede ownership of that territory to the atacking kingdom.
In effect what has happened is SPLHCW have fled in terror once they realised the mighty warriors of the Order of the Dojo were in the ships that appeared over the horizon.
I can understand perhaps making a rule that says a kingdom can only be attacked once per week, so if they are already under attack, then the new attack must take place the following week (or whenever it gets organised). Im guessing that the story would go:
"Bad weather in the Sea of Caldaria has caused the Dojo fleet to be delayed a week, they are now expected to land xx/xx/xx date"
I would say there should also be a penalty for the kingdom that refuses to defnd its lands. Minus some points perhaps?
If a hex of yours is legitimately attacked and you refuse to defend it, you cede ownership of that territory to the atacking kingdom.
In effect what has happened is SPLHCW have fled in terror once they realised the mighty warriors of the Order of the Dojo were in the ships that appeared over the horizon.
I can understand perhaps making a rule that says a kingdom can only be attacked once per week, so if they are already under attack, then the new attack must take place the following week (or whenever it gets organised). Im guessing that the story would go:
"Bad weather in the Sea of Caldaria has caused the Dojo fleet to be delayed a week, they are now expected to land xx/xx/xx date"
I would say there should also be a penalty for the kingdom that refuses to defnd its lands. Minus some points perhaps?
UberWiggett
Regular
it is a bit iffy, perhaps if we limit the attacks to weekends and only have 1 battle per kingdom contested (so clans can team up and fight two battles on a weekend). I can understand the trouble of finding players for spl, and seeing as keen is already trying to attack them then it's not too fair to take their hex.
in other news, after their victorious defense, KoS retired to their merry HOLE IN THE GROUND for much fun, but upon their return they find THIS
*****es.
Edit: ok keen can you repost your attack on IH properly this time? so we can set a date, sunday after next is most likely.
in other news, after their victorious defense, KoS retired to their merry HOLE IN THE GROUND for much fun, but upon their return they find THIS
*****es.
Edit: ok keen can you repost your attack on IH properly this time? so we can set a date, sunday after next is most likely.
Night Ninja 说:Papa Lazarou, don't burst his bubble. He only wants to be all tough and manly by heaping scorn on others.
Yet another pointless and stupid post. Congrats.
I am aware of that Papa, but I did say we can organise something after the war and sushi was OK with that, but now apparently he hasn't even considered it for a while but failed to post anything.
I don't think it's not being reasonable to want to know what's going on.
It's fair enough that a clan refuses an attack if they already have another one they're trying to deal with.
If people insist on making a specific rule about this, it should be "clans have the right to refuse an attack if they already have another battle planned/underway".
If people insist on making a specific rule about this, it should be "clans have the right to refuse an attack if they already have another battle planned/underway".
MdK
Regular
HTAPAWASO 说:
I agree.
Clans should be able to refuse an attack IF they have another attack pending by another faction. There should be a limit on how far in advance matches can be organized though, to save factions organizing matches for ridiculous amounts of time ahead to avoid having to accept other matches.
All this wrangling wouldn't be present if we had a turn structure in the same fashion as a board game. While it'd make the campaign less fluid, you'd be able to resolve the actions that each faction has available to them in a more equitable fashion. It'd also reduce the Adjudicator's workload a great deal.
I propose a system where the number of strongholds controlled determines the quantity of actions that a faction has available to them per round/turn e.g. 0 strongholds = 0 attack actions, 1 stronghold = 1 attack action, etc. A faction that has no stronghold would need to piggyback on another which is kind enough to pass a stronghold on to them and the increased number of actions would be greater incentive to attack an opposing faction at the heart of their strength.
I'd rather my posts get insulted by you than complimented by anyone else. It means I'm doing something right.
I propose a system where the number of strongholds controlled determines the quantity of actions that a faction has available to them per round/turn e.g. 0 strongholds = 0 attack actions, 1 stronghold = 1 attack action, etc. A faction that has no stronghold would need to piggyback on another which is kind enough to pass a stronghold on to them and the increased number of actions would be greater incentive to attack an opposing faction at the heart of their strength.
Doomicus 说:
I'd rather my posts get insulted by you than complimented by anyone else. It means I'm doing something right.
Jeez, I don't remember the Dojo guys being such jerks when I was playing, you used to be the laid back clan. Granted I guess that was four months ago.
All our players have real life things going on right now, Keen asked first and so we're more concerned with organising the battle with them first because they've been waiting a long time. When that's done and we can reasonably organise a match without having to keep you waiting a fortnight or two you can challenge SPLH again. That is unless you want to fight a SPLH team that's 90% KoS.
All our players have real life things going on right now, Keen asked first and so we're more concerned with organising the battle with them first because they've been waiting a long time. When that's done and we can reasonably organise a match without having to keep you waiting a fortnight or two you can challenge SPLH again. That is unless you want to fight a SPLH team that's 90% KoS.
