It's not that I think it's a bad idea, but I don't think it fits with M&B. I just think that this kind of system should be asymmetric, in short. Do you know Natural Selection ?ok i will try to be more concise thank you,
but could you explain more why you think my idea is bad?
napolean wasnt stale even if most people used bayonet not sure if you can compare them, maybe your right, but i would like to try it on a custom server,Yes the game won't be completely stale if every faction just has 1 loadout as that is the best one to use so why use anything else.
You are very special, please go to the nearest bridge and seek help at the bottom. Thank you very much for your cooperation, we are sad that we won't be hearing more from you.
if your arguement is that most people will only play one class/playstyle then i get it,It's not that I think it's a bad idea, but I don't think it fits with M&B. I just think that this kind of system should be asymmetric, in short. Do you know Natural Selection ?
First of all NW is stale af, there is only groupfighting lmao.if your arguement is that most people will only play one class/playstyle then i get it,
it will probably be boring but maybe with the correct balance
like buffing armor against arrows (in the case of people spamming archer tactics)
people wouldnt just play one playstyle, and even if they did, if it was fun wouldnt that be ok?
just an idea, i would like someone to put this into a custom server to try, but it might be bad though or be good
Well said... I haven't even answered him anymore because he has double posted again and I really don't like to waste my time on what he says.OP's suggestion is extremely unwise, and here's why:
By equalizing all stats and equipment availability throughout the board, it kills any and all variety to the gameplay. Factions would become obsolete. Playing different roles would become obsolete -since there would be one (and only one) prevailing loadout meta which *I guarantee you* everyone would be playing within a week of this concept being implemented.
Having different roles (inf, cav, archer) adds variety and enjoyment to the gameplay. Likewise, someone playing inf shouldn't be able to pick up a bow and use it like an archer. Nor should inf and archers be able to mount warhorses -these things disrupt the game balance.
Warband did the class system incredibly well. Inf, cav, and archers were clearly distinct in how they operated and what role they played in a match. Plus, thresholds in attributes and skills like strength, riding, power throw, and power draw meant that players couldn't just pick up any weapon or mount any stray horse and use it to their liking. They had to stick to their roles and operate within those parameters. It made for a more well-balanced and enjoyable experience than the one Bannerlord offers.
Plus, the equipment specific to each faction gave that faction a unique flavor and a (slightly) different playstyle than the other factions. For example, Nord cav played way different than Swadian cav, largely in part to the different equipment available to each (Free javs for Nords, Awlpike drop for Swadians).
By advocating a universal equipment selection for Bannerlord, you're really killing whatever small modicum of fun is left in this game.
I am all in for Warband system, which was not stats equalized. Archers needs to be weak melee and only cav needs to be abble to mount horses. Only archers needs to be abble to shoot properly. These factors are making the game more infantry oriented for better balance.why is equalizing a bad idea? can you please explain?
i would rather have the warband 3 class system rather the new bannerlord system though
thanks man, i appreciate it,I think that all your ideas together on one custom server would be much more fun than what we have now but it sounds like reballancing the entire game. If your proposed system was implemented without your other balance changes to speed and what-not I don't think it would be much fun. I wish you were able to create a server to try it out.
What tw gives us will never be fun for me at least.
Don't really get why people are being so nasty to you for just spit balling ideas, good on you for killing them with kindness. Even some I respect are being uncharacteristic. I guess it's been a long hard road for too many and they just need to vent.
really? can you describe why?