Native Groupfighting- Server up
- 主题发起人 14e_Tiberias
- 开始时间
正在查看此主题的用户
Groupfighting wont gain you battle experience either, as it's just inf v inf, no cav and archers who are a major factor of battle.Eladon 说:Prince Apollo 说:The 'Extra' Server is called 'The Ludus'
Ludus is great for training individual mechanics but you don't gain any of the battle awareness or swapping needed for long term infantry improvement. I'm a massive fan of dueling but Groupfighting / Ludus / IG all train different skills so having all three would be great.
Not everything is about getting experience, this server is fun to play on, isn't that enough?Ciiges 说:Groupfighting wont gain you battle experience either, as it's just inf v inf, no cav and archers who are a major factor of battle.Eladon 说:Prince Apollo 说:The 'Extra' Server is called 'The Ludus'
Ludus is great for training individual mechanics but you don't gain any of the battle awareness or swapping needed for long term infantry improvement. I'm a massive fan of dueling but Groupfighting / Ludus / IG all train different skills so having all three would be great.
Ye, I put it offline now in order to configure it properly. And also It will be 25 slots instead of 50 with small maps !
If you auto-assign teams and prevent team switching I'm all for it. In the past what you would get is the best players stacking 1 team (only needs to be 3-4 players to make a difference).
AnchorTheMean 说:
Ofc but I have no idea to how to do that
Kragen 说:
100%
Caius-BE
It's funny to see that 34 people are against the fact that the server could be back.
I mean, Native Group Fighting is the reason why IG decided to upgrade their server and put instant flag spawn to avoid the " running in circles " thing, and it worked, it's only because more and more people where enjoying the Native Group Fighting that they decided to do that, by doing so, many people came back to play on IG because it's way funnier than before.
There was competitivity between the two servers at that time and, for example, it's like when you put in competition two enterprises, it's beneficial for the consumer, they have more choices and it pushes the enterprises to do better than the other so they can have more consumers,...
In fact I don't see why people would be against this " enterprise ".
Nobody is forcing you to " buy the products ", it's also a free service, and, by the way, I don't know about you, but Tiberias sent me a message that said that the players limit would be 20 maximum.
This server will never kill IG, because as I said, IG decided to make a move and listen to the players that were saying that they were tired of the " running in circles " thing because Native Group Fighting appeared in the past and began to have a lot of success.
Now, those two servers will be additional, there is absolutely no unfair competition, it's beneficial for all the players, and I don't understand why people are against that return, it would also mean that you're against the fact that many people were having a lot of fun on this server.
That's just my opinion.
I mean, Native Group Fighting is the reason why IG decided to upgrade their server and put instant flag spawn to avoid the " running in circles " thing, and it worked, it's only because more and more people where enjoying the Native Group Fighting that they decided to do that, by doing so, many people came back to play on IG because it's way funnier than before.
There was competitivity between the two servers at that time and, for example, it's like when you put in competition two enterprises, it's beneficial for the consumer, they have more choices and it pushes the enterprises to do better than the other so they can have more consumers,...
In fact I don't see why people would be against this " enterprise ".
Nobody is forcing you to " buy the products ", it's also a free service, and, by the way, I don't know about you, but Tiberias sent me a message that said that the players limit would be 20 maximum.
This server will never kill IG, because as I said, IG decided to make a move and listen to the players that were saying that they were tired of the " running in circles " thing because Native Group Fighting appeared in the past and began to have a lot of success.
Now, those two servers will be additional, there is absolutely no unfair competition, it's beneficial for all the players, and I don't understand why people are against that return, it would also mean that you're against the fact that many people were having a lot of fun on this server.
That's just my opinion.
Caius-BE
Alene 说:
Well, it's not funny, I think that he doesn't really care about the people who say no, he cares about the people who say yes.
He just wants to know if there are still people who are interested by the concept and if people would come to play on the server, otherwise, what's the point of bringing it back ? and the best way to know how many people are going to come on the server is to make a poll.
In my post I'm just saying that I don't understand why people would be against somebody that is trying to create something new and that could bring a lot of fun to many people without penalizing anybody.
___
I love chocolate, but there's a guy who is going to come to offer milk.
I don't want people to drink milk, everybody has to eat chocolate.
That's a bad example.
Two servers, two places for people to go. That splits the "community" that currently mainly plays on IG, making it less populated and, well, less fun, at least for me. Sure, the concept is nice, and it's fun to play melee only once or twice, but it does get boring pretty quick and then you have two half-populated servers(or one fully, if this one goes down to 20 slots).
Also, "noone forces you to play on it" is technically true, yes, but if you want to play with others, and IG is empty, where do you go...hm?
Also, most players tend to play on IG to practice their skills and as someone else already said - playing on an infantry-only server doesn't make you a better infantry - You will have to watch out for archers and cavalry in real matches.
Two servers, two places for people to go. That splits the "community" that currently mainly plays on IG, making it less populated and, well, less fun, at least for me. Sure, the concept is nice, and it's fun to play melee only once or twice, but it does get boring pretty quick and then you have two half-populated servers(or one fully, if this one goes down to 20 slots).
Also, "noone forces you to play on it" is technically true, yes, but if you want to play with others, and IG is empty, where do you go...hm?
Also, most players tend to play on IG to practice their skills and as someone else already said - playing on an infantry-only server doesn't make you a better infantry - You will have to watch out for archers and cavalry in real matches.
I don't understand the problem, since Native Group fighting is just a server. Are you trying to say that every other server is bad because they're not going to IG, I don't understand. It's an acquired taste, if you like to group fight then group fight. Would this mean you wouldn't like the Hunger Games servers and 28 days invasion servers?. If people are moving from IG to Native Group fighting this means that they want to play group fighting... I don't understand the concept of 'Lol new server that people like, IG ded' WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT. THE SERVER HAS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PURPOSE I don't understand... please someone tell me.
Yes you're **** right ya'know it doesn't make you a better infantry, Blocking multiple people, getting in plenty of infantry fights. You're a genius. DOES THIS ALSO MEAN LUDUS IS BAD BECAUSE PEOPLE FROM IG GO LUDUS????????. You've also got to remember a large number of top players have a duelling background which contained no cav or archers.
So many Moron comments about it beating IG, this server isn't here to beat IG when they're two COMPLETELY different server types. Like what? People are seriously saying 'No' because people like me who'd just banter on IG and do nothing move to a server I actually like to play on?. The only reason IG gets full of people is because there's no where else to go, so they're forced to play IG. People will start whipping out 2H axes etc. It's not like Group-fighting is a second IG....
Namakan 说:
Yes you're **** right ya'know it doesn't make you a better infantry, Blocking multiple people, getting in plenty of infantry fights. You're a genius. DOES THIS ALSO MEAN LUDUS IS BAD BECAUSE PEOPLE FROM IG GO LUDUS????????. You've also got to remember a large number of top players have a duelling background which contained no cav or archers.
So many Moron comments about it beating IG, this server isn't here to beat IG when they're two COMPLETELY different server types. Like what? People are seriously saying 'No' because people like me who'd just banter on IG and do nothing move to a server I actually like to play on?. The only reason IG gets full of people is because there's no where else to go, so they're forced to play IG. People will start whipping out 2H axes etc. It's not like Group-fighting is a second IG....
类似的主题
