How did this thread become about the womz too?
NO WOMEN IN VIDYA GAMES!
NO WOMEN IN VIDYA GAMES!
-
If you are reporting a bug, please head over to our Technical Support section for Bannerlord.
New factions?
- 主题发起人 Cèsar de Quart
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
One I'd like to see is perhaps a small merchant republic, based on Venice, Genoa, Pisa... They together with the Vlandian rebels would eventually make up the Rhodoks
-Talks about 11th century
Women in ancient warfare - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Here. Knock yourself out.
-Gives an example from ancient times.
White Ahroun
Banned
You're in luck, smartass! Another topic led me to this handy sight right at the top of a search for "11th century warrior women." Click and learn.
I thought you were talking about enlisted women warriors in armies, not nobles leading their own armies... but whatever.
White Ahroun
Banned
Why not?
Would be pretty cool
Ah yes "fantatical modern egalitarianism"
Have we made women... TOO equal? Have we not oppressed them TOO MUCH?
OH HOW THE PENDULUM SWINGS WILDLY
If only
Mount and blade going full fantasy would be amazing for meThis isn't a historical game though is very light "fantasy"... I generally agree that the game is too grounded for female warriors to seem feasible... But I think viewing the game as a historical game tends to limit the "cool factor" of what the game could be.. that's just me of course
Of course the game is light fantasy, I have no issue with that at all. Cheers.
People tend to take real life elements into contexted/set up fantasy realms without proper inspection or screening. Some even don't even care to rename the elements and don't neccessarily experience any discomfort by that betrayal.
I would say no new factions are needed in the world of Calradia, as the devs see the lore. It would mean expanded game field or map, and that would mean at least a new version or a large expansion pack I don't just see that coming together in the near future with the economical V-crash hitting the markets and purchasing power now.
I would say no new factions are needed in the world of Calradia, as the devs see the lore. It would mean expanded game field or map, and that would mean at least a new version or a large expansion pack I don't just see that coming together in the near future with the economical V-crash hitting the markets and purchasing power now.
Not being snarky, but you think a 9th and 15th inspired faction would be internally inconsistent? The armour especially would be vastly superior for the 15th century one. Although I grant you that for gameplay you can gloss over that fact. But my brain would itch.
+1
I don't believe there needs to be new cultures, unless they split out the current ones into subgroups. The game should stay around the European-Middle East zone. If they enlarge the map and add more kingdoms that would be grand.
Nono that's a fair question
what I said was that I'd want each faction to be internally consistent, meaning that I wouldn't want a japanese inspired faction to use roman elements ect.
How effective the real life versions of the armor the game uses as inspiration are or arent doesn't really matter thaat much to me.. aslong as you can see a clear progression within the faction fx. You can of course use a factions obvious advantages to inform their gameplay advantages.. So if you had a 15th faction it'd make sense for them to have the heaviest armor, but it wouldnt at all have to follow the real life version's "stats".
I don't view this game as a historical or realistic simulation or anything near it, I view it as a fantasy game... So if I have maya inspired faction and a late medieval faction, I'm perfectly fine with the idea that they can be competitive.
Why does this keep happening? People site references that prove nothing except there were a few rare exceptions in history (which is exactly what the majority of players want, i.e. rare exceptions of female warlords, not a idiotic 50/50 split). Anecdotally, I know a sum total of zero women that game. Far better evidence is number of hours gamed and on which games. I can guarantee you the choice of games between men and women are not the same, just like their choice in career is not the same.
Women are not, not playing Bannerlord because there aren't 50/50 female split. Nothing keeps women from playing it other than their own interests. Because right now there is a 50/50 split and the females players are still few and far to be seen. Taleworlds did not do it for money reasons, they did it simply because it was the easiest to potentially avoid bad press. A culture of fear has been created and it has nothing to do with equality.
Women were not oppressed. People were oppressed. 80% of the population until the last 150 years were peasants. They all lived on the breadline. Men did horrible jobs, same as the women, and often more dangerous and in conditions terrible for their health. The only "oppressors" would have been the ruling class. Maybe women had some restrictions on social behaviour but so did men for many centuries. A man could also not just marry in the medieval period. Men did not have universal sufferage until also 150 years ago or so. For 99% of history men and women suffered together. There was no birth control. That dictated all. There was no grand patriarchal conspiracy to keep women down. Society was ordered in ways for the group to survive the best it could. Individual freedoms were oppressed all around, differently between the genders certainly, but not exclusively against women.
The very concept of patriarchy is a psuedo-concept that was dreamed up in Women's Studies in the last 50 years. Why? Because they had to conjure up a reason for their field of work. Around the 50s there was the political question; why are there so few female professors? So what they did was invite many women who were mostly English majors into universities in the newly minted Women's Studies faculties. Since then that field has never been held to anything resembling scientific rigour because it is pseudo-science.
And today it is very much fanatical. It is a new religion. If you criticise it you run the risk of being jailed (in the UK), losing your career, or more mundanely, banned from a gaming forum. Douglas Murray wrote a good book on how the removal of religion left a social hole for this sort of moral Marxism to take hold. Many people have the God-gene, i.e. a need to believe in something bigger than themselves. Sprinkle on some pseudo-morality (just like religions did in the past) and wham people start parroting the new dogma, desperate to be seen as virtuous and eager to denounce those who step out of line.
最后编辑:
